Am Monday 13 October 2008 02:14:06 schrieb nickd:
> Bummer. Upon further reading I see the difference in flash devices now.
> Do you think UBIFS could replace JFFS on the Freerunner? Is there a
> benefit? Or is there not enough wiggle room on the FR for caching? It
> seems better overall [1]. Would
Bummer. Upon further reading I see the difference in flash devices now.
Do you think UBIFS could replace JFFS on the Freerunner? Is there a
benefit? Or is there not enough wiggle room on the FR for caching? It
seems better overall [1]. Would it be possible to replace it yourself
with the approp
nickd wrote:
> I haven't sorry. Coincidentaly, the new kernel which was released the
> other day (.27) includes a new filesystem designed for flash drives -
> UBIFS [1]. I wonder if this could be relevant to this project. It looks
> like it has full write-back support, meaning it doesn't need to
I haven't sorry. Coincidentaly, the new kernel which was released the
other day (.27) includes a new filesystem designed for flash drives -
UBIFS [1]. I wonder if this could be relevant to this project. It looks
like it has full write-back support, meaning it doesn't need to write to
the SD car
4 matches
Mail list logo