Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 23:07, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> To Brian: cygwin-apps is the preferred place to discuss setup
development.
>> Transferring this thread there.
>>
>> To cygwin-apps: Here is a patch from Brian Keener which got forgotten.
>> It adds 2 additional views, Only K
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 23:07, Max Bowsher wrote:
> To Brian: cygwin-apps is the preferred place to discuss setup development.
> Transferring this thread there.
>
> To cygwin-apps: Here is a patch from Brian Keener which got forgotten.
> It adds 2 additional views, Only Keeps and Only Skips. I think
To Brian: cygwin-apps is the preferred place to discuss setup development.
Transferring this thread there.
To cygwin-apps: Here is a patch from Brian Keener which got forgotten.
It adds 2 additional views, Only Keeps and Only Skips. I think this could be
valuable, and these very features are in th
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 19:03, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Recently I've been thinking "tab control". Well, actually I was thinking that
> for the view type. Then again, I just now thought of the best idea yet:
> drop-down list boxes for both.
Let me say this:
Anything that is more intuitive wi
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Kris Thielemans wrote:
[snip]
> I have a different opinion. First, note that the radio buttons don't act
> like radio buttons at all. When you click them, they alter the state of
> all the packages spin controls to meet the criteria of that button. I.e.
> they really should
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Kris Thielemans wrote:
KT> just a final thought on the 'keep' sutff (maybe you've gone ahead and coded
KT> it already, so then you forget about this). This is on the question to put
KT> 'keep' in the spin control or a radio button. we had
I coded it and sent a patch to this li
Hi Max,
just a final thought on the 'keep' sutff (maybe you've gone ahead and coded
it already, so then you forget about this). This is on the question to put
'keep' in the spin control or a radio button. we had
kris> so maybe it makes more sense to add a 'keep' to this sequence, than
kris> to ad
> It's already a lot of clicking. Which is why I advocate a radio button.
>
but you can't have a radiobutton for every category...
Kris Thielemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't like it. Setup's clicky spin control things are not the
>> easiest thing to use. I would much prefer a radio button.
>>
>
> well, obviously I thought so as well, as I didn't even see the 'spin
> control'. but now that I know they're there, I
>
> I don't like it. Setup's clicky spin control things are not the easiest
> thing to use. I would much prefer a radio button.
>
well, obviously I thought so as well, as I didn't even see the 'spin
control'. but now that I know they're there, I like them.
> I agree that the functionality of th
Kris Thielemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks,
> so maybe it makes more sense to add a 'keep' to this sequence, than
> to add a 'keep' radio button. Then there's a nice distinction:
> - radio buttons signify 'trust level'
> - default et al signify what you want to do.
>
> much better I think
>
> Ah yes.
> Default =
> If the package is installed, upgrade to the selected trust level (prev,
> current or experimental).
> If the package is not installed, but is in base or misc, install the
> select trust level's version of that package.
>
> Install =
> Install the selected trust level's ve
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 02:15, Kris Thielemans wrote:
>
> > >
> > > - what's the difference between 'default' and 'install'?
> > >
>
> ok, now I know there's no a difference for Base and Misc, but I still don't
> know what the difference is for the others ...
> (I guess I'm missing something obviou
Kris Thielemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> - what's the difference between 'default' and 'install'?
>>>
>
> ok, now I know there's no a difference for Base and Misc, but I still
> don't know what the difference is for the others ...
> (I guess I'm missing something obvious here)
Yep. Default
> >
> > - what's the difference between 'default' and 'install'?
> >
ok, now I know there's no a difference for Base and Misc, but I still don't
know what the difference is for the others ...
(I guess I'm missing something obvious here)
> > - it should be very easy to add 'remove' as well. This
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 21:39, Kris Thielemans wrote:
> - it's not an incredible piece of user friendly design. I didn't have a clue
> you could click there and what the effect would be. Don't get me wrong,
> being able to do global stuff per category *is* a very nice feature. So,
> maybe some onlin
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 00:20, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > - what's the difference between 'default' and 'install'?
>
> default == install only for the 'Base' category.
Or the Misc category (local packages not listed in a .ini file go into
Misc).
> > - it should be very easy to add 'remove' as well. T
>> It's already in place. Just click 'default' beside 'all' twice and
>> you should get 'keep'.
Kris Thielemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comments about that:
>
> - the setup version that is currently on the cygwin home page does
> not have this feature: it cycles between default, install, rei
> >
> > I'm not promising anything, but there's a slim chance I'll have a patch
> > ready in time for upcoming setup release at the weekend / early
> next week.
>
> It's already in place. Just click 'default' beside 'all' twice and you
> should get 'keep'.
>
comments about that:
- the setup vers
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 06:54, Max Bowsher wrote:
> From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > It's already in place. Just click 'default' beside 'all' twice and you
> > should get 'keep'.
>
> Default -> Install -> Reinstall -> Uninstall -> Default
Ah. Well seems to me this is the appropriate p
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's already in place. Just click 'default' beside 'all' twice and you
> should get 'keep'.
Default -> Install -> Reinstall -> Uninstall -> Default
Nope.
Max.
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 01:49, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Comments?
>
> I'm not promising anything, but there's a slim chance I'll have a patch
> ready in time for upcoming setup release at the weekend / early next week.
It's already in place. Just click 'default' beside 'all' twice and you
should get
> Setup design discussion happens on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This thread is moving there.
>
sorry.
>
> > Will it be implemented? (I hope so, and the implementer can get a
> > really nice email from me).
>
> I volunteer.
fantastic!
> But I suggest we remove the prev radio button -
definitely. it
Setup design discussion happens on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This thread is moving there.
Everybody, please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your replies.
Kris Thielemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to have an additional radio-
24 matches
Mail list logo
