On 2013-06-18 17:32, JonY wrote:
On 6/19/2013 06:17, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
As for the logistics, how about you put this in a temporary location
(not under release) that I can access, and then I can deal with all the
necessary transitioning.
Where do I put the files at? /sourceware/cygwin-gc
On 2013-06-13 19:42, Florent Monnier wrote:
If I'm not mistaken cygwin also provides some libs for mingw's toolchain.
Any chance to get a mingw compiled ocaml in cygwin?
Perhaps OT, but that is NOT as easy as it sounds.
Yaakov
On 2013-06-16 06:38, Ken Brown wrote:
On 6/15/2013 8:37 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
It's easy enough to provide bundle packages and the normal user would
never need to look at the individual distribution packages.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see the need for bundle
packages. Take the
On 2013-06-15 07:37, Achim Gratz wrote:
Reini Urban writes:
If you really want to maintain 2000+ packages do it. I don't care.
Nobody suggested that all of a sudden Cygwin should come with all CPAN
distributions pre-bundled. My current guess, based on my own usage,
would be on the order of 30
On 6/19/2013 06:17, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>
> As for the logistics, how about you put this in a temporary location
> (not under release) that I can access, and then I can deal with all the
> necessary transitioning.
>
Where do I put the files at? /sourceware/cygwin-gcc/ sounds OK?
signatu
On 2013-06-17 17:21, JonY wrote:
For the record, here are the deps stated by cygport:
gcc requires: gcc-core gcc-g++
gcc-core requires: bash libcloog0 libgcc1 libgmp3 libgomp1 libiconv2 libintl8
libmpc3 libmpfr4 libppl_c4 libquadmath0 libssp0 zlib0 binutils w32api-headers
w32api-runtime
gcc-
Hi
New 64bit versions of
'openldap/openldap-server/libopenldap2_4_2/openldap-devel' have been uploaded
to a server near you.
openldap NEWS:
===
o Build for cygwin 1.7.21-4 with gcc-4.8.1-1
o The following tests (out of 64) are hanging:
test008-concurrency
test033-glue-s
On Jun 18 21:51, JonY wrote:
> On 6/18/2013 19:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > Whom are you asking? Not me, I hope. If so, whatever you guys think is
> > right, is right, as long as gcc just works and the Cygwin DLL builds.
> > As a sidepoint, you won't get as much testing as you like as lon
JonY writes:
> All the new ppl/mpc/mpfr/gmp that were marked experimental needs to be
> switched to stable at the same time gcc-4.7.x or else gcc would be
> broken for awhile without those DLLs.
When do you plan to roll a new gcc package? I would want to re-compile
these with 4.7.3 just to be sur
On 6/18/2013 19:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> Whom are you asking? Not me, I hope. If so, whatever you guys think is
> right, is right, as long as gcc just works and the Cygwin DLL builds.
> As a sidepoint, you won't get as much testing as you like as long as the
> stuff is in "test". Most pe
On Jun 18 18:38, JonY wrote:
> On 6/18/2013 06:21, JonY wrote:
> >>
> >> Sounds doable? Alternatively, the current experimental gcc 4.7.2 and its
> >> dep be made stable before 4.7.3 is pushed, after all, I did use 4.7.2 to
> >> build the new gcc, it is stable enough.
> >>
> >
> > Doable?
> >
>
On 6/18/2013 06:21, JonY wrote:
>>
>> Sounds doable? Alternatively, the current experimental gcc 4.7.2 and its
>> dep be made stable before 4.7.3 is pushed, after all, I did use 4.7.2 to
>> build the new gcc, it is stable enough.
>>
>
> Doable?
>
Hey, can you guys decide? I'll be off in a few da
On 18 June 2013 04:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 17 12:53, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> Please upload:
>>
>> ---
>> http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5530441/cygwin/hexedit/hexedit-debuginfo/hexedit-debuginfo-1.60.1-1.tar.bz2
>
> Wow, that was weird, until I realized that 1.60.1-1 couldn't be
On Jun 17 12:53, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> Please upload:
>
> ---
> wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=3 \
> http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5530441/cygwin/hexedit/setup.hint \
> http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5530441/cygwin/hexedit/hexedit-1.2.13-1.tar.bz2
> \
> http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/55304
14 matches
Mail list logo
