On 16/09/14 22:04, Bill Chatfield wrote:
> I went looking for Zulu's source code. It should available since
> OpenJDK is GPLed. But they do not provide it unless you request it
> and then it looks like they only provide the parts that were based
> on GPL code, which implies that there is more code
On 09/16/2014 04:47 PM, Bill Chatfield wrote:
> OpenJDK is Linux-only. It does not work on Windows.
Huh? Since when?
Andrew.
On 06/09/14 00:36, Brian Jones wrote:
>> On Sep 5, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/05/2014 06:53 PM, Brian Jones wrote:
>>> GCJ needs to use IcedTea.
>>
>> What for?
>
> Just mean updating to OpenJDK, understanding Java 6,7,8,9,
On 09/05/2014 06:53 PM, Brian Jones wrote:
> GCJ needs to use IcedTea.
What for?
> Unfortunately the difference between most Java developers who want
> to compile Java to a native executable and a GCC hacker is vast.
Hard to argue with that.
Andrew.
On 09/05/2014 12:07 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> After reading in a previous post that Classpath was not being
> "actively developed" anymore, I said that it would be a pity to let
> the project die, and suggested that perhaps it was time to look for an
> adopter
> (http://developer.cla
On 09/04/2014 09:07 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> El jueves, 4 de septiembre de 2014, Pekka Enberg
> escribió:
>>> No, it's really not unfair at all. You are basically saying Andrew is
>>> doing a crappy job as a maintainer
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
> wrote:
>>
On 03/09/14 18:59, Per Bothner wrote:
> On 09/03/2014 09:35 AM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>> What would you like me to do? How can I help ?
>
> More useful than updating Classoath per se would be creating
> a version of GCJ that uses OpenJDK's javac for compiling to bytecodes,
Why? Eclip
Hi,
On 09/03/2014 05:35 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> 2014-09-03 18:30 GMT+02:00 Andrew Haley :
>> On 09/03/2014 05:12 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>>> 1. Development of GNU Classpath seems to be stalled now (quoting from
>>>
On 09/03/2014 05:12 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> 1. Development of GNU Classpath seems to be stalled now (quoting from
> an earlier post from Andrew Haley: "I have to tell you that Classpath
> is not being actively developed, so your problem is unlikely to be
> fixed.&
On 29/08/14 11:00, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> Yes I know that anyone can work on GNU Classpath. But as in any OSS
> project, a new project maintainer taking over "ownership" (in the OSS
> sense of the word) would need to have the approval and the support of
> the current maintainers.
That
I don't have an answer for you. Maybe someone on the Classpath list does.
But I have to tell you that Classpath is not being actively developed,
so your problem is unlikely to be fixed. You'll have to debug it
yourself or find someone to debug it. Sorry.
Andrew.
--- Begin Message ---
I create
On 04/16/2014 12:16 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> * I'm removing the check from classpath. Again, I'm
> uncertain if this is desirable. In the past, classpath changes were
> merged upstream by one of the libjava maintainers.
We should not diverge from GNU Classpath unless there is a strong reaso
On 03/29/2012 05:02 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> git push savannah master
That worked, thanks. I'm sure someone will let me know if I did
it wrong. :-)
Andrew.
On 03/29/2012 03:52 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> The CVS repository is obsolete. Current development takes place in git:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/classpath.git
>
> See this thread:
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/2012-March/003181.html
> --
zebedee:classpath $ g
There's a very odd comment in this file: it clearly refers to some
method in another file. But what was it for, anyway? Surely the
name of a method and its signature is contained in the code. I'd just
delete it.
/*
* Class: java_io_VMConsole
* Method:echo
* Signature: (Z)Z
*/
JNIEXP
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
I recently pushed a commit to gcc head and gcc-4.6 to fix the detection
of FreeBSD-10.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-11/msg00886.html
Now I see that I need to do that for libjava/classpath/configure too.
