> Maybe when I get time I'll take a freerunner up to my friends at Emu
> and see
> what ideas they come up with.
Do it! See if they'll port a few of their apps to it for us .. ;)
;
--
Jay Vaughan
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@li
AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Inter-Freerunner Connectivity
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> Sounds cool. Something completely new or something based on csound,
>> supercollider or similar?
>
>
> Something new, but supercollider and puredata on the Freerunn
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Tilman Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jay Vaughan wrote:
> >> Sounds cool. Something completely new or something based on csound,
> >> supercollider or similar?
> >
> >
> > Something new, but supercollider and puredata on the Freerunner will
> > work, I imag
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> Sounds cool. Something completely new or something based on csound,
>> supercollider or similar?
>
>
> Something new, but supercollider and puredata on the Freerunner will
> work, I imagine, quite well. Pair it up with some nice MIDI
> controller and a custom cable, and
Monday 30 June 2008 Jay Vaughan wrote:
> > i just attended a convention where one of the events was an
> > experimental
> > music set by one of the attendees using a Tenori-On (and jamming
> > with another
> > attendee on a digeridoo[1]),
>
> Yes, the tenori-on is definitely do-able with the OM ph
> Sounds cool. Something completely new or something based on csound,
> supercollider or similar?
Something new, but supercollider and puredata on the Freerunner will
work, I imagine, quite well. Pair it up with some nice MIDI
controller and a custom cable, and you've got a synth/music-makin
> i just attended a convention where one of the events was an
> experimental
> music set by one of the attendees using a Tenori-On (and jamming
> with another
> attendee on a digeridoo[1]),
Yes, the tenori-on is definitely do-able with the OM phone .. I used
to work for a major synth mfr, s
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>>> And just for fun... Would there be any practical purpose for
>>> communicating through the headphone/mic jack?
>> No.
>>
>
>
>
>
> AUDIO Routing! Yes! There are practical purposes: multiple
> freerunners being used to create a symphony of soft-synths, with an
> au
> What's wrong with "plain old" bluetooth?
most devices concerned do not have bt: tv, hifi, vcr, dvd player ...
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Charles Pax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sounds interesting. Will you be doing this through cables or IR with a
> device similar to the one featured at
> http://features.engadget.com/2004/07/27/how-to-turn-your-ipod-in-to-a-universal-infrared-remote-control/
What
Monday 30 June 2008 Jay Vaughan wrote:
> > Would you explain this a little more, I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> I am developing a soft-synth for OpenMoko, and I believe others are
> too. We would like to jam together, but don't have a mixer. So we
> route the audio of one phone to the other, and
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> Would you explain this a little more, I'm not sure what you mean.
>
>
> I am developing a soft-synth for OpenMoko, and I believe others are
> too. We would like to jam together, but don't have a mixer. So we
> route the audio of one phone to the other, and do 'soft mix
> Sounds interesting. Will you be doing this through cables or IR with
> a device similar to the one
Cables, of course .. or gadget-audio if possible ..
;
--
Jay Vaughan
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://li
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Jay Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am developing a soft-synth for OpenMoko, and I believe others are
> too. We would like to jam together, but don't have a mixer. So we
> route the audio of one phone to the other, and do 'soft mixing' on the
> master phon
> Would you explain this a little more, I'm not sure what you mean.
I am developing a soft-synth for OpenMoko, and I believe others are
too. We would like to jam together, but don't have a mixer. So we
route the audio of one phone to the other, and do 'soft mixing' on the
master phone ..
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Jay Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> And just for fun... Would there be any practical purpose for
> >> communicating through the headphone/mic jack?
>
> AUDIO Routing! Yes! There are practical purposes: multiple
> freerunners being used to create a symphon
>>
>> And just for fun... Would there be any practical purpose for
>> communicating through the headphone/mic jack?
>
> No.
>
AUDIO Routing! Yes! There are practical purposes: multiple
freerunners being used to create a symphony of soft-synths, with an
audio routing network between them t
"Francesco Cat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Making the FR a walkie-talkie device was in some kind of wishlist I
> think :)
We need GNU Radio on it;).
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23cont
2008/6/29 Charles Pax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In what ways can two Freerunners plausibly communicate? Which is the fastest
> for data transfer?
Wifi and bluetooth for sure
> Can they connect via WiFi without a separate router? I've seen some
> discussion over how the Freerunner cannot be used as an
su, 2008-06-29 kello 13:22 -0400, Charles Pax kirjoitti:
> In what ways can two Freerunners plausibly communicate? Which is the
> fastest for data transfer?
Wifi.
> Can they connect via WiFi without a separate router? I've seen some
> discussion over how the Freerunner cannot be used as an access
20 matches
Mail list logo
