On Nov 30, 2005, at 2:59 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
I updated the StatCVS reports for GNU Classpath and Mauve:
http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/statcvs/index.html
http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/mauve/statcvs/index.html
2005 has been a good year!
I see I've fallen out of the
Hello, Mark,
XOR maybe also would be good enough, but the hashcode method is called
very seldom for this class. It is not involved into the main
functionality and is only needed in some very specific cases like
verifying the client identity. Hence the execution speed may not matter
very much;
David Gilbert wrote:
> I updated the StatCVS reports for GNU Classpath and Mauve:
>
> http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/statcvs/index.html
>
> http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/mauve/statcvs/index.html
>
> 2005 has been a good year!
>
thanks David, and thanks to all involved writ
Hi Guilhem,
> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 20:31 +0100, Guilhem Lavaux wrote:
> > So I am proposing to keep the
> > basic skeleton of the target layer but put the real code not in macro
> > but in real C functions. That way we will be able to add autoconf macros
> > without bothering the java interfac
4 matches
Mail list logo