Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Thanks for the clarification! Rui On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:56:37AM -0400, Brad Lassey wrote: > Yes, I suppose that would be a bit of a misprint, which I have corrected > to read "If you want to cross-compile Fennec and XULRunner for Maemo, > you should first set up scratchbox >

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Xavier Cremaschi wrote: > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra a écrit : >> Does it have a sane compile process already? Or is it still the hell on >> drugs that I last saw (which was fairly recent)? > > I tried for alpha 1 and alpha 2 too, and I failed. > But IIRC Marco Trevisan succeeded (for alpha 1) a long

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Brad Lassey wrote: > On 3/21/2009 2:54 PM, GNUtoo wrote: >> I built it too... >> but it has issues: >> *slow >> > There have been a lot of performance improvements in beta 1 (with more > coming before release). If its slow on FR, it would be great to get > some profiles so we can know where

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

On 3/21/2009 2:54 PM, GNUtoo wrote: > I built it too... > but it has issues: > *slow > There have been a lot of performance improvements in beta 1 (with more coming before release). If its slow on FR, it would be great to get some profiles so we can know where the hot spots are. > *not obti

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:32 -0400, Brad Lassey wrote: > Al, > > Personally, I have never used bitbake, so I'm not sure what that is > doing exactly. > > As for the autoconf question, mozilla requires autoconf2.13. You can > specify the path to your autoconf2.13 either by exporting > AUTOCONF=

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 17:55 +0100, Johny Tenfinger wrote: > I builded Alpha 2 with bitbake some time ago. It has bugs with using > autotools from host machine, but i workarounded it and it worked. Now > i'm trying the same with beta 1. but alpha 2 was really slow... I'm > not expecting Beta 1 to be

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

I builded Alpha 2 with bitbake some time ago. It has bugs with using autotools from host machine, but i workarounded it and it worked. Now i'm trying the same with beta 1. but alpha 2 was really slow... I'm not expecting Beta 1 to be usable on FR. ___ Op

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Al, Personally, I have never used bitbake, so I'm not sure what that is doing exactly. As for the autoconf question, mozilla requires autoconf2.13. You can specify the path to your autoconf2.13 either by exporting AUTOCONF= in your environment or by specifying AUTOCONF= in your mozconfig. S

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

On Friday 20 March 2009, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > You're oversimplifying a bit. > > You're forgetting https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/cs2007q3 I just tried: bitbake fennec This does a checkout from hg but it fails during configure. It looks like it's trying to use autoconf2.13 for

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Yes, I suppose that would be a bit of a misprint, which I have corrected to read "If you want to cross-compile Fennec and XULRunner for Maemo, you should first set up scratchbox ." The mozilla build process handles gcc style cross compiles out of

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Now I know nothing about anything, and I've only just read this part of the thread - but could it not be that the cross compiler and tools setup by MokoMakefile are used instead when building for the NEO? - Gunnar Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > Really? > > Because it says "If you want to cross

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Really? Because it says "If you want to cross-compile Fennec and XULRunner for ARM devices, you should first set up scratchbox." r...@om-gta02:~# grep Processor /proc/cpuinfo Processor : ARM920T rev 0 (v4l) Rui On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:29:11AM -0400, Brad Lassey wrote: > Rui, > > Thos

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

To incentive a little more the awesome work you are doing porting Fennec, there is a cofundos.org bounty for this once a opkg package is reached http://openmoko.cofundos.org/project.php?id=156 2009/3/20 Brad Lassey : > Rui, > > Those instructions are for setting up a Maemo development environment,

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Rui, Those instructions are for setting up a Maemo development environment, which wouldn't be applicable to someone trying to build for Openmoko. -Brad On 3/20/2009 4:50 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > You're oversimplifying a bit. > > You're forgetting https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Bui

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

You're oversimplifying a bit. You're forgetting https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/cs2007q3 Rui On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:05:45AM -0700, blassey wrote: > > Out of curiosity, what part of the build process is giving you trouble? It > boils down to this: > > -Pull the code >hg clone htt

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

copy and paste) -Build make -f client.mk build Daniel Benoy wrote: > > Looks like the hell on drugs according to their wiki. > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/Fennec > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Fennec-Beta-1-Released-tp2499202

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:00:15PM +0100, Xavier Cremaschi wrote: > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra a écrit : > > Does it have a sane compile process already? Or is it still the hell on > > drugs that I last saw (which was fairly recent)? > > I tried for alpha 1 and alpha 2 too, and I failed. > But IIRC M

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Rui Miguel Silva Seabra a écrit : > Does it have a sane compile process already? Or is it still the hell on > drugs that I last saw (which was fairly recent)? I tried for alpha 1 and alpha 2 too, and I failed. But IIRC Marco Trevisan succeeded (for alpha 1) a long time ago... Marco if you read th

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

> Looks like the hell on drugs according to their wiki. what do you expect from people who put most of their browser's configuration in a long list of key/value pairs, accessible only via about:config -- the keys often unreadble and the values even more? for every advanced setting you have to

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

Looks like the hell on drugs according to their wiki. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Build/Fennec On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:36:04 you wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:27:58AM -0800, Ben Hussey wrote: > > I can't wait to see how this is on the Freerunner. I tried a version > > some month

Re: Fennec Beta 1 Released

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:27:58AM -0800, Ben Hussey wrote: > I can't wait to see how this is on the Freerunner. I tried a version > some months ago, but it was to slow to be worthwhile. It sounds like > there are a lot of speedups in this version. > > http://blog.pavlov.net/2009/03/17/fennec-

Fennec Beta 1 Released

I can't wait to see how this is on the Freerunner. I tried a version some months ago, but it was to slow to be worthwhile. It sounds like there are a lot of speedups in this version. http://blog.pavlov.net/2009/03/17/fennec-1-beta-1/ http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fennec/1.0b1/releasenotes/