RE: Extending long threads

2004-07-11 Thread GARY VANSICKLE
> GARY VANSICKLE wrote: >> There's three reasons people knee-jerk against HTML email: >> >> 1. It isn't ASCII (i.e. the "Back in my day a child would open up a >> gift and within seconds he'd either burst into flames or lose a limb! >> That's the way it was and we liked it!"[1] Defense). >> 2a.

Re: Extending long threads

2004-07-10 Thread Rolf Campbell
GARY VANSICKLE wrote: There's three reasons people knee-jerk against HTML email: 1. It isn't ASCII (i.e. the "Back in my day a child would open up a gift and within seconds he'd either burst into flames or lose a limb! That's the way it was and we liked it!"[1] Defense). 2a. There isn't an email

Re: Extending long threads

2004-07-09 Thread Andrew DeFaria
GARY VANSICKLE wrote: As a person who regularly uses HTML style email and posting (much to many peoples chargrin and complaints) I rarely "fester" them with "all" sorts of colors and fonts. Other HTML emails and posts I receive are also rarely "festered" with all sorts of colors and fonts. Why?

RE: Extending long threads (was: RE: Wrapping long lines (Was Re: FAQ update suggestion for "I'm having basic problems with find. Why?"))

2004-07-09 Thread GARY VANSICKLE
> As a person who regularly uses HTML style email and posting > (much to many peoples chargrin and complaints) I rarely > "fester" them with "all" > sorts of colors and fonts. Other HTML emails and posts I > receive are also rarely "festered" with all sorts of colors > and fonts. Why? Because