David Lemcoe wrote on Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:12:33 -0400:
> So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this
> method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry.
Yes, this message contains in-reply-to/references. The others did not.
Which means that there is no threading available
Hello everyone
I am using CentOS 5.2 and facing a browsing problem I had complete
system update of 71 applications recently and after the update
completed my system can receive emails but cannot send and cannot
browse get error domain not found, besides ftping is working fine web
servers are worki
Tariq Ismail Dalvi wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I am using CentOS 5.2 and facing a browsing problem I had complete
> system update of 71 applications recently and after the update
> completed my system can receive emails but cannot send and cannot
> browse get error domain not found, besides ftping
Craig White schrieb:
>
>
> Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is
> < 50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to
> justfiy.
>
In that case, shelling out the 7-something grand for RHE-IPA is probably
also not an option, I assume.
> I
David M Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
> Let me clarify. When I install the web server packages on a Cent install.
You have to do that yourself. You know, do what a sysadmin does? :-)
Glenn
> --Original Message--
> From: Brian Mathis
> Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
> To: CentOS Mailing list
> R
Craig White wrote:
> doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant
> thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS
>
> http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5
>
That mostly looks to be a waste of time to me, specially given that Red
Hat
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 01:43 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:52:04 -0400:
>
> > AFAIK, my 5.3 is completely "box stock" in this area, and probably 98%
> > of others too. I have no /etc/grub*.
> >
> >$ ls -l /etc/grub*
> >ls: /etc/grub*: No such
From: Scott Silva
> >> Someone did a great job on the new graphic, but it is just not for me...
> > Same here.
> > New graphic looks nice but, for me, the high contrast on the right side
> > makes
> the separation between (light) windows and a (dark) desktop less clear...
No body complained whe
David Lemcoe wrote:
> So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this
> method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry.
>
as Kai already pointed out - it has the in-reply-to headers, so thats
one issue fixed. Would still be nice if you could trim your posts.
- KB
_
Dnk wrote:
> Please reply off list as this is ot from CentOS.
... so you should use the [OT] tag in the subject line
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 08/04/2009, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 4-6-2009 6:50 AM John Doe spake the following:
> >> Someone did a great job on the new graphic, but it is just not for me...
> >
> > Same here.
> > New graphic looks nice but, for me, the high contrast on the right side
> > makes the separation between (ligh
From: Tariq Ismail Dalvi
> I am using CentOS 5.2 and facing a browsing problem I had complete
> system update of 71 applications recently and after the update
> completed my system can receive emails but cannot send and cannot
> browse get error domain not found, besides ftping is working fine we
Craig White wrote:
> doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant
> thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS
>
> http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5
>
> which I'm not totally adverse to doing but I have to ask, is there
> someth
After taking forever to update lists, it worked just fine :) thanks!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Angenendt
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:56:54
To:
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Issues with vsftpd install
___
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 4-6-2009 6:50 AM John Doe spake the following:
>
>>> Someone did a great job on the new graphic, but it is just not for me...
>>>
>> Same here.
>> New graphic looks nice but, for me, the high contrast on the right side
>> makes the separation between (light) windo
So now I know to use the GMail app for Blackberry. Nice to know.
On 4/8/09, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> David Lemcoe wrote:
>> So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this
>> method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry.
>>
>
> as Kai already pointed out - it has the in-rep
From: Marcus Moeller
> I want to update my CF-Microdrive for my router with CentOS (currently
> there is Slacky on it). I have attached the microdrive to my notebook
> using a pcmcia CF adapter. Within my CentOS installation the drive is
> detected correctly as ide_cf and all partitions are shown
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 01:43 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:30:44 -0500:
>
> > According to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg .. the file that actually gets updated on
> > x86
> > and x86_64 systems is /boot/grub/grub.conf
>
> And as I already mentioned in my first pos
I have heard rumours from some Red Hat employees that IPA will be
integrated into Spacewalk this was about 1.5 months ago which would
also make sense since Spacewalk is supposed to be their single point
of management tool.
