I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
pHi there span class=boldbolded text/span/p
pstrongI'm bold/strong/p
The strong tag above was rendering wrong in FF and Chrome. FF was
'double-bolding' the
Hi Tom,
font-weight:500 means semi-bold, default for strong is bold, so I gess
you need to add that extra rule
strong {
font-weight: 500;
}
you can take a look at:
http://elliotjaystocks.com/blog/font-weight-in-the-age-of-web-fonts/
and
http://css-tricks.com/watch-your-font-weight/
hope it
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Isabel Santos unboun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
font-weight:500 means semi-bold, default for strong is bold, so I gess
you need to add that extra rule
strong {
font-weight: 500;
}
you can take a look at:
Thanks Isabel. All i can say is I'm glad it isn't a case of me just being
tick-headed. It's not just me.
Er, I mean thick-headed.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Tom,
You're not using the strong tag for styling are you?
On March 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
pHi there span
2014-03-27 18:34, Tom Livingston wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
I suppose you are using some special tools that convert that $roboto to
a real name. But how do you refer to the
Eric wrote:
You're not using the strong tag for styling are you?
I very much suspect that the browser neither knows nor cares
why any particular tag has been used, Eric; it almost certainly
renders the tagged element identically, regardless of the
motivation for the tag's use.
Philip
On 3/27/14, 9:34 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
pHi there span class=boldbolded text/span/p
pstrongI'm bold/strong/p
The strong tag above was rendering wrong in
Yes, I realize that. I was just checking to see if a different CSS approach
might be used.
On March 27, 2014 at 2:53 PM Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Eric wrote:
You're not using the strong tag for styling are you?
I very much suspect that the browser neither knows nor cares
This (small font families...few included weights) and the fact that the bulk of
the Yahoo Fonts are not the highest quality is the reason I moved to Typekit.
Personally I'll do anything to avoid a UA's faux bold and italic rendering.
If you need to use Google Fonts there are a couple of good
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Eric e...@minerbits.com wrote:
Yes, I realize that. I was just checking to see if a different CSS approach
might be used.
On March 27, 2014 at 2:53 PM Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Eric wrote:
You're not using the strong tag for
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fiwrote:
2014-03-27 18:34, Tom Livingston wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
I suppose you are using some
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
pHi there span class=boldbolded text/span/p
pstrongI'm bold/strong/p
The
13 matches
Mail list logo