[CODE4LIB] IRC and mail was Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-22 Thread Karen Coyle
#x27;t answer any of these questions in this thread, or on this listserv at all, really. ) From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] on behalf of MJ Ray [m...@phonecoop.coop] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 3:55 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU S

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-22 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
estions in this thread, or on this listserv at all, really. ) From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] on behalf of MJ Ray [m...@phonecoop.coop] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 3:55 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub My

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-22 Thread MJ Ray
Shaun Ellis > If you read my email, I don't tell anyone what to use, but simply > attempt to clear up some fallacies. Distributed version control is new > to many, and I want to make sure that folks are getting accurate > information from this list. As would I. I don't think spreading misinf

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Cary Gordon
Don't you mean " I hope to see all of you there." On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, David Friggens wrote: >> If you're not willing to provide even your name to make use of a free >> service, then I dare say you are erecting your own barriers. Such is your >> choice, of course, but I don't think ot

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Kyle Banerjee
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, David Friggens wrote: > "To all the people complaining about the Code4Lib 2014 conference > being unwelcoming because of our new No Clothes Policy, I say you are > wrong. We are entitled to enact our own conditions of entry, and if > you are unwilling to front up n

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread David Friggens
> If you're not willing to provide even your name to make use of a free > service, then I dare say you are erecting your own barriers. Such is your > choice, of course, but I don't think others need to be compelled > to accommodate the barriers you create for yourself. > > And just because the term

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Devon
As far as the poetry goes, not my thing, so I don't have a comment on what is actually used. The thread appeared to fork onto a discussion about github use more generally. My apologies to all if it is still tightly coupled to the poetry thing. The rest of my comments assume the more general convers

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Tom Johnson
Devon: I don't think anyone is asking you to accommodate them in your choice of tools or even approve of what they see as barriers. This conversation started because of an understanding that the poetry folks *do want* to accommodate others' needs and preferences. Taking that assumption in hand, I

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Andrew Hankinson
> An open tool is Internet email: I can send an email from my provider > (ucop.edu) to yours (princeton.edu). A closed tool is github, where I > need a github account to send you a pull request. An open tool would > be one where I can send a pull request bitbucket to github. > (Obviously, bitbucket

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Shaun Ellis
> Once again, these are not “fallacies”: they are disagreements. When you say that "GitHub is not team-centered," it's not a disagreement; it's simply false. If you say "I don't agree with the way GitHub implements the concept of teams", then that is a disagreement. You said the first, but pe

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Erik Hetzner
At Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:29:28 -0500, Shaun Ellis wrote: > > If you read my email, I don't tell anyone what to use, but simply > attempt to clear up some fallacies. Distributed version control is new > to many, and I want to make sure that folks are getting accurate > information from this list.

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Megan O'Neill
Jonathan++ The more the merrier, says I. If we decide we need complete record of all the poetry we create at some point in the future, we can deal with that then. For right now, everybody have fun! This is supposed to be fun, right? On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Hankinson < andrew.ha

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Andrew Hankinson
Also, as a side note (and of interest to some) you *can* add pull requests to your repo: https://gist.github.com/piscisaureus/3342247 On 2013-02-21, at 10:29 AM, Shaun Ellis wrote: > If you read my email, I don't tell anyone what to use, but simply attempt to > clear up some fallacies. Dist

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Shaun Ellis
If you read my email, I don't tell anyone what to use, but simply attempt to clear up some fallacies. Distributed version control is new to many, and I want to make sure that folks are getting accurate information from this list. Unfortunately, this statement is not accurate either: // There

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread Devon
If you're not willing to provide even your name to make use of a free service, then I dare say you are erecting your own barriers. Such is your choice, of course, but I don't think others need to be compelled to accommodate the barriers you create for yourself. And just because the terms of use ar

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-21 Thread MJ Ray
Shaun Ellis > * Myth #1 : GitHub creates a barrier to entry. That's a fact, not a myth. Myself, I won't give GitHub my full legal name and I suspect there are others who won't. So, we're not welcome there and if we lie to register, all our work would be subject to deletion at an arbitrary futur

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Erik Hetzner
At Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:50:45 -0800, Tom Johnson wrote: > > > but it would be difficult to replace the social network around the > projects. > > Especially difficult now that GitHub is where the community is. It's > technically possible to build a social web that works on a decentralized > basis,

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Johnston, Leslie
Ah, my bad. > -Original Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of > Karen Coyle > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:15 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry) >

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
Probably a mistake for me to post at all, but I'm full of mistakes. You know what, if someone wants to set up a spot for nerd poetry, I think they should do so. If someone else wants to set up a different spot using different tech, I think they should do so too. I think it's mistaken to think

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Mark A. Matienzo
ther people share, adapt, fork, the poems. > 5. Help the poems persist and record their history as they go. > > Jason > > > From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] on behalf of Tom Johnson > [johnson.tom+code4...@gmail.com]

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Fitchett, Deborah
ODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013 6:07 a.m. To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry) Sure. Although the question was more: how can we make it easy to have a bunch of accounts? Or should we have a c4l

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Tom Johnson
gt; > have $PLANET_NERD_POETS aggregate them. > > > > > > Git and Github are great. But while I get the argument for utility, > there > > > does seem to be barrier-to-entry there for someone just wanting to > > submit a > > > poem. > > > > > > Jason > > >

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Jason Stirnaman
m] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:04 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry) > But while I get the argument for utility, there does seem to be barrier-to-entry there for someone just wanting to submit a poem. The original suggestion was

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Benjamin Armintor
does seem to be barrier-to-entry there for someone just wanting to > submit a > > poem. > > > > Jason > > > > Jason Stirnaman > > Digital Projects Librarian > > A.R. Dykes Library > > University of Kansas Medical Center > > 913-588-7319 &g

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Tom Johnson
__ > From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] on behalf of Karen > Coyle [li...@kcoyle.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:42 AM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry) > > Shaun,

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Erik Hetzner
At Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:20:33 -0500, Shaun Ellis wrote: > > > (As a general rule, for every programmer who prefers tool A, and says > > that everybody should use it, there’s a programmer who disparages tool > > A, and advocates tool B. So take what we say with a grain of salt!) > > It doesn't m

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Jason Stirnaman
...@kcoyle.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:42 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry) Shaun, you cannot decide whether github is a barrier to entry FOR ME (or anyone else), any more than you can decide whether or not my foot hurts. I'm tellin

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Karen Coyle
LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:07 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry) Sure. Although the question was more: how can we make it easy to have a bunch of accounts? Or should we have a c4l accoun

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Johnston, Leslie
2:07 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry) > > Sure. Although the question was more: how can we make it easy to have a > bunch of accounts? Or should we have a c4l account that we share (and > monitor for spam)? I think an

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Stephanie Collett
>* Myth #4 : GitHub is monopolizing open source software development. >> "... to its unfortunate centralizing of so much free/open >> source software on one platform.)" > > Convergence is not always a bad thing. GitHub provides a great, free > service with lots of helpful collaboration tools beyond

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Karen Coyle
Sure. Although the question was more: how can we make it easy to have a bunch of accounts? Or should we have a c4l account that we share (and monitor for spam)? I think anything wysiwyg-y and familiar (wordpress certainly meets those criteria) would be fine. There does seem to be a lot of famil

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > Shaun, you cannot decide whether github is a barrier to entry FOR ME (or > anyone else), any more than you can decide whether or not my foot hurts. I'm > telling you github is NOT what I want to use. Period. While it may be true that you don'

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Ross Singer
On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > Shaun, you cannot decide whether github is a barrier to entry FOR ME (or > anyone else), any more than you can decide whether or not my foot hurts. I'm > telling you github is NOT what I want to use. Period. > > I'm actually thinking that a bl

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Ethan Gruber
Wordpress? On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > Shaun, you cannot decide whether github is a barrier to entry FOR ME (or > anyone else), any more than you can decide whether or not my foot hurts. > I'm telling you github is NOT what I want to use. Period. > > I'm actually thin

Re: [CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Karen Coyle
Shaun, you cannot decide whether github is a barrier to entry FOR ME (or anyone else), any more than you can decide whether or not my foot hurts. I'm telling you github is NOT what I want to use. Period. I'm actually thinking that a blog format would be nice. It could be pretty (poetry and bea

[CODE4LIB] GitHub Myths (was thanks and poetry)

2013-02-20 Thread Shaun Ellis
> (As a general rule, for every programmer who prefers tool A, and says > that everybody should use it, there’s a programmer who disparages tool > A, and advocates tool B. So take what we say with a grain of salt!) It doesn't matter what tools you use, as long as you and your team are able to pa