, Karl Wright wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 to both.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack Krupan
gt;>>>> On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to both.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack Kru
...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to both - review of name and address the NTLM issue since ACF is
>>>> getting
>>>>>> closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
>>>>>>
>>>&
p 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack Krupansky <
>>>> jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 to both - review of name and address the NTLM issue since ACF is
>>> getting
>>>>> closer to where an actual 0.1 relea
gt;
>>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
>>>> To:
>>>> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VO
>> ----------
> >> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
> >> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
> >> To:
> >> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name
> >>
> >>
> >> ACF pas
gt; closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --
>> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re:
Also, do we need to get approval to get "resources" allocated to start a
nightly build?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Grant Ingersoll"
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 8:43 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your p
NTLM issue since ACF is getting
>> closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --
>> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35
-- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name
>
>
> ACF passed the Incubator vote.
>>
>> My question to the comm
ubject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name
ACF passed the Incubator vote.
My question to the community is do you want me to go to the Board and ask
for advice on this since the Board ultimately approves any podling
graduating? One Director weighed in on the vote saying the Board wouldn'
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
> ACF passed the Incubator vote.
>
> My question to the community is do you want me to go to the Board and ask for
> advice on this since the Board ultimately approves any podling graduating?
> One Director weighed in on the vote saying th
ACF passed the Incubator vote.
My question to the community is do you want me to go to the Board and ask for
advice on this since the Board ultimately approves any podling graduating? One
Director weighed in on the vote saying the Board wouldn't care, but in my view
it was not an official opin
OK, I'll follow up on gene...@incubator.a.o.
On Sep 7, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Voting is now closed.
>
> Final tally (which only counts Robert's first choice and not all three):
>
> Apache Connectors Framework 15
> Apache Manifold 11
> Apache Yukon 9
> Apache Macon 4
> Apache Man
Voting is now closed.
Final tally (which only counts Robert's first choice and not all three):
Apache Connectors Framework 15
Apache Manifold 11
Apache Yukon 9
Apache Macon 4
Apache ManifoldCF 3
Apache Omni 1
Apache Acromantula 1
Apache Lukon 1
Karl
ote Manifold x 3, but I'll keep my vote as is.
>>
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> ------
>> From: "Karl Wright"
>> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 8:21 AM
>>
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pick your preferred name
for sure yet.
>>>
>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>
>>> --
>>> From: "Karl Wright"
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:02 AM
>>> To:
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pick your prefer
02, 2010 8:21 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pick your preferred name
You have until 5 PM Friday to tally your final vote.
Bear in mind, however, that changing your vote to achieve a desired
outcome
may well cause others to change their votes to counteract your move. So I
urge people to change your v
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I'm not sure Robert's strategy should be legal. It never honestly occurred
> to me that anyone would try to do that. For that reason, I am toying with
> the idea of just counting his first (highest) vote, which right now would
> still yield t
I'm not sure Robert's strategy should be legal. It never honestly occurred
to me that anyone would try to do that. For that reason, I am toying with
the idea of just counting his first (highest) vote, which right now would
still yield the same result. I think that meets everyone's expectations
a
and what subdomain name
will be used for the project once it graduates from incubation. I checked
and the actual usage is mixed; sometimes the words are catenated and
sometimes an acronym is used, but not with a leading "a".
-- Jack Krupansky
-------
On 9/2/10 8:21 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> You have until 5 PM Friday to tally your final vote.
>
> Bear in mind, however, that changing your vote to achieve a desired outcome
> may well cause others to change their votes to counteract your move. So I
> urge people to change your vote ONLY if you wa
is the leading one so far. I haven't decided for sure yet.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From: "Karl Wright"
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:02 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pick your preferred name
From: "Karl Wright"
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:02 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pick your preferred name
A late entry has been added: Apache Datasource Connectors.
If you would like to change your vote to include this option, please
revote,
and I will adjust accordingly.
On W
A late entry has been added: Apache Datasource Connectors.
If you would like to change your vote to include this option, please revote,
and I will adjust accordingly.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Rounding the first bend, the horses are neck-and-neck, and the scores are
Rounding the first bend, the horses are neck-and-neck, and the scores are as
follows:
Apache Connectors Framework 18
Apache Manifold 11
Apache Yukon 9
Apache Macon 4
Apache ManifoldCF 3
Apache Omni 1
Apache Acromantula 1
Apache Lukon 1
To obtain these, I gave 3 points to someone's first choice,
Sorry. I stand corrected, and the vote will remain open until Friday
evening.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> FYI, votes are always open for 3 days.
>
> Here's mine:
>
> Apache ManifoldCF
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Manifold
>
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 8:39 A
FYI, votes are always open for 3 days.
Here's mine:
Apache ManifoldCF
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Manifold
On Sep 1, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> FWIW, I am hoping to close the vote and tally the results after 5 PM EDT
> today. So vote early, and vote often! ;-)
>
> Karl
>
FWIW, I am hoping to close the vote and tally the results after 5 PM EDT
today. So vote early, and vote often! ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list
> with a selection, in order, of the top three n
Apache Yukon
Apache Macon
Apache Manifold
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Apache Manifold
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Omni
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> > I think this vote will conclusively demonstr
Apache Manifold
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Omni
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I think this vote will conclusively demonstrate the community position to
> the solons at incubator. They can choose to ignore the vote, of course, but
> they won't be able to say we didn
I think this vote will conclusively demonstrate the community position to
the solons at incubator. They can choose to ignore the vote, of course, but
they won't be able to say we didn't consider alternatives. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I think its pretty cle
I think its pretty clear that unless the lords of the incubator *force*
us to do otherwise, we should just leave it as Apache Connectors
Framework. The vote is going to end up reflecting that is my bet anyway.
I havn't seen anyone that's actually involved (if you can say anyone
beyond karl is reall
you can ignore my vote really :)
but i was thinking from a practical perspective, this one involves the least
code changes.
plus, with existing projects named things like "apache DB" and "apache http
server", i don't understand the fuss.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> We
Well, you've made your feelings clear. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Connectors Framework
>
> (sorry)
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> > I know this is un-Apache-like,
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Connectors Framework
(sorry)
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list
> with
> a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project curren
On 8/31/10 7:09 PM, Matt Weber wrote:
> Don't know if this is an open vote... but if it is:
>
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Yukon
> Apache Manifold
>
>
The more input the merrier!
Don't know if this is an open vote... but if it is:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Yukon
Apache Manifold
--
Thanks,
Matt Weber
3:58 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Apache Manifold
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Yukon
>
> - mark
>
> On 8/31/10 6:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> My preference
Apache Manifold
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Yukon
- mark
On 8/31/10 6:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> My preferences:
>
> Apache Connectors Framework
> Apache Manifold
> Apache Acromantula
>
> Karl
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> I know this is un-Apache-like,
My preferences:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Manifold
Apache Acromantula
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list
> with a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project currently
> kno
1. Apache Yukon
2. Apache Macon
3. Apache Lukon
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Karl Wright"
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:44 PM
To: "connectors-dev"
Subject: [VOTE] Pick your preferred name
I know this is un-Apache-like, b
I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list with
a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project currently
known as Apache Connectors Framework. The choices
are:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Acromantula
Apache Manifold
Apache ManifoldCF
Apache Multi
42 matches
Mail list logo
