rces.list?
https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
o work
around people's laziness :/
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
he2.git/tree/debian/apache2.postinst
We can't use dpkg-maintscript helper for the reason you named, as we
renamed the package "owning" it. However, I believe, we cleanly
remove/take-over the conffiles in the best way dpkg allows us.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeepe
ents.htm
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rs=debian-apache@lists.debian.org;archive=both
[2]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=apache24webapptransition;users=debian-apache@lists.debian.org;archive=both
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 23.09.2014 15:01, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2014-09-23 14:43:49 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
>> We install this file through dh_installlogrotate and it is listed as a
>> conffile in the binary package of apache2. That means, it will be
>> handled like any other configuratio
regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
dencies are not guaranteed to be present during postrm, so
>the disconf is not guaranteed to happen.
>
It is actually preferred that disconf is called in prerm. This is also
what dh-apache2 would do if you let it. Or in both scripts. I am not
sure why this is isn't written more explicit in the wiki but I will fix
that in a minute.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nge of permissions to
use it for your own purposes.
As for functionality, I don't know. It's your software :-)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hen set to on, and this code hasn't changed a long time.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
a few fixes,
whereas the package itself just works fine. Not that they would depend
on apache2.2-bin.
> (Are there more such usertags?)
No, there are not.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
reassign mpm-itk
thanks
Steinar,
On 05.04.2014 17:01, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> This is almost certainly a configuration issue. It sounds like he is hitting
> suexec or suphp.
I'm handing this over to you now that itk is its own package.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: d
note 2: We kinda expected this
situation and added a trapdoor in Wheezy [1], but it turned out, that
even that is not good enough to prevent havoc with --purge-unused.
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-apache/apache2.git;a=blob;f=debian/apache2.2-common.postrm;h=bbe9f740b81cf8af64412
merge 752922 711925
thanks
Hi,
This is a duplicate of #711925. I will merge the isse you reported.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
reassign 753851 libapache2-mod-php5
thanks
Hi Rainer,
yes - this is indeed an issue in PHP. gc_remove_zval_from_buffer sounds
like PHP tries to access a freed value. I'm reassigning to PHP, maybe
they can tell you more about.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode
Steinar,
could you please comment on that? I have no experience with itk
whatsoever. Therefore, I do not how if this is a problem in itk or a
configuration issue.
Moreover, please reasign this bug to the itk source package, if this is
a still persisting problem.
--
with kind regards,
Arno
y vendor`.
However, that implies that you send back changed to use you'd like to
have in "your" index.html.
Alternatively, we could also try to find a page version that fits both
of us (though that may confuse users).
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
=128/128);Fri, 21
Feb 2014 00:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5307132d.8030...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:49:49 +0100
From: Marco Righi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arno Töll
Subject: Re: Bug#
bits=128/128);Thu, 20
Feb 2014 07:18:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <53061ccb.4020...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:18:35 +0100
From: Marco Righi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arno Töll
Subject: Re: Bug#
t happens if you execute "apachectl start". You know,
anything.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
p://keyring.debian.org/replacing_keys.html
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
release code on
behalf of the httpd project.
I do not mind removing "weak" keys again, but then I wonder if there is
an actual benefit if Jim for once doesn't sign a release.
Either way, we should move this discussion to upstream I guess.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: da
init.d scripts. In this case, I claim, It's legit to assume that
you take care of creating the directories you need in your (private)
configuration yourself.
I'd think that it is Debian's job to provide an environment which can be
started off the default configuration, but
t; > debian/upstream-signing-key.pgp
thanks for that suggestion. I added your patch for the upcoming package
upload. I did, however, add the full keyring of Apache developers that
/could/ sign a release as listed in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS
--
with kind regards,
A
ow that the transition is over, we could reintroduce a -common
transitional package, but again, we will carefully evaluate this before,
as this causes lots of side-effects.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Descri
web server listening on port
80 by default - don't you think?
I agree that this is a borderline case to insanity (and not even my
decision back then). but that's the way it is for Apache 2.2. Luckily we
do not need to worry anