On 25 November 2013 01:08, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'd like to run SELinux on my CentOS server in enforcing mode,
> but I get the above message when I run sealert.
> I assume this is because I am accessing the server from my laptop?
>
> In any case, I googled for the message,
> and this threw up
Wes James wrote:
> Is there a way to get CentOS 6.4 to wrap from last to first or first to
> last workspace when moving with ctl-alt left/right arrow? I right clicked
> on the workspace view at the bottom right and selected Preferences, but
> there are now options for that.
We had to patch metaci
James Hogarth wrote:
>> I'd like to run SELinux on my CentOS server in enforcing mode,
>> but I get the above message when I run sealert.
>> I assume this is because I am accessing the server from my laptop?
..
>> Am I right in thinking the message arises from my remote connection?
>> And if so, i
From: Steve Clark
> We have about 1000 FW-7535s (replaced by FW-7541) deployed using
> CentOS 6.x.
I finally chose to go with the microserver...
I have a hard time finding a simple price for the lanner appliance (without
having to fill some huge forms to get a quotation...)
And last time, when
Hello All,
I set up ltsp regulary, on Centos6 machines.
This morning I have a Selinux problem that usualy does not occur:
after setting everything up, the thinclients boot, but nobody can login.
It only works after the command :
# echo 0 > /selinux/enforce
I tried this semanage command:
# sem
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 01:25 PM, Chris Beattie wrote:
>> On 11/22/2013 11:29 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
>>> Most of us using CentOS/RHEL are in an "e"nterprise environment where
>>> that sort of thing just isn't allowed.
>>>
>>> A supported, updated, se
On 25 November 2013 11:15, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
>
> >> I'd like to run SELinux on my CentOS server in enforcing mode,
> >> but I get the above message when I run sealert.
> >> I assume this is because I am accessing the server from my laptop?
> ..
> >> Am I right in thinki
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:07:21AM -0500, Phelps, Matt wrote:
>
> I was hoping there would eventually be a gcc47 in EPEL or some other
> repository that may help the situation.
gcc47 is available in devtools-1.1 (not out of testing)
gcc48 will be available in devtools-2.0
Cheers,
Tru
--
Tru H
On Sun, November 24, 2013 20:08, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'd like to run SELinux on my CentOS server in enforcing mode,
> but I get the above message when I run sealert.
> I assume this is because I am accessing the server from my laptop?
>
> In any case, I googled for the message,
> and this thre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2013 08:50 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Sun, November 24, 2013 20:08, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I'd like to run SELinux on my CentOS server in enforcing mode, but I get
>> the above message when I run sealert. I assume this is because I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2013 07:26 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I set up ltsp regulary, on Centos6 machines.
>
> This morning I have a Selinux problem that usualy does not occur: after
> setting everything up, the thinclients boot, but nobody can log
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> BTW, I like chrome, so that is why I am trying to maintain this ... but
> it is GOOGLE who is not maintaining the code to work on EL.
> [snip]
I appreciate your efforts on getting it working previously.
At my office there are a bunch o
> The message I'm now seeing in /var/log/audit/audit.log :
>
> type=AVC msg=audit(1385112688.399:67769): avc: denied { write } for
> pid=8218 comm="xauth" name="caw" dev=md1 ino=262145
> scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:xauth_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 tcl
On my new Haswell-based machines, I am occasionally seeing entries like the
following in /var/log/messages:
kernel: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
(I would not have even noticed them, except that they get flagged by logwatch.)
These messages always occur alone, and don't seem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2013 09:03 AM, ? wrote:
>> The message I'm now seeing in /var/log/audit/audit.log :
>>
>> type=AVC msg=audit(1385112688.399:67769): avc: denied { write } for
>> pid=8218 comm="xauth" name="caw" dev=md1 ino=262145
>> scont
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wes James"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November, 2013 12:03:15 PM
> Subject: [CentOS] Finally CentOS on iMac core 2
>
> I've been trying several combinations of OSX, CentOS
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/24/2013 9:45 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> CentOS 6.4 died on me again.
>
> only time that has EVER happened to me, on dozens and dozens of systems,
> has been when there's been a serious hardware problem.
