Moin Helge!
no, thats the other interesting part, master and clone will boot systemA, where
the cloneing took place, neither will boot systemB or C or ...
as near as i can tell all 20 are identical, there were part of one of the
earlier supercomputing efforts at the lab, all the same nodes.
i w
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:54:28PM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> i normally boot 0
>
> the interesting part is the clone disk boots fine on the original system, but
> not on either of the other systems.
Same SCSI adapter? Does your clone boot if you use the *original*
master disk?
Gree
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:40:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:15:24PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
>
> > Is the patch for this problem available as a diff, so I can patch the
> > kernel myself?
>
> kernel-image packages have previously been posted to the mailing list,
>
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:15:24PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:08:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:55:25PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
> > > I tried the netinst-Version from 15th of Juli. The problem with the broken
> > > cia_core seems still to
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:08:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:55:25PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
>
> > I tried the netinst-Version from 15th of Juli. The problem with the broken
> > cia_core seems still to exist;
>
> Correct, no kernel-image package has been uploaded w
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:55:25PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:44:53PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> > > I don't see anything new at:
> > > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/
> > >
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:40:00AM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> Hi Steve!
> ok, so what is the real functional difference?
That depends on what's being staged at any particular moment.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> >
> > sarge is
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:43:01AM -0400, Rob Dupcak wrote:
> Do the daily builds have Tulip driver support? (Or will they?)
Daily builds have included the tulip driver for as long as there have
been daily builds on alpha.
> Or asked another way...
> Is there an easy way of telling if a specific
Moin Helge!
maybe typos in there, the system is on serial console so i copied from my
notes ...
i normally boot 0
the interesting part is the clone disk boots fine on the original system, but
not on either of the other systems.
-- michael
Helge Kreutzmann schrieb am Freitag, den 16. Juli 2004:
Hello Michael,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:18:53PM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> Moin Helge!
>
> i get the normalish looking:
>
> 0:2/vmlinuz ro initrd=/initrd.imb root=/dev/sda2
> 1:2/vmlinuz.old initrd=/initrd.img
> 2:3/vmlinuz.net.gz ro root=/dev/sda2
> 3:3/vmlinuz ro root=/ev/sda2
> 8:- ro
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:59:23AM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> SystemA: good install of sarge onto /dev/sda, sda is 128M free space, 16G
> ext2 mounted on / , 2GB swap. to clone the disk i'm doing:
>
> init 1, swapoff -a, mount -n -o remount,ro /
> dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=1024k
>
, 2004 1:43 AM
> To: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: newest debian-installer on XP1000
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:25:19AM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> > Can someone tell me the difference between sarge and sid? I
> thought the
> > current debian was
ok, i'm getting myself very confused and maybe some one can give me a sanity
check.
i have a number of ES40's i'm putting sarge onto. i have it installed and
working fairly well.
now i'm trying to clone the disk image for the rest of the ES40's, this is
what i'm trying:
SystemA: good install o
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:44:53PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> > I don't see anything new at:
>
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/
>
> > will the build happen today, as in before 2400 EST?
>
> Yes; an
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:40:00AM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> Hi Steve!
>
> ok, so what is the real functional difference?
Stable (Woody at the moment): A bit dated, but very well tested and
security support available.
Testing (Sarge at the moment): Automatica
Hi Steve!
ok, so what is the real functional difference?
-- michael
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> sarge is the upcoming stable release.
>
> sid is the staging ground for everything that will go into the stable
> release being developed at any given moment.
>
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:25:19AM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> Can someone tell me the difference between sarge and sid? I thought the
> current debian was woody.
sarge is the upcoming stable release.
sid is the staging ground for everything that will go into the stable
release being develope
Can someone tell me the difference between sarge and sid? I thought the
current debian was woody.
-andy
On Jul 15, 2004, at 8:45 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:13:41PM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
Hi Andrew!
there is a build out from yesterday:
http://cdimage.debian.org
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:13:41PM -0400, Michael Galloway wrote:
> Hi Andrew!
> there is a build out from yesterday:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/alpha/20040714/
But built against the sarge tree, not the sid tree.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
> On Thu,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> I don't see anything new at:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/
> will the build happen today, as in before 2400 EST?
Yes; and it's there now.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
> On Jul 14, 2004,
Hi Andrew!
there is a build out from yesterday:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/alpha/20040714/
-- me
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Andrew Diller wrote:
> I don't see anything new at:
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/
>
> will the build happen toda
I don't see anything new at:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/
will the build happen today, as in before 2400 EST?
-andy
On Jul 14, 2004, at 6:30 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
You may also want to wait until tomorrow's daily, as it turns out the
sid_d-i dailies for alpha have b
Hi,
Do the daily builds have Tulip driver support? (Or will they?)
Or asked another way...
Is there an easy way of telling if a specific daily build has a particular
feature? (Aside from trying to install it yet again?)
Thanks,
Rob
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:36:49PM -0400,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:39:28AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:07:49PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> >>I used the one at:
> >>http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/current/
> >>but I'll try again and leave some space at
Thanks for the tips, I'll try the build from 6/15 then.
On Jul 14, 2004, at 6:30 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
You may also want to wait until tomorrow's daily, as it turns out the
sid_d-i dailies for alpha have been off-line for the better part of a
month and I'm not sure of the status of the last bui
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:07:49PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
I used the one at:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/current/
but I'll try again and leave some space at the top of the disk for
aboot. What does it need, a few megs?
Less than 1MB. A s
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:36:49PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> OK I try with one meg free. I actually have 2 xp1000s, one I'll use for
> a more stable machine with beta4, the other I can test the dailies and
> see what's up.
Please note that there is no substantial difference between beta4 and
OK I try with one meg free. I actually have 2 xp1000s, one I'll use for
a more stable machine with beta4, the other I can test the dailies and
see what's up.
So far Sarge looks nice. It's been a few years since I played with
Debian, mostly it was on my Ipaq. I am thinking of using this alpha
w
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:07:49PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> I used the one at:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/current/
> but I'll try again and leave some space at the top of the disk for
> aboot. What does it need, a few megs?
Less than 1MB. A single sector s
I used the one at:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/current/
but I'll try again and leave some space at the top of the disk for
aboot. What does it need, a few megs?
-andy
On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
What is the URL of the ISO image you downloaded?
Hi Andrew!
i've better success on my ES40's with the 20040713 build:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/alpha/
still somewhat problematic, it installs e100 instead of eepro100, but it may
work ok for you ...
-- michael
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Andrew Diller wrote:
> hello: I
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:44:04PM -0400, Andrew Diller wrote:
> hello: I downloaded burned and installed the newest (2004-06-08 posted
> on alphalinux.org) debian installer on my xp1000.
> Everything is smooth, i chose an automatic, multi-user partition map on
> a single 9gig scsi disk. I chan
hello: I downloaded burned and installed the newest (2004-06-08 posted
on alphalinux.org) debian installer on my xp1000.
Everything is smooth, i chose an automatic, multi-user partition map on
a single 9gig scsi disk. I changed the / partition to ext2 for the
aboot and continued.
however, the
33 matches
Mail list logo
