[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On Jul 3, 2024 5:59 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > Replacing the tar file is problematic too, if only because it's a potential > source of confusion for people who aren't paying attention. It'd be really the worst thing to do. > I'm not sure I believe that making this next release

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:17 AM Casey Bodley wrote: > (cc Thomas Goirand) > > in April, an 18.2.3 tarball was uploaded to > https://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ceph_18.2.3.orig.tar.gz. that's been > picked up and packaged by the Debian project under the assumption that it > was a supported release

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Hi Yuri, On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 7:28 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > We built a new branch with all the cherry-picks on top > (https://pad.ceph.com/p/release-cherry-pick-coordination). > > I am rerunning fs:upgrade: > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2024-07-10_13:47:23-fs:upgrade-reef-release-distro

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:58 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > We built a new branch with all the cherry-picks on top > (https://pad.ceph.com/p/release-cherry-pick-coordination). > > I am rerunning fs:upgrade: > > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2024-07-10_13:47:23-fs:upgrade-reef-release-distro-default-

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

We built a new branch with all the cherry-picks on top (https://pad.ceph.com/p/release-cherry-pick-coordination). I am rerunning fs:upgrade: https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2024-07-10_13:47:23-fs:upgrade-reef-release-distro-default-smithi/ Venky, pls review it after it's done. Neha, do you want t

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

this was discussed in the ceph leadership team meeting yesterday, and we've agreed to re-number this release to 18.2.4 On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:08 PM wrote: > > > On Jul 3, 2024 5:59 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > > > > > Replacing the tar file is problematic too, if only because it's a pot

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Hi Yuri, On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 7:36 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > After fixing the issues identified below we cherry-picked all PRs from > this list for 18.2.3 > https://pad.ceph.com/p/release-cherry-pick-coordination. > > The question to the dev leads: do you think we can proceed with the > relea

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

(cc Thomas Goirand) in April, an 18.2.3 tarball was uploaded to https://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ceph_18.2.3.orig.tar.gz. that's been picked up and packaged by the Debian project under the assumption that it was a supported release when we do finally release 18.2.3, we will presumably overwrite

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

After fixing the issues identified below we cherry-picked all PRs from this list for 18.2.3 https://pad.ceph.com/p/release-cherry-pick-coordination. The question to the dev leads: do you think we can proceed with the release without rerunning suites, as they were already approved? Please reply wi

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Please see the update from Laura below for the status of this release. Dev Leads help is appreciated to expedite fixes necessary to publish it soon. "Hi all, we have hit another blocker with this release. Due to centos 8 stream going end of life, we only have the option of releasing centos 9 str

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Rados results were approved, and we successfully upgraded the gibba cluster. Now waiting on @Dan Mick to upgrade the LRC. On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:32 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > I reran rados on the fix https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/57794/commits > and seeking approvals from Radek and Laur

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

I reran rados on the fix https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/57794/commits and seeking approvals from Radek and Laure https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65393#note-1 On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 2:12 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > We have discovered some issues (#1 and #2) during the final stages of > testi

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

We have discovered some issues (#1 and #2) during the final stages of testing that require considering a delay in this point release until all options and risks are assessed and resolved. We will keep you all updated on the progress. Thank you for your patience! #1 https://tracker.ceph.com/issue

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

We've run into a problem during the last verification steps before publishing this release after upgrading the LRC to it => https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65733 After this issue is resolved, we will continue testing and publishing this point release. Thanks for your patience! On Thu, Apr 18, 2

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On 18.04.24 8:13 PM, Laura Flores wrote: Thanks for bringing this to our attention. The leads have decided that since this PR hasn't been merged to main yet and isn't approved, it will not go in v18.2.3, but it will be prioritized for v18.2.4. I've already added the PR to the v18.2.4 milestone s

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Hi Christian, Thanks for bringing this to our attention. The leads have decided that since this PR hasn't been merged to main yet and isn't approved, it will not go in v18.2.3, but it will be prioritized for v18.2.4. I've already added the PR to the v18.2.4 milestone so it's sure to be picked up.

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Hey Laura, On 17.04.24 4:58 PM, Laura Flores wrote: There are two PRs that were added later to the 18.2.3 milestone concerning debian packaging: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+milestone%3Av18.2.3 The user is asking if these can be included. I know everybody always want

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Hey all, I wanted to point out a message on the user list: https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@ceph.io/message/KJXKJ2WR5PRQMWXIL33BKCSXJT7Q6VUA/ There are two PRs that were added later to the 18.2.3 milestone concerning debian packaging: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?q=is%3Apr+i

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 12:08 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65393#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > smoke - infra issues, still trying, Laura PTL > > rados - Radek,

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Hi Yuri, On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 7:52 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > And approval is needed for: > > fs - Venky approved? fs approved. failures are: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/cephfs/wiki/Reef#2024-04-17 > powercycle - seems fs related, Venky, Brad PTL > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:55 PM Y

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

> > Orchestrator: > 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64208 - test_cephadm.sh: Container > version mismatch causes job to fail. > Not a blocker issue. Just a problem with the test itself that will be fixed by https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/56714 O

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 7:52 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > And approval is needed for: > > fs - Venky approved? Could not get to this today. Will be done tomorrow. > powercycle - seems fs related, Venky, Brad PTL > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:55 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > > > Still waiting for

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On behalf of @Radoslaw Zarzynski , rados approved. Below is the summary of the rados suite failures, divided by component. @Adam King @Venky Shankar PTAL at the orch and cephfs failures to see if they are blockers. Failures, unrelated: RADOS: 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65183 - Over

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

And approval is needed for: fs - Venky approved? powercycle - seems fs related, Venky, Brad PTL On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:55 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Still waiting for approvals: > > rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? > > ceph-volume issue was fixed by https://github.com/cep

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

Still waiting for approvals: rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? ceph-volume issue was fixed by https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/56857 We plan not to upgrade the LRC to 18.2.3 as we are very close to the first squid RC and will be using it for this purpose. Please speak up if th

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

smoke approved. Infrastructure: 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64727 - suites/dbench.sh: Socket exception: No route to host (113) On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 2:08 PM Adam King wrote: > orch approved > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 2:38 PM Yuri Weinstein > wrote: > >> Details of this release ar

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

orch approved On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 2:38 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65393#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > smoke - infra issues, still trying, Laura PTL > > r

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 2:38 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65393#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > smoke - infra issues, still trying, Laura PTL > > rados - Radek,

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.3 QE validation status

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 8:38 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65393#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > smoke - infra issues, still trying, Laura PTL > > rados - Radek,