My question, how do I do that? Means, can I simply co
On 04/01/2011 08:32 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:43 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> java.lang.NumberFormatException: invalid character at position 2 in 09
>>>
>>> That's just a bug: leading zeroes in format fields aren't being handl
On 12/21/2010 07:09 AM, Rob Hammond wrote:
Hi, I wonder if anyone could help me here. I have been trying to cross
compile classpath to Freescale MCP85xx using ELDK 4.1 toolchain. The
configuration of the toolchain& of classpath looks fine ( I can
provide it if nessisary ) but when I use it in co
On 05/19/2010 09:13 PM, KessiMC wrote:
Hi everyone
Having finally become somewhat more confident in trying to cross-compile GNU
Classpath, I dastardly failed on my most recent attempt with the following
error message:
Making all in tools
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/C++/classpath/classpat
On 12/09/2010 12:45 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 09:42 Thu 09 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/08/2010 05:17 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> On 11:13 Wed 08 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>
On 12/09/2010 12:44 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 11:03 Thu 09 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
>>
>>> I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
>>> inconvenience of reading my patches in the form
On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
> inconvenience of reading my patches in the form they were attached
> and I had promised to use ".diff.txt" file extension but forgot
> about it after a long delay. (there is such problem in,
On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
> inconvenience of reading my patches in the form they were attached
> and I had promised to use ".diff.txt" file extension but forgot
> about it after a long delay. (there is such problem in,
On 12/08/2010 05:15 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> In Ivan's case, I've reviewed a number of the patches and I've had to
> do work on most of them to get them in a state where they can be
> committed. This is why I've been hesitant on giving commit access if
> the result is that it will bre
On 12/08/2010 05:17 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 11:13 Wed 08 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> I hereby offer to review some patches. Please
On 12/08/2010 01:23 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 13.03 +0000, Andrew Haley ha scritto:
>> On 12/08/2010 12:57 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
>>>
>>> If we were using mecurial we could use review board or webrew.
>>
>> We could, but these j
On 12/08/2010 12:57 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 13.45 +0200, Pekka Enberg ha scritto:
>
>> I completely agree. I have Ivan's patches locally and I'm planning to
>> go through them and resend them to the list unless he beats me to it.
>>
>>Pekka
>
On 12/08/2010 12:09 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> No need to live with it, I'll fix it up and resend.
>>
>> This is truly weird. The gcj patch says:
>>
>> 2008-05-22 Andrew Haley
>>
>>
On 12/08/2010 11:49 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> That the result is not what we get with OpenJDK. JamVM, for example,
>>> (and I guess CACAO) has fixed this in their tree as has GCJ. The test
>&g
On 12/08/2010 11:47 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/08/2010 11:23 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> In any case, even if everyone did have commit access, CVS is still
>>> painful for *local* development.
>>
>> Not for me. I mean, it'
On 12/08/2010 11:44 AM, Brian Jones wrote:
> I've only recently gone from svn to git and honestly git is freaking
> awesome sauce.
>
> I'm pretty sure what you are missing is how much nicer having local
> branches can be for local development. The cvs way would be
> multiple checkouts, and a lot
On 12/08/2010 11:37 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-November/006512.html
>>
>> What compatibility problem does this fix?
>
> That the result is not w
On 12/08/2010 11:32 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> There's also 10-15 patches from Ivan sitting in the archives
>>
>> Hmm, I had seen some discussion around those and thought they were being
>> addressed. Bring
On 12/08/2010 11:23 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
Hi.
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/08/2010 10:56 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> Anyway, I don't mind that as l
On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> I hereby offer to review some patches. Please send pointers to the
>> list.
>
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-November/006511.html
T
On 12/08/2010 10:58 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> I hereby offer to review some patches. Please send pointers to the
>> list.
>
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2010-November/
On 12/08/2010 10:56 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Anyway, I don't mind that as long as someone else does it. (Clearly,
>> the issue of developers without commit access is a red herring, as
>> every developer should hav
On 12/08/2010 10:05 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> As is, if you're going to put some time in, I'd rather it was spent
>> reviewing patches than messing about with the VCS.
>
> Point taken. In my defense, I like tinkering with "services" around the
> code base. Having autobuilders, a good dvcs integ
On 10/27/2010 12:12 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 27/10/2010 alle 12.01 +0200, Mark Wielaard ha scritto:
>
>> The event itself will be free (as in beer). See http://fosdem.org/
>
> And the beer? ;)
The beer will be expensive (as in Belgium. :)
Andrew.
Any suggestions from Classpath hackers?
Andrew.
--- Begin Message ---
Java code NoMouse.java is at the bottom of this posting.
NoMouse works with javac but not gcj.
You test by moving moving mouse in-and-out-of-window:
$ javac NoMouse.java ; java NoMouse
mouseEntered
mouseEntered
mouse
CVSROOT:/sources/classpath
Module name:classpath
Changes by: Andrew Haley 10/04/27 17:30:46
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
java/util/concurrent: CopyOnWriteArrayList.java
Log message:
2010-04-27 Andrew Haley
Obvious/trivial. remove() fails if a list is empty.
Andrew.
2010-04-27 Andrew Haley
* java/util/concurrent/CopyOnWriteArrayList.java: Fix for empty
list.
Index: java/util/concurrent/CopyOnWriteArrayList.java
PrintServiceLookup.lookupPrintServices doesn't work because of
a few holes in its implementation. Fixed thusly.
Andrew.
2010-04-27 Andrew Haley
* gnu/javax/print/ipp/IppResponse.java (parseAttributes): Handle
IppValueTag.UNKNOWN.
* gnu/javax/prin
On 04/26/2010 12:33 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 12:15 PM, Robert Lougher wrote:
>> On 26 April 2010 11:23, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 04/23/2010 06:26 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> Does anyone here have any idea how to turn on IPP logging in GNU
On 04/26/2010 12:15 PM, Robert Lougher wrote:
> On 26 April 2010 11:23, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 04/23/2010 06:26 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> Does anyone here have any idea how to turn on IPP logging in GNU Classpath?
>>> It's used like:
>>>
>>&
On 04/23/2010 06:26 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Does anyone here have any idea how to turn on IPP logging in GNU Classpath?
> It's used like:
>
> logger.log(Component.IPP, "Attribute: Name: <" +
> jobUri.getCategory()
> .getNam
Does anyone here have any idea how to turn on IPP logging in GNU Classpath?
It's used like:
logger.log(Component.IPP, "Attribute: Name: <" + jobUri.getCategory()
.getName() + "> Value: <" + jobUri.toString() + ">");
It would be very useful to enable this, but I just can't f
On 04/11/2010 04:41 PM, theUser BL wrote:
> Hopefully it don't end like with OpenGL. Since OpenGL is owned by the
> Khronos Group, I have the feeling, that the OpenGL evolution goes a lot
> slower on, then on times, where OpenGL was part of SGI (Silicon
> Graphics). Direct3D is not platforminde
On 02/13/2010 11:24 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> not sure to be on the right ML to report this behavior, please help me
> to find the right place to do it if not... and sorry for the noise.
>
> I use gcj on a LTS Ubuntu:
> gcj (Ubunt
On 12/31/2009 10:46 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 15:13 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/30/2009 10:30 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>> On 12/27/2009 10:31 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On 12/30/2009 10:30 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 12/27/2009 10:31 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>>
>>> It's been over two weeks now since I sent the proposal included below
>>
>> Gosh, two wh
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Andrew Haley :
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> 2009/10/22 Andrew Haley :
>>>> This:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef HAVE_GETPEERNAME
>>>> #ifdef HAVE_INET6
>>>> struct soc
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/10/22 Andrew Haley :
>> This:
>>
>>
>> #ifdef HAVE_GETPEERNAME
>> #ifdef HAVE_INET6
>> struct sockaddr_in6 *addr6;
>> struct sockaddr_in6 sock_storage;
>> socklen_t socklen = sizeof (struct sockaddr
This:
#ifdef HAVE_GETPEERNAME
#ifdef HAVE_INET6
struct sockaddr_in6 *addr6;
struct sockaddr_in6 sock_storage;
socklen_t socklen = sizeof (struct sockaddr_in6);
#else
struct sockaddr_in sock_storage;
socklen_t socklen = sizeof (struct sockaddr_in);
#endif /* HAVE_INET6 */
struct socka
Claude Vittoria wrote:
> I get an issue with getLocalHost. I trace and I see getLocalHostname
> return localhost and after the call at getbyname, getallbyname then
> getHostbyName !?! and fails. I see with strace a request to the
> nameserver ?!?
>
> My question why the nameserver is called to re
On 07/20/2009 08:28 AM, alk.shr wrote:
> Thanks for reply and filing bug to Bugzilla.
>
> Please tell me what extra information do you requires to test reported
> issues in the SSL? If requires, i can send you all source files of classpath
> modified by me.
>
> one more thing, i got one more issu
On 07/20/2009 05:20 AM, asutosh gopinath wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting following error when i want to build classpath-0.98 for xscale
> linux platform. Same error is throw when i try to build it for my Fedora
> linux.
>
> gcc Versions:
> arm-linux-gcc 3.4.4
>
> gcc 4.1.0
>
I think you need eithe
Deepak Sriramdas wrote:
>> We are working on an Embeeded Systems Project. In this process
>> we want to run our java jdk 1.5 compiled code on TS-Linux ARM
>> boards.But these boards seems support only Jam VM java run
>> time enviornment,which uses GNU class path libraries.Now
>> should i modify m
alk.shr wrote:
> I am getting below exception at the time of using gkeytool for generating
> key pair/certificate-
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: preInit
> at gnu.classpath.VMSystemProperties.preInit(Native Method)
> at gnu.classpath.SystemProperties.(
FYI, Classpath people. Please help!
--- Begin Message ---
Hi All,
I was recently trying to run a java project, developed for and run
with Sun's java, with the gcc compiler instead. When I first installed
the gcj available from the Ubuntu repository, I ran into compilation
erros and then realised
Manuel Lauss wrote:
>> If this works, let us know; it may be that there is a bug with using
>> gcj for in-tree compiles. There was a similar issue for older
>> versions of javac.
>
> Yes it does! However the following "gij Test" aborts with value 134;
> (it segfaults on a futex() call and is fina
Manuel Lauss wrote:
>
> Did I miss any prerequisites?
> Any help is very much appreciated!
Well, what are you trying to do? GNU Classpath usually has to be
customized for whatever runtime it's going to be running on. So,
what runtime will you use?
Andrew.
Oliver Glier wrote:
>> "On average the probability that a composite number is declared probably
>> prime
>> is significantly smaller than 4 ^ −k. Damgård, Landrock and Pomerance[4]
>> compute some explicit bounds. Such bounds can, for example, be used to
>> generate primes..."
>
> Does it mean t
Oliver Glier wrote:
> I stumbled over the following code block in the class java.math.BigInteger and
> it is not clear to me how it works:
>
>
> public BigInteger(int bitLength, int certainty, Random rnd)
> 237: {
> 238: this(bitLength, rnd);
> 239:
> 240: // Keep going until we f
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/2/4 Andrew Haley :
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> 2009/2/4 Andrew Haley :
>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>> I plan to release 0.98 on Thursday before FOSDEM, now that the
>>>>> security iss
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/2/4 Andrew Haley :
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> I plan to release 0.98 on Thursday before FOSDEM, now that the
>>> security issue has been patched:
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38417
>>&g
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> I plan to release 0.98 on Thursday before FOSDEM, now that the
> security issue has been patched:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38417
>
> If there are any major bugs that mean a release should not go ahead,
> please let me know ASAP.
I have found a d
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> What shall we do with the copy of gcjwebplugin that still remains in
> GNU Classpath? Given that development has since shifted to IcedTea,
> and then been abandoned altogether in favour of the new IcedTeaPlugin,
> I don't see any advantage in maintaining
ffileppo wrote:
> I can see that with your patch the application now doesn't
> hang anymore when highlighting and/or clicking on buttons.
> GUI performance of applications on my embbeded
> system seems also to be quite better now.
Good.
> I wonder if there's still some place for UI performance
>
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2008/11/8 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Index: gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_CairoGraphics2D.c
>>> ===
>>> --- g
Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>
> Index: gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_CairoGraphics2D.c
> ===
> --- gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_CairoGraphics2D.c (revision 141575)
> +++ gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_CairoGraphics2D.c (working copy)
Andrew Haley wrote:
> ffileppo wrote:
>>>>> Here's one improvement. If you can get rid of the places in the GTK peers
>>>>> where class and method lookups are performed at runtime you'll probably
>>>>> have a fix. This shoul
ffileppo wrote:
Here's one improvement. If you can get rid of the places in the GTK peers
where class and method lookups are performed at runtime you'll probably
have a fix. This shouldn't be a massive amount of work, just rather
boring.
In gcj,
* Compile
ffileppo wrote:
> However I'm experiencing slowness when testing some other GUI sample
> application (e.g. the test case attached at the end).
>
> In this particular test case, the application takes a lot of time to startup
> (compared to the same device, running WinCE and CrEme JVM) and during
ffileppo wrote:
>> Here's one improvement. If you can get rid of the places in the GTK peers
>> where class and method lookups are performed at runtime you'll probably
>> have a fix. This shouldn't be a massive amount of work, just rather
>> boring.
>>
>> In gcj,
>>
>> * Compiled java code is q
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Unless you --enable-java-maintainer-mode the Java file won't be recompiled.
This change is now in gcj trunk.
Andrew.
ffileppo wrote:
>> Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 09:24 +0100, ffileppo wrote:
I tried your improvement but now I'm getting Segmentation Fault whenever I
execute any GUI application.
(Non-gui code is working fine)
Do you have any idea to investigate this pr
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 09:24 +0100, ffileppo wrote:
>> I tried your improvement but now I'm getting Segmentation Fault whenever I
>> execute any GUI application.
>> (Non-gui code is working fine)
>>
>> Do you have any idea to investigate this problem?
>
> Run it under GDB an
ffileppo wrote:
>> Here's one improvement. If you can get rid of the places in the GTK peers
>> where class and method lookups are performed at runtime you'll probably
>> have a fix. This shouldn't be a massive amount of work, just rather
>> boring.
>>
>> In gcj,
>>
>> * Compiled java code is q
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> ffileppo wrote:
>>
>>> I've been investigating about performance of java code compiled with gcj on
>>> embedded systems.
>>> In particular I'm interested in testing AWT/SWING application using
>
Andrew Haley wrote:
> ffileppo wrote:
>>>> oprofile is your friend. If you can get oprofile working on your
>>>> target system, please use it and find out if it does what you need.
>>> I did it. The answer is appended.
>>>
>>> The problem
ffileppo wrote:
>>> oprofile is your friend. If you can get oprofile working on your
>>> target system, please use it and find out if it does what you need.
>> I did it. The answer is appended.
>>
>> The problem is that the program is spending almost all of the time
>> generating stack traces, mi
Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> The problem is that the program is spending almost all of the time
>>> generating stack traces, millions and millions of them.
>> And one reason for that is pointless class lookups in
>> the GTK peer code.
>>
>> Look at this:
>>
>> Java_gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_FreetypeGlyphVe
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> ffileppo wrote:
>>
>>> I've been investigating about performance of java code compiled with gcj on
>>> embedded systems.
>>> In particular I'm interested in testing AWT/SWING application using
>
Andrew Haley wrote:
> ffileppo wrote:
>
>> I've been investigating about performance of java code compiled with gcj on
>> embedded systems.
>> In particular I'm interested in testing AWT/SWING application using GTK/Xorg
>> as graphical backend
>> (t
ffileppo wrote:
> I've been investigating about performance of java code compiled with gcj on
> embedded systems.
> In particular I'm interested in testing AWT/SWING application using GTK/Xorg
> as graphical backend
> (this is the only viable solution since QT peers are not well supported).
>
>
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> What is the plan for merging to trunk?
If we're sure it fixes bugs and doesn't introduce new ones,
once it's stable we can merge. We're close, I think.
Andrew.
Forwarding to GNU Classpath; this isn't gcj-specific.
Andrew.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi everyone,
I'm doing some testing with AWT/Swing applications compiled with gcj 4.4 (which
is using classpath 0.97.2).
I'm having some troubles with the following code; it does not show
the JComponent inside
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2008/10/6 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> FAIL: java.lang.InheritableThreadLocal.simple
>>> Test timed out. Use -timeout [millis] option to change the timeout value.
>>
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> FAIL: java.lang.InheritableThreadLocal.simple
> Test timed out. Use -timeout [millis] option to change the timeout value.
This is strange, given that gcj has its own InheritableThreadLocal that
hasn't changed. I'll look.
Andrew.
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath
Module name:classpath
Changes by: Andrew Haley 08/07/01 10:43:50
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
java/lang : Long.java
Log message:
2008-07-01 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTEC
) | (-x >>> 63));
>}
Hmm, I'm not sure that explanations should be punted to unfree
documentation. If the logic is so obscure that it needs a
reference, then it perhaps should be spelled out.
I'm committing this patch.
Andrew.
2008-07-01 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL
Robert Schuster wrote:
> gcc found a problem in our native/jni/javanet/local.c.
>
> I changed it to what I think makes sense but I am not sure whether this
> is still the intended behavior.
>
> Furthermore since overrunning the bounds of a stack allocated array may
> trash other stuff on the sta
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 11:32 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> So concretely. If you find a bug in GNU Classpath, it is OK if you test
>>> against some other implementation and see what it does (run various
>>> programs and tests). It
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 23:30 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> IANAL either, but from my understanding this is not the problem. At
>> least not for contributors. The problem is copyright, and this is
>> regardless of the license, proprietary or free. If I look at Sun's code
>> an
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> To be honest, one of the greatest advantages of Mercurial for me goes
> away when someone like Savannah
> is hosting the tree i.e. the setup and maintenance costs are much
> weightier with CVS or Subversion. It means
> I know tend to put things in a repository right awa
Roman Kennke wrote:
I'm not going to try to defend the worst points of CVS, such as its
non- atomic commits; a commit should either commit all files or
fail. I use svn, and it does the right thing, more or less all the
time.
>>> And I'm not going to defend Mercurial either. I'
Roman Kennke wrote:
>
>> What do people think to the idea of switching? Maybe post 0.98?
Mercurial is a disaster as far as I can see. It doesn't seem to be
possible to work locally and merge back into the trunk without having
to do a complex and error-prone three-way merge, and
Roman Kennke wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
What do people think to the idea of switching? Maybe post 0.98?
>> Mercurial is a disaster as far as I can see. It doesn't seem to be
>> possible to work locally and merge back into the trunk without having
>> to do a complex and error-prone three-way merg
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2008/6/6 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 03:37 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>> I just noticed this announcement when submitting the n
1 - 100 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
