https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96120
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95885
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
I guess I will proceed with revert, I don't know meaning that failed assert in
the test, and expected ownership of EmbedAnnotationData is not clear to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
vitalybuka wrote:
The patch is large, so I'll take another look, if there is a trivial fix.
So please approve without merging.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
vitalybuka wrote:
Actually I will try myself, as I have access to the bot.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
Try `// UNSUPPORTED: hwasan`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
> @vitalybuka could it be a ccache glitch?
Technically can, but I would not count on hash collision :)
Also there are two machines running same config consistently fail.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
___
vitalybuka wrote:
Not sure, nothing in cmake cmd:
```
cmake -DLLVM_APPEND_VC_REV=OFF -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
-DLLVM_CCACHE_BUILD=ON -DLLVM_USE_LINKER=lld -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=OFF
vitalybuka wrote:
It's broken here https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/236/builds/11633
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89811
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1509,6 +1511,11 @@ void DarwinClang::AddLinkRuntimeLibArgs(const ArgList
,
AddLinkSanitizerLibArgs(Args, CmdArgs, "asan");
}
vitalybuka wrote:
Driver needs tests
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
vitalybuka wrote:
If you want another round, make sure to click `re-request review`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93783
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
Internally ::allocate uses sided new:
```
void*
allocate(size_t __bytes, size_t __alignment = _S_max_align)
__attribute__((__returns_nonnull__,__alloc_size__(2),__alloc_align__(3)))
{ return ::operator new(__bytes, do_allocate(__bytes, __alignment)); }
```
vitalybuka wrote:
> > > Based on my rough understanding, this is expected?
> >
> >
> > What do you mean?
> > Isn't this test needs to be updated or disabled?
>
> I think this ASAN failure is not caused by this PR because these memorys are
> allocated/deallocated by
100% sure by this PR
vitalybuka wrote:
> Based on my rough understanding, this is expected?
What do you mean?
Isn't this test needs to be updated or disabled?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
vitalybuka wrote:
This one is broken https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/builds/20461
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-05-19T06:21:40-07:00
New Revision: c587483da0b50efa04146fde205da1d16731e12e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c587483da0b50efa04146fde205da1d16731e12e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c587483da0b50efa04146fde205da1d16731e12e.diff
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-05-19T05:44:40-07:00
New Revision: 6447abe067c8088a5cc093fe872719374e174068
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6447abe067c8088a5cc093fe872719374e174068
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6447abe067c8088a5cc093fe872719374e174068.diff
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-05-19T05:44:40-07:00
New Revision: ed9007d0d219726db01f211e9c9ab72fbfe4ecb1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ed9007d0d219726db01f211e9c9ab72fbfe4ecb1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ed9007d0d219726db01f211e9c9ab72fbfe4ecb1.diff
https://github.com/vitalybuka commented:
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91032
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
> Greetings and hello from the UK!
>
> it looks as though this commit caused a test failure on the following build
> bot, is anyone able to take a look see?
>
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/65066
>
> Will give it an hour for a reply before looking at
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91141
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91141
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
Yes, its there
but it's too late
we can't cast to enum invalid values
it should be like:
```
unsigned MapType = getOpenMPSimpleClauseType(
OMPC_map, PP.getSpelling(Tok), P.getLangOpts());
if (MapType == OMPC_MAP_to || MapType == OMPC_MAP_from ||
MapType ==
vitalybuka wrote:
```
diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenMP.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenMP.cpp
index 53d89ce2fa3e..1a4442f38f6d 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenMP.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenMP.cpp
@@ -4326,6 +4326,7 @@ static OpenMPMapClauseKind isMapType(Parser ) {
vitalybuka wrote:
> > 7c28408
>
> good point, maybe not, I scheduled it as with, without rebase. Let's try
> again.
Still fails after rebase https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/43115
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90935
___
vitalybuka wrote:
> > BTW, Hi @vitalybuka, do you know how to reproduce the problem with
> > sanitizer build? Thanks.
>
> There is a basic instruction, should work with Linux
> https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/SanitizerBotReproduceBuild I guess
> this issue should be detectable with
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90935
>From 8468a10bf34e4c432b181d40c370043ad21b5801 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jyu2-git
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 20:55:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "Revert "[OpenMP][TR12] change property of map-type
vitalybuka wrote:
> 7c28408
good point, maybe not, I scheduled it as with, without rebase.
Let's try again.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90935
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
vitalybuka wrote:
> Looks broken
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/43104/steps/9/logs/stdio
This is special build from this PR see `git status` here
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/43104/steps/6/logs/stdio
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90935
https://github.com/vitalybuka requested changes to this pull request.
Looks broken
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/43104/steps/9/logs/stdio
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90935
___
cfe-commits mailing list
vitalybuka wrote:
Please include this fix into re-land.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90800
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90885
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
> BTW, Hi @vitalybuka, do you know how to reproduce the problem with sanitizer
> build? Thanks.
There is a basic instruction, should work with Linux
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/SanitizerBotReproduceBuild
I guess this issue should be detectable with appropriate
vitalybuka wrote:
Oh, it's not landed. I looked at wrong PR. Lets revert if it can't be landed
soon.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90885
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
vitalybuka wrote:
> How long do you need?
Looks like it's landed.
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90885
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
> I already has patch in #90800 waiting for test to finish.
Fix forward is good for something < 1H, but looks like you started 19H ago.
Such cases must be reverted and then fixed.
How long do you need?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90885
vitalybuka wrote:
I am not sure what should be a correct fix, so I'll revert?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90885
Breaks
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/43086/steps/9/logs/stdio
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#90499
>From a6ca95f5e2991fb7f857f70436148a6abdecec00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
vitalybuka wrote:
Breaks https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/43086
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
> Thanks a lot, that was quick! There is another AddressSanitizer issue that
> may possibly be fixed by #90292. cc @vitalybuka
Yes, please wait for #90292.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90373
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/vitalybuka demilestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
Lets revert #90299 to recover bots before the weekend.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90299
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90299
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/builds/20063
This reverts commit cf5a8b489464d09dfdd7a48ce7c8b41d3c9bf819.
>From b4c0a3f4835a686a15a3ed90a4058f353f844f26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly
vitalybuka wrote:
It's LGTM, but it's going to be annoying to merge.
I bet this patch has several reasons to be reverted, and will be reverted
multiple times.
It would be nice to try to split into smaller parts.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81677
@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
// RUN: %p/../../../../lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_coverage_interface.inc
\
// RUN: | grep -e "INTERFACE_\(WEAK_\)\?FUNCTION"
\
// RUN: | grep -v "__sanitizer_weak_hook"
\
+//
vitalybuka wrote:
Delete uses __get_long_cap()
```
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void
__set_long_cap(size_type __s) _NOEXCEPT {
__r_.first().__l.__cap_ = __s / __endian_factor;
__r_.first().__l.__is_long_ = true;
}
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
vitalybuka wrote:
@ldionne looks like a bug in std::string
```
--- a/libcxx/include/string
+++ b/libcxx/include/string
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ public:
inline _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 ~basic_string() {
__annotate_delete();
if (__is_long())
-
vitalybuka wrote:
This is causing new/delete mismatch
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/builds/20063
```
=
==2164144==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: new-delete-type-mismatch on 0x503035b0
in thread T0:
object passed to
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87568
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89006
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
> I would not run clang-format on the revert
Done. Reverted to github generated 1d59298
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89006
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89006
>From 1d59298cd9ed21e1ac860d64f965514a577f45bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:23:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Improve stack usage to increase recursive
@@ -1163,12 +1136,7 @@ class Sema;
ConversionSequenceList
allocateConversionSequences(unsigned NumConversions) {
ImplicitConversionSequence *Conversions =
- slabAllocate(NumConversions);
-
- // Construct the new objects.
- for (unsigned I = 0;
vitalybuka wrote:
have ideas about leak, but not sure what to do with perf regression and #88330
Proposing revert https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89006
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88546
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89006
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#88546
Leak and performance regression.
Details in #88546
>From 1d59298cd9ed21e1ac860d64f965514a577f45bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:23:47
vitalybuka wrote:
A new memory leak https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/42694
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88546
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -3233,6 +3233,17 @@ Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(FunctionDecl *FDecl,
unsigned BuiltinID,
if (BuiltinCountZeroBitsGeneric(*this, TheCall))
return ExprError();
break;
+
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_allow_runtime_check: {
+Expr *Arg = TheCall->getArg(0);
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87568
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87568
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3464,6 +3464,34 @@ Query for this feature with
``__has_builtin(__builtin_trap)``.
``__builtin_arm_trap`` is lowered to the ``llvm.aarch64.break`` builtin, and
then to ``brk #payload``.
+``__builtin_allow_runtime_check``
vitalybuka wrote:
Similar
@@ -3464,6 +3464,34 @@ Query for this feature with
``__has_builtin(__builtin_trap)``.
``__builtin_arm_trap`` is lowered to the ``llvm.aarch64.break`` builtin, and
then to ``brk #payload``.
+``__builtin_allow_runtime_check``
vitalybuka wrote:
Not sure how
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87568
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88116
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
ok
please paste here what ever looks like real failure from the patch
buildbot does not sent me, as I am not on the blame list
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
I'll land after presubmit checks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka commented:
Fail i386
```
UBSan-AddressSanitizer-i386 ::
TestCases/ImplicitConversion/bitfield-conversion.c
UBSan-Standalone-i386 :: TestCases/ImplicitConversion/bitfield-conversion.c
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
vitalybuka wrote:
This is fixed version of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75481 ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
abandoning
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83470
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
I changed my design, so I don't need that change as is.
Given https://godbolt.org/z/4KfEKq7zb, I can revert your patch, or just leave
it as is. I have no preference.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83470
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87436
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
I will land, and address followup comments, if any.
It does not change behavior without -mllvm flags.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87436
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84853
>From d98585586148f2084e36d06996d6c9190cec57d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 16:32:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20ch?=
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84852
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84858
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3805,6 +3812,12 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitTrapCheck(llvm::Value *Checked,
SanitizerHandler CheckHandlerID) {
llvm::BasicBlock *Cont = createBasicBlock("cont");
+ if (ClSanitizeExpHot) {
+Checked =
+
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84858
>From 014644897f25ed88a1e17192531cf92110758470 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 16:58:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][ubsan] Switch UBSAN optimization to
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84858
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87436
>From eec9a27ff0451b923d8ca7d4ff23eb6b8dffa56c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:18:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20ch?=
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-04-04T15:54:54-07:00
New Revision: 96a99a5e2f62475f13d7ba18b15acad733909e7f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96a99a5e2f62475f13d7ba18b15acad733909e7f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/96a99a5e2f62475f13d7ba18b15acad733909e7f.diff
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87436
>From eec9a27ff0451b923d8ca7d4ff23eb6b8dffa56c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Buka
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:18:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20ch?=
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-04-03T17:48:25-07:00
New Revision: abd05eb4a53e6c7760496620da417733f52d4bf9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/abd05eb4a53e6c7760496620da417733f52d4bf9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/abd05eb4a53e6c7760496620da417733f52d4bf9.diff
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-04-02T15:47:04-07:00
New Revision: 633bc3bfda71c55bc38d5a3bfdb426bab61ff101
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/633bc3bfda71c55bc38d5a3bfdb426bab61ff101
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/633bc3bfda71c55bc38d5a3bfdb426bab61ff101.diff
vitalybuka wrote:
This failure is caused by the patch
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/239/builds/6363/steps/10/logs/stdio
cc @hctim
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65742
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
vitalybuka wrote:
This failure is caused by the patch
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/239/builds/6363/steps/10/logs/stdio
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87238
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: Vitaly Buka
Date: 2024-04-01T13:37:42-07:00
New Revision: e93b5f5a4776ffea12d03652559dfdf8d421184c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e93b5f5a4776ffea12d03652559dfdf8d421184c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e93b5f5a4776ffea12d03652559dfdf8d421184c.diff
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84851
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84851
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87213
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 682 matches
Mail list logo