But as I said it's rumours.
Regards
Per Qvindesland
--- Original message
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> But as the installer does not ship the necessary modules for a pcmcia
> ide installation i am searching for a way to either add these, or to
> prepare the device from my box within a chroot environment.
What drivers / modules are these ?
- KB
__
David Lemcoe wrote:
> When I went "yum install vsftpd.i386", I get this:
> > TypeError: unsubscriptable object
>
> >From what I can see, this looks like an error with Python 2.4, but I don't
> know what to do
> Any help?
Run "yum clean metadata" and try again.
Ralph
pgpZAvzOQUJfE.pgp
Descripti
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I want to update my CF-Microdrive for my router with CentOS (currently
> there is Slacky on it). I have attached the microdrive to my notebook
> using a pcmcia CF adapter. Within my CentOS installation the drive is
> detected correctly as ide_cf and all pa
Blake Hudson wrote:
> Google indicates "Requested Range Not Satisfiable" is actually an HTTP
> error (not specific to yum). The description of the error indicates that
> my browser (yum) requested a segment of the file that does not exist...
> e.g, bytes 10-1000 of a 100 byte file. I'm thinking
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:26 +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant
> > thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS
> >
> > http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5
> >
> > whic
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:24 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant
> > thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS
> >
> > http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5
> >
>
> Tha
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Craig White schrieb:
> >
> >
> > Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is
> > < 50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to
> > justfiy.
> >
>
> In that case, shelling out the 7-
Hi,
I'm just wondering when centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.src.rpm will be
pushed out to the mirrors as it is currently missing.
Thanks,
Jeff
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Jeff Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering when centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.src.rpm will be
> pushed out to the mirrors as it is currently missing.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
SRPMs are syncing to mirrors and some packages are still missing (for
example anaconda) ... they'll land on the mirror
Hi,
I have an HP MSA 2000i as SAN (iSCSI) and since I'm starting with SANs,
I'm seeking for advice. We are currently using HP Proliant 380 G5 + MSA
70 (SAS, direct-attached storage) for our production servers.
At first, I thought I'd be using the SAN only for non-critical
oper
I tried it a year or so ago and had some luck building version 3.6, but was
having issues with the web admin bombing out trying to administer users.
What I remember from then was I pulled in a bit of the mono stuff from
fedora, pulling in dependencies as I found them from fedora or openSUSE (if
ne
Doh,
I could not find the source code on the www.ifolder.com website for the
current version ... the only place I could find recent source code was the
opensuse build factory.
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dl9pf/openSUSE_10.3/src/
Anybody have a link to the sources they are distr
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Craig White schrieb:
Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is
< 50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to
justfiy.
In that case, shelling ou
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:01:43 -0400:
> Hmmm... Maybe the *64 systems are different?
No, they are the same in this respect. I'm not seeing any difference.
There is a difference between systems (no matter which arch) when the
/etc/grub.conf symlink got created.
On all my sys
Dear Glenn,
> This may be of interest to you: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/ManualInstall
>
>
> I haven't gotten around to fixing up some of the remarks made by others, but
> you should get the general idea.
Thanks for that. I am going to check and maybe fix some of the topics
if it's okay for y
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:39:27 -0400:
> The installonlypkgs and installonly_limit keywords. The first, according
> to man yum.conf, defaults to kernel, kernel-smp, kernel-bigmem,
> kernel-enterprise, kernel-debug, kernel-unsupported and the latter to 3.
It seems to default t
Have you browsed the LDAP entries in ActiveDirectory to see if they
match similar entries for working windows hosts. Under the computer
entry, look carefully at dnsHostname and servicePrincipalName. For a
server, there are many many entries for these two variables. CIFS/x2,
HOSTx2, LDAPS?/,
Michael Peterson wrote:
> The error message is:
>
> Error Downloading Packages:
> kernel - 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686: failure:
> RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128-1.6.el5.i686.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No
> more mirrors to try.
Please paste the content of the file /tmp/yuminstall.txt after you ran
yum
I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is
giving me some grief. See errors below.
Googling for "Package does not match intended download" turns up a bunch
of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offers any working solution.
Can someone suggest how to overcome the fol
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:27AM -0400, fred smith wrote:
> I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is
> giving me some grief. See errors below.
>
> Googling for "Package does not match intended download" turns up a bunch
> of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offe
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply!
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:27AM -0400, fred smith wrote:
> > I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is
> > giving me some grief. See errors below.
> >
> > Googling for "Package d
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==>5.3 upgrade
From: fred smith
To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:37:57 AM
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply!
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:5
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:47:12AM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==>5.3 upgrade
> From: fred smith
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:37:57 AM
> >On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Tru Hu
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090408/a436176a/attachment-0001.bin
--
Rob Kampen wrote:
> I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and
> thought "At Last" something that brings together all the bits for the
> little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball.
> I have tried OpenLDAP and currently have a CentOS-DS running but am
Blake Hudson wrote:
>
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does not match intended download
>>>
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==>5.3 upgrade
From: fred smith
To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:58:28 AM
but since the file appears to download fine, it wouldn't be a case of
"not on mirror", would it?
I worked around
Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
build it it keeps failing here:
Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
‘TrueCrypt::SharedPtr
TrueCrypt::EncryptionOptionsWizardPage::GetEncryptionAlgorithm() const’:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:11 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Rob Kampen wrote:
> > I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and
> > thought "At Last" something that brings together all the bits for the
> > little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball.
> >
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
] build it it keeps failing here:
]
] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
] ?TrueCrypt::SharedPtr
] TrueCrypt::
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
] build it it keeps failing here:
]
] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
] ?TrueCrypt::SharedPtr
] TrueCrypt::
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and
>> thought "At Last" something that brings together all the bits for the
>> little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball.
>> I have tried OpenLDAP and currently have a CentOS-DS run
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:22:05PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> James Pearson wrote:
> > Is there _any_ chance the 5.3 SRPMS could be made available somehow -
> > e.g. on a single server, before they are pushed out to the mirrors?
> >
> > I would like to have a look at a couple of CentOS modifi
Craig White wrote:
>
> All of the networks that I have setup and maintain use LDAP for
> authentication (Linux/Macintosh/Windows) and use a Samba PDC/BDC, DNS,
> DHCP, etc. and in fact, use the same users $HOME directory regardless of
> which OS they log into. I have also adapted automounts for L
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:36 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> >
> > I don't have much interest in SME myself. FreeIPA seemed to have the
> > whole bundle.
>
> The place where SME becomes interesting is where someone who doesn't
> know Linux wants a server for a home or small of
Benjamin Karhan wrote:
> A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
>
> ] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
> ] build it it keeps failing here:
> ]
> ] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
> ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
>
Benjamin Karhan wrote:
> A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
>
> ] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
> ] build it it keeps failing here:
> ]
> ] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
> ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
>
Alford, Seth wrote:
> I'm looking for the anaconda source rpm. Yes, I know, it's
> available from the upstream vendor.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12378998/com/anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm.html
this site seems to have it:
ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/os/Linux/distributio
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] thanks again.
] I installed wxWidgets 2.8.10 without apparent incident. I'll check
] around to see if there
] is a problem there.
i recompiled truecypt again (just to make sure it still works fine...
it did)... anyways, just FYI i pass the follo
on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
> I got the DKMS-system working and now have the Nvidia-drivers v173.08
> installed (using rpmforge as suggested previously). Unfortunately this
> particular driver version gives me screen artifacts so as to make the screen
> more or less unrea
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:19:42PM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==>5.3 upgrade
> From: fred smith
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:58:28 AM
> >
> >
> >but since the file appears to download f
on 4-6-2009 9:32 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following:
> Just looking around at log files and other places, I noticed today that
> there are still a lot of people installing and downloading 5.2.
>
> While a large number of installs would be since people already have the
> 5.2 media - thats fine
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
>> My question is who updates those drivers, as the v173.08 Nvidia drivers are
>> now almost a year old? Would there be any other good repo with more current
>> drivers suitable for use with
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, fred smith
wrote:
> I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file
> from one of the mirrors, did "rpm -uvh" on it followed by "yum -y update"
> and it all applied without complaint.
Please do NOT install the kernel with the -Uvh option.
on 4-7-2009 2:16 PM Robert spake the following:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>>
>>> Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500:
>>>
>>>
/etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some
reas
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, fred smith wrote:
...
> Since the error says "did not match intended download" I'm guessing that
> some of the metadata contains the sha1sum (or similar) and the downloaded
> file had the wrong sum. I'm further guessing that it may be an error in
> the metadata (if that'
Benjamin Karhan wrote:
> A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
>
> ] thanks again.
> ] I installed wxWidgets 2.8.10 without apparent incident. I'll check
> ] around to see if there
> ] is a problem there.
>
> i recompiled truecypt again (just to make sure it still works fine...
> it di
<>
> Has anyone looked at the version of ClarkConnect now in beta? This is
> similar to SME but perhaps a more modern approach (and with separate
> free/commercial versions...). The blurb claims that the initial setup
> provides LDAP authentication for easy expansion. That's something I've
>
Michael Simpson wrote:
> My fiance (who is the artistic one of the family) thinks the new
> graphics are beautiful and i agree with her.
Me too! I checked the artwork when it was announced and I liked it
already then. Great work and thanks to all involved!
--
//Morten
_
Just wondering (I hate asking this, but in case they slipped by) if
there is an ETA on some missing updates (as newer ones are appearing)
including:
firefox-3.0.7-1.el5
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0315.html
thunderbird-2.0.0.21-1.el5 (the latest 5.3 RPM is 2.0.0.18 whereas the
lates
2009/4/1 Ralph Angenendt :
> Steve Snyder wrote:
>> It seems that the mirrors are now all sync'd with the binary RPMs, but
>> where are the source packages?
>>
>> The source RPMs are available for the few packages updated since the
>> upstream 5.3 release, but the SRPMS for the release itself are
>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Michael Holmes
wrote:
>
> Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing
> as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source
> is what the GPL focuses on.
>
Please read the first few messages in the beginning of this thre
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:32:36 +0100
Michael Holmes wrote:
> Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing
> as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source
> is what the GPL focuses on.
I'm not any kind of a legal expert, but I suspect that the concep
Morten Torstensen wrote:
> Michael Simpson wrote:
>
>> My fiance (who is the artistic one of the family) thinks the new
>> graphics are beautiful and i agree with her.
>>
>
> Me too! I checked the artwork when it was announced and I liked it
> already then. Great work and thanks to all inv
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 April 2009, fred smith wrote:
> ...
> > Since the error says "did not match intended download" I'm guessing that
> > some of the metadata contains the sha1sum (or similar) and the downloaded
> > file had the wrong s
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:48:39AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, fred smith
> wrote:
>
> > I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file
> > from one of the mirrors, did "rpm -uvh" on it followed by "yum -y update"
> > and it all applied wi
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote:
>>> Downloading Packages:
>>> (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41
>>> http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
>>> [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download
>>> Try
Original Message
Subject: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==>5.3 upgrade
From: R P Herrold
To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:58:09 PM
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote:
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=|
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==>5.3 upgrade
From: Blake Hudson
To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:12:25 PM
Original Message
Subject: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==>5.3 upgrade
From: R P Herrold
To: CentOS maili
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote:
>
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does not matc
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Any reason these bad mirrors are not pulled out of the
> rotation? I had no idea that a single old mirror would stop
> yum in its tracks.
They are. The offending mirror was identified as stale by the
mirrorlist system, and has aged out at this point
Am 08.04.2009 um 19:30 schrieb Les Mikesell:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>> I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA
>>> and
>>> thought "At Last" something that brings together all the bits for
>>> the
>>> little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the bal
81 matches
Mail list logo
