Quoting Emily Lynema :
Karen,
Is it just Open Library that is excluding serials, or is that the
entire OCA project?
I think the OCA was focused on monographs but did allow in some
serials, possibly because it wasn't clear what they were (as it can be
with bound or reprinted serials). I ha
Karen,
Is it just Open Library that is excluding serials, or is that the entire
OCA project? I'm assuming it's the former; however I think it's the Open
Library work surrounding user access to digitized content that's really
going to make these materials accessible. It seems much more advanced
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, stuart yeates wrote:
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Karen Coyle wrote:
The OL only has full text links, but the link goes to a page at the
Internet Archive that lists all of the available formats. I would prefer
that the link go directly to a display of the book, and offer ot
ch 30, 2010 18:20
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Works API
>
> Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> > Karen Coyle wrote:
> >> The OL only has full text links, but the link goes to a page at the
> >> Internet Archive that lists all of the available
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Karen Coyle wrote:
The OL only has full text links, but the link goes to a page at the
Internet Archive that lists all of the available formats. I would
prefer that the link go directly to a display of the book, and offer
other formats from there (having to click tw
Karen Coyle wrote:
The OL only has full text links, but the link goes to a page at the
Internet Archive that lists all of the available formats. I would
prefer that the link go directly to a display of the book, and offer
other formats from there (having to click twice really turns people
Quoting Peter Noerr :
For our purposes (federated search) it would be most useful to have
as many of the available links (OL or other) as possible, and as
much information about the link as possible. Obvious "structural"
stuff like the type of identifier, but also the nature of the linke
For our purposes (federated search) it would be most useful to have as many of
the available links (OL or other) as possible, and as much information about
the link as possible. Obvious "structural" stuff like the type of identifier,
but also the nature of the linked object (as you suggest "full
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Ed, thanks. I'll need you to be a bit more -v on this one: are you asking
> for a an RDF option on the API, or that Works as a whole be represented as
> linked data? The Open Library doesn't present itself as linked data, as you
> know, and alt
Quoting Ed Summers :
I realize it's of limited utility compared to yet another web2.0 API,
but I think it would be good to see Works represented somehow in the
RDF Linked Data views...assuming they're not already.
//Ed
Ed, thanks. I'll need you to be a bit more -v on this one: are you
asking
I realize it's of limited utility compared to yet another web2.0 API,
but I think it would be good to see Works represented somehow in the
RDF Linked Data views...assuming they're not already.
//Ed
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Open Library now has Works defined, and is lo
11 matches
Mail list logo
