tp://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8207744/webrev.04/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
> On Aug 10, 2018, at 6:20 AM, B. Blaser wrote:
>
> Among the files you suggest to fix, only the following ones are still
> using 'readdir64' for other systems than AIX:
>
>
Hi Brian,
Among the files you suggest to fix, only the following ones are still
using 'readdir64' for other systems than AIX:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8207744/webrev.03/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/UnixFileSystem_md.c.frames.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8207744/webrev.03/src/j
think you are correct. Webrev updated accordingly:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8207744/webrev.01/
>
> I know you cannot do it, but a build of this on AIX by someone would be
> appreciated (not urgent).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
> On Jul 27, 2018, at 7:16 A
Hi Brian,
On 26 July 2018 at 22:13, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207744
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8207744/webrev.00/
>
> This change simply adds
>
> #if defined(_AIX)
> #define DIR DIR64
> #define opendir opendir64
> #define closedir closedir64
On 17 July 2018 at 19:13, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2018, at 9:05 AM, B. Blaser wrote:
>
> On 17 July 2018 at 09:46, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> For serviceability-dev but I assume OperatingSystemImpl.c should move to
> readdir64 to be consistent with the other
On 17 July 2018 at 09:46, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 17/07/2018 04:57, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202794
>>
>> Continues thread [1] with subject line updated to match the issue summary.
>> Part of this general problem was addressed in [2].
>>
>> The patch
Hi Alan,
On 28 June 2018 at 13:49, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 20/06/2018 11:08, Pengfei Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have tried the patch (
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052991.html )
>> on Ubuntu 18.04 machines (x86_64 & aarch64) with glibc=2.26.1 and build is
>> O
Hi Pengfei,
On 20 June 2018 at 12:08, Pengfei Li wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have tried the patch (
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052991.html )
> on Ubuntu 18.04 machines (x86_64 & aarch64) with glibc=2.26.1 and build is OK.
>
> There's a small issue within the following
On 7 May 2018 at 14:19, B. Blaser wrote:
> On 6 May 2018 at 18:35, B. Blaser wrote:
>> On 5 May 2018 at 22:26, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>>> On May 5, 2018, at 8:03 AM, B. Blaser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4 May 2018 at 17:42, Alan Bateman wrot
On 6 May 2018 at 18:35, B. Blaser wrote:
> On 5 May 2018 at 22:26, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> On May 5, 2018, at 8:03 AM, B. Blaser wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4 May 2018 at 17:42, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>> On 04/05/2018 16:31, B. Blaser wrote:
>>>>>
On 5 May 2018 at 22:26, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On May 5, 2018, at 8:03 AM, B. Blaser wrote:
>>
>> On 4 May 2018 at 17:42, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2018 16:31, B. Blaser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> I'll cre
On 4 May 2018 at 17:42, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 16:31, B. Blaser wrote:
>>
>> :
>>
>> I'll create a new JBS issue (unless you want to) since the fix is
>> mostly located in core-libs and only intended to make the build
>> complete.
>>
On 3 May 2018 at 21:43, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On May 3, 2018, at 1:52 PM, B. Blaser wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2 May 2018 at 22:40, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>>> On May 2, 2018, at 5:10 AM, Michal Vala wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Hi,
On 2 May 2018 at 22:40, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On May 2, 2018, at 5:10 AM, Michal Vala wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/01/2018 07:59 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
On Apr 27, 2018, at 4:26 PM, Michal Vala wrote:
Someone to sponsor this please?
>>> Do you have a sponsor yet? If not, I’ll do it.
>
14 matches
Mail list logo