On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Damn right. 'Conservative' means agreeing with the most vocal proponents
> of the current right wing apparatchiks. It seems to have little or no
> relationship to fiscally conservative ideas. "Left wing" now refers to
> anyone who disagrees with the 'C
At 06:59 AM 9/14/04 +1200, Peter Gutmann wrote:
>(The nitrate was desensitised with ammonium sulfate and stored outside,
>whenever anyone needed any they'd drill holes and blast off chunks with
>dynamite.
AN is extremely deliquescent; perhaps the sulphate was for that?
Removing chunks with dynam
At 06:23 PM 9/12/04 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
>I had thought that one of the main tests was seismic...from what I
>understood, Seismic monitors in the US can detect nu-cu-lar tests
(above or
>below ground) and even guess where and the size of the blast.
Yes. Seismic sensors see some foreshock ac
Currently BGP is "secured" by
1. accepting BGP info only from known router IPs
2. ISPs not propogating BGP from the edge inwards
Its a serious vulnerability (as in, take down the net),
equivalent to the ability to confuse the post office
machinery that sorts postcards. All you need to
do is subve
"J.A. Terranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Wow! I had no idea ammonium nitrate (ANFO for all intents and purposes,
>yes?) could produce that kind of result! How much was there?
4,500 tons, of which only 10% detonated.
(The nitrate was desensitised with ammonium sulfate and stored outside,
w
At 1:33 PM +0100 9/13/04, Ben Laurie wrote:
>Surely you should check that:
>
>a) The signature works
>b) Is someone in your list of good keys
>
>before whitelisting?
Amen.
A (cryptographic) whitelist for my friends, all others pay cash. :-)
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga
The
Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>About 4.5 kT of 50:50 ammonium nitrate/ammonium sulfate mix. One of the
>largest, if not *the* largest nonnuclear explosions ever.
The largest man-made explosion is usually claimed to be Halifax (about 3000
tons of assorted HE's), but there are a pile of o
I wonder if they include Shinomura boffing Gilmore's girlfriend in the Toad
Hall hot tub?
"Got Skills" indeed...
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 05:41:59 -0500 (CDT)
From: InfoSec News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ISN] Mitnick movie comes to th
"Ken Brown" wrote...
And if there was such a test, how long before China stomped all over them.
Last thing they want is a looney dictator with nukes on their borders (If
only to pre-empt Russia, US, or Japan intervening). Even if both the
Chinese state capitalists and the North Korean absolute
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:01:29AM -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> "No big deal"? Who are they kidding?
Has it occured to anyone this might be a covert US (or Chinese
or ) operation to destroy the PRK nuke test setup, say with cruise
missiles, stealth B2 bombers, or a infiltrated sab
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> At 12:01 AM 9/12/04 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> >"No big deal"? Who are they kidding?
>
> JAT, any large explosion will create a mushroom cloud. Its the
> blast wave reflecting off the ground that lifts the thing, plus the
> buoyancy of the h
J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
The forest fire claim sounds more plausible in this
regard. An existing cloud could be used for masking, though.
Wait a minute: since when does a forest fire create explosions? Or have
enough ground force to push up a mushroom clou
For your Sunday morning's entertainment, boys and girls, I present the
latest post-modernist circle-jerk. Put down your coffee, or you'll mess up
your keyboard.
Cheers,
RAH
Who remembers the "citizen's courts" that Mr. Bell was so fond of...
---
--- begin forwarded text
Thread-Topic: [irth
Yo RAH... I don't see a big problem here. Derrida seems right on the money
for the most part. Even this "Tribunal" has some Cypherpunk-friendly ideas
behind it: namely, it's not particularly state-oriented and its
reputation-based. Sure, he may be a little soft on a bunch of stuff, but
he's cap
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
So, since this is titled BrinCity, it surely means that the image
streams will be available from a web site and that we the people get
cameras in the emergency response center and the mayor's office?