I really do not know whether to hope you
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:22 AM, James Pearson
wrote:
> Wes James wrote:
> > Is there a way to get CentOS 6.4 to wrap from last to first or first to
> > last workspace when moving with ctl-alt left/right arrow? I right
> clicked
> > on the workspace view at the bottom right and selected Preferenc
Op 25-11-13 15:10, Daniel J Walsh schreef:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/25/2013 09:03 AM, ? wrote:
>>> The message I'm now seeing in /var/log/audit/audit.log :
>>>
>>> type=AVC msg=audit(1385112688.399:67769): avc: denied { write } for
>>> pid=8218
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 11/24/2013 9:45 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>> CentOS 6.4 died on me again.
>>
>> only time that has EVER happened to me, on dozens and dozens of systems,
>> has been when there's been a
> thanks for the replies.
>
> I did test this with other then root user.
>
> Trying with restorecon -R -v /home
I was wrong.
At least should have checked the labels before writing a quick response.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
On 11/25/2013 08:22, Wes James wrote:
> Oh. OK. I didn't realize CentOS wasn't using grub2. Are there any plans
> for CentOS to move to grub2?
No. Upstream uses grub1, so CentOS uses grub1.
Presumably RHEL7 will use grub2, but there's no good reason to hold your
breath waiting for it.
__
Wes James wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
>> From: "Wes James"
>>
>> I've been trying several combinations of OSX, CentOS to try and get
>> CentOS installed on an old iMac. I finally first installed OS X, then
installed
>> CentOS in the open space after OS X. With r
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 11/24/2013 9:45 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>> CentOS 6.4 died on me again.
>>
>> only time that has EVER happened to me, on dozens and dozens of systems,
>> has been when there's been a serious hardware problem.
>
> I reall
Hello All!
I have a lot of virtual machines with KVM hypervizor. For VM's disks I
use LVM Volumes. It's more suitable to install virtual machines direct
to the LV-volumes without making partition tables inside the LV. In
this case it is very simple to perform online-resizing and mount
snapsho
P.S. At this time my host OS and virtual machines (guests) are ubuntu
12.04. Also I want to have some virtual machines running CentOS 6
On 25.11.2013 20:28, Халезов Иван wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I have a lot of virtual machines with KVM hypervizor. For VM's disks I
> use LVM Volumes. It's more su
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Michael Hennebry
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/24/2013 9:45 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
CentOS 6.4 died on me again.
>>>
>>> only time that has EVER happened to me, on dozens
Wes James wrote:
>
> You mean you have a patch for metacity to allow compiz to work? It works
> in virtualbox?
No, I have simple patch to allow metacity to wrap workspaces (nothing to
do with compiz)
James Pearson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cento
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, James Pearson
wrote:
> Wes James wrote:
> >
> > You mean you have a patch for metacity to allow compiz to work? It works
> > in virtualbox?
>
> No, I have simple patch to allow metacity to wrap workspaces (nothing to
> do with compiz)
>
> James Pearson
>
>
>
I'd b
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> >> Keep an eagle eye on dmesg and the logs. If you can, bring
>> machine down and run memtest86 for a few hours (say, when you go to
>
> I've run the memory test that comes with the Fedora 13 install disk.
> My computer's memory got
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Michael Hennebry
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
>>>
On 11/24/2013 9:45 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> CentOS 6.4 died on
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 11/24/2013 9:45 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
CentOS 6.4 died on me again.
>>>
>>> only time that has EVER happened to me, on dozens and dozens of systems,
>>> has been whe
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Халезов Иван wrote:
> P.S. At this time my host OS and virtual machines (guests) are ubuntu
> 12.04. Also I want to have some virtual machines running CentOS 6
>
> On 25.11.2013 20:28, Халезов Иван wrote:
> > Hello All!
> >
> > I have a lot of virtual machines w
I am in the process of getting multiple Desktops to run linuxfor Research
and Development, at the moment am comparing the following intel chipset
H81, Q87, Q77, H61...What is the difference?What would be best performance
issue?
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
I think you are asking if it is possible to install centos virtual
machines without partitioning its LVM block device. I think you do not
want to use any partitioning or LVM within your virtual machine?
Yes, this is possible however it is annoying to make work as, iirc,
the anaconda installer requ
http://ark.intel.com/compare/52806,64027,75007,75016
Does this comparison tool help?
On 25 November 2013 17:54, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am in the process of getting multiple Desktops to run linuxfor Research
> and Development, at the moment am comparing the following intel chipset
> H81, Q8
On 11/25/2013 8:58 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> The computer is a DakTEch Freedom 4 P4 DDR System.
> The system board is a D865GBFL w/LAN,audio & video
> Processor Intel Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz 800FSB
> I got it in 2006.
its past the age where components are starting to fail. I'd suspect
the capacit
On 11/25/2013 9:54 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am in the process of getting multiple Desktops to run linuxfor Research
> and Development, at the moment am comparing the following intel chipset
> H81, Q87, Q77, H61...What is the difference?What would be best performance
> issue?
the ?8? chipse
Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>>> On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/24/2013 9:45 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> CentOS 6.4 died on me again.
only time that has EVER happened to me, on dozens and do
Can I say H61 < Q77 < Q87 < H81 ?
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:24 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 9:54 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I am in the process of getting multiple Desktops to run linuxfor Research
> > and Development, at the moment am comparing the following intel chipset
>
On 11/25/2013 10:49 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Can I say H61 < Q77 < Q87 < H81 ?
kinda hard to compare apples and pomegranates. FIRST, choose your CPU,
*THEN* compare the chipsets that will work with it.If you're buying
tires for a 2013 Mercedes, there's little point at looking at sp
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> The computer is a DakTEch Freedom 4 P4 DDR System.
>> The system board is a D865GBFL w/LAN,audio & video
>> Processor Intel Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz 800FSB
>> I got it in 2006.
>
> It is getting long in the tooth. (I'm about to r
On 11/26/2013 05:28 AM, Халезов Иван wrote:
>
> Is it possible to install CentOS 6 without disk partitioning?
Yes, it is, but there are a couple of caveats:
1. You can't use anaconda to do so directly.
2. You can't boot through grub (as someone else pointed out). You can
boot the kernel dire
Hi All, I'm trying to set up a Captive Portal using a Centos6 box. I've
been experimenting with WiFiDog but it looks like development has
faltered and I'm chasing my tail getting all the bits of PHP together
for it to run. Some bits I've got look like Alpha code.
What I'm trying to accomplish i
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules is your friend
the device names defined in there are set nice and early during boot,
well before any ifcfg scripts
K
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty L
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
wrote:
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules is your friend
>
> the device names defined in there are set nice and early during boot,
> well before any ifcfg scripts
If you clone a multi-homed KVM guest or copy the underlying disk
image, is
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Kahlil Hodgson <
kahlil.hodg...@dealmax.com.au> wrote:
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules is your friend
>
> the device names defined in there are set nice and early during boot,
> well before any ifcfg scripts
>
Precisely.
Something changed between 6.3
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> Hi All, I'm trying to set up a Captive Portal using a Centos6 box. I've
> been experimenting with WiFiDog but it looks like development has
> faltered and I'm chasing my tail getting all the bits of PHP together
> for it to run. Some bits I've g
I recently purchased a set of ASRock Intel i5 MB/CPU combos for a budget
compute cluster. Every time we load up a system and try to boot with a
recent EL6/64 ISO, we get a message that reads:
> This hardware (or a combination thereof) is not supported by CentOS.
For more
> information on supp
On 11/25/2013 4:42 PM, Lists wrote:
> I recently purchased a set of ASRock Intel i5 MB/CPU combos for a budget
> compute cluster. Every time we load up a system and try to boot with a
> recent EL6/64 ISO, we get a message that reads:
>
> > This hardware (or a combination thereof) is not supported
James Hogarth wrote:
>> >> I'd like to run SELinux on my CentOS server in enforcing mode,
>> >> but I get the above message when I run sealert.
>> >> I assume this is because I am accessing the server from my laptop?
>> ..
>> >> Am I right in thinking the message arises from my remote connection?
-How to install CentOS on 27” imac (Mid 2010 - 2.93 Ghz, i7, 8gig ram)
with OS X and Xubuntu 13.04 already installed
Assumed - OS X and Xubuntu already installed and rEFIt already installed in
OS X with the line towards the bottom of:
/efi/refit/refit.conf
set to:
default_selection L
on the m
This time when it died, the green light on my monitor stayed green,
but the screen went black.
I could not switch virtual terminals or kill the server.
--
Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"On Monday, I'm gonna have to tell my kindergarten class,
whom I teach not to run with scissors,
that
Examine the electrolytic capacitors on the motherboard...
are any of them bulging on their tops?
Or leaking oily/tar-like gunk?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
54 matches
Mail list logo
