I believe that too.
It is not clear to me why you would need that without static typing.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:50 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken, protocols cannot be derived.
>
> David
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Cloju
Unless I'm mistaken, protocols cannot be derived.
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first
I'm trying to develop a hierarchy (of sorts) of protocols and I'm
coming at it in from a Java Perspective, which I fully understand
might be my problem. In Java, I would do something like this:
interace A {
public void aFoo();
}
interface B {
public void bFoo();
}
interfacece AB extends A, B