On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 11:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HavenCo's error was not initially raising the necessary cash to buy
Sealand
outright from the Bates, or if that didn't work they could have done
it the old
fashioned way by marrying into the family. Not having total control
led
I ran across a reference to this company, which says it has raised $20
M in VC financing and which claims it has a system which implements the
digital equivalent of "disappearing ink."
(Perhaps distilled from snake oil?)
The URL is still called disappearing.com, but the company is now called
O
At 06:52 PM 08/05/2003 -0700, Tim May wrote:
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 01:00 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
It's nice to see that they're still around, unlike so many dot.bombs.
Why is it "nice"?
They had what looked like a legitimate security / privacy product,
and were upfront about the threat m
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * John Kozubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-02 19:27]:
> >
> > That is incorrect. AOL owns their network, and they can respond to your
> > arbitrary communications on their network in any way they see fit.
>
> Unfortunately, you're correct.
>
> > Mayb
Mac Norton wrote:
>There was a weapons charge as well, which will always complicate
>matters considerably.
There was a weapons charge -- Molotov cocktail -- in the first indictment
which was dropped.
The second indictment was for the single charge of distribution of
information, to wit:
1
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...] I'm
> talking about is AOL committing a DoS attack on me, which is
> actionable regardless of Bob's contract.
Dear honorable Mr. Mindfuq,
I am from this point forward blocking all mail traffic from you to the
networks I control. None of your
In a message dated 8/5/2003 2:51:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Sterling had placed much too much emphasis on the havens' attempt to be
physically secure by owning small countries and not nearly enough (if any) emphasis
on using strong cryptography to achieve security ins
Bob - Perry's cryptography list moved from wasabisystems to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a few months ago. [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
-
lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] serves the following lists:
bsd-api-announceThe BSD APIs Announcement Mailing
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 10:59 AM, Tyler Durden wrote:
Tim May wrote...
"Where did this "of color" nonsense get started?"
Like a lot of PC terms...from guilt-ridden white liberals. Black folks
never use this term, as far as I've ever heard.
I hear them using this _frequently_. Just abo
once again, we can count on Tim May to contribute the least productive
comment to this thread.
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:01:48PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 10:59 AM, Tyler Durden wrote:
>
> >Tim May wrote...
> >
> >"Where did this "of color" nonsense get started?"
At 02:16 PM 8/6/03 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
>> >What if all things computable are computable in polynomial time?
>
>We wouldn't have to go back to OTP, just symmetric-key keyservers
>which people used before public-key became well-known.
>
>While the public-key algorithms are based on math proble
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 08:39 PM, Mac Norton wrote:
There was a weapons charge as well, which will always complicate
matters considerably. The unconventional life is a more or less fine
thing until it gets perpendicular to the conventional life, usually in
the form of law enforcement a
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 01:17 AM, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 06:17 PM 08/05/2003 -0700, Eric Cordian wrote:
The problem here is that if you have a family and assets and
responsibility and something resembling a future, you cannot afford
to be
the 1 in 100 who refuses to plea bargain,
It's a
13 matches
Mail list logo
