Re: Schneier: Why Digital Signatures are not Signatures (was Re: CRYPTO-GRAM, November 15, 2000)

2000-11-19 Thread Dan Geer
> As the US banking system (and especially the bank clearinghouses controlled > by the Federal Reserve system) has gone electronic, all the banks I know of > have stopped bothering to verify the signatures on checks, and similarly > those on credit- and debit-card drafts. Getting them to st

Re: Schneier: Why Digital Signatures are not Signatures (was Re: CRYPTO-GRAM, November 15, 2000)

2000-11-18 Thread Bram Cohen
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, John David Galt wrote: > As the US banking system (and especially the bank clearinghouses controlled > by the Federal Reserve system) has gone electronic, all the banks I know of > have stopped bothering to verify the signatures on checks, and similarly > those on credit- and

Re: Schneier: Why Digital Signatures are not Signatures (was Re: CRYPTO-GRAM, November 15, 2000)

2000-11-17 Thread John David Galt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The insecurity of digital signatures pales when we realize how little > security there is in the rest of the world. Handwritten and electronic > signatures are no more secure than digital ones. Either would be better than nothing. As the US banking system (and especi