-END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
No, this is fr
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> From: Adam Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: anonymous IP terminology (Re: [anonsec] Re: potential new IETF
>
> At ZKS we had software to remail
> MIME mail to provide a pseudonymous email. But one gotcha is that
> mail clients include MIME bou
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> "No big deal"? Who are they kidding?
A 2-mile wide cloud is WAY too big to be caused by a single explosion,
unless REALLY big. The forest fire claim sounds more plausible in this
regard. An existing cloud could be used for masking, though.
But a s
At 09:53 AM 9/12/04 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 07:50:35AM +0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, J.A. Terranson wrote:
>>
>> > "No big deal"? Who are they kidding?
>>
>> A 2-mile wide cloud is WAY too big to be caused by a single
explosion,
>> unless REALLY b
At 11:45 AM 9/12/2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Time will tell, and it certainly could have been a nuke (they have
the SNMs), but if you do it, you talk about it, much like
the Indi/Pakis did. And you can't hide a surface burst, or
even a large belowground test --and an underground test
that ven
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 07:50:35AM +0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
> > "No big deal"? Who are they kidding?
>
> A 2-mile wide cloud is WAY too big to be caused by a single explosion,
> unless REALLY big. The forest fire claim sounds more plausible in
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Bill Stewart wrote:
> When the Israeli / South African nuke test was done,
> they didn't talk about it, they pretended it hadn't happened,
> and the US government, at least publicly, has continued to
> pretend that we don't know that Israel has weapons of Mass Destruction.
A
Variola wrote...
If it *were* a nuke, it would be easy to detect --from Vera
gamma-ray satellites staring at the earth to optical sensors
(there's a characteristic nonlinear time-course of optical emissions)
to fallout monitors, ground and plane based.
--and an underground test
that vents to the at
Eric Cordian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> www.{first 10-digit prime found in the consecutive digits of e}.com
To be honest, their puzzles just aren't that impressive. If they really
want puzzle solvers, they should just recruit at the MIT Mystery Hunt.
The puzzle they presented here is would be
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
> > "No big deal"? Who are they kidding?
>
> A 2-mile wide cloud is WAY too big to be caused by a single explosion,
> unless REALLY big.
Exactly. And there aren't many things *that* big.
> The forest fi
> That of course brings us full circle: how many fuels can produce a blast
> which results in a 2+ mile mushroom? That's a *lot* of explosive force.
Blast sets off the forest fire, fire makes the smoke. Not a problem.
Go visit Northern California in late summer firestorm season
(though we don't n
"No big deal"? Who are they kidding?
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0xBD4A95BF
"...justice is a duty towards those whom you love and those whom you do
not. And people's rights will not be harmed if the opponent speaks out
about them." Osama Bin Laden
- - -
"
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 05:07:55PM -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> > http://www.muenster.org/uiw/fach/chemie/material/gif/oppau.jpg
>
> Wow! I had no idea ammonium nitrate (ANFO for all intents and purposes,
> yes?) could produce that kind of result! H
Google has an austere black on white billboard ad which simply reads.
www.{first 10-digit prime found in the consecutive digits of e}.com
People arriving solve another puzzle, and then can use the answer as a
password for a website that greets them with the message...
"One thing we l
At 12:01 AM 9/12/04 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
>"No big deal"? Who are they kidding?
JAT, any large explosion will create a mushroom cloud. Its the
blast wave reflecting off the ground that lifts the thing, plus the
buoyancy of the hot gasses.
If it *were* a nuke, it would be easy to detect -
Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://pixla.px.cz/pentagon.swf
Perhaps some of those arguments can be put to bed:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2004/110804factsstraight.htm
..not that I find either one completely convincing...
--
Riad S. Wahby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Stewart wrote:
At 03:15 PM 9/6/2004, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>
> E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10
percent
> of all spam includes such SPF records,
I have mentioned this problem more than a year a
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> http://www.muenster.org/uiw/fach/chemie/material/gif/oppau.jpg
Wow! I had no idea ammonium nitrate (ANFO for all intents and purposes,
yes?) could produce that kind of result! How much was there?
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0xBD4A95B
32 matches
Mail list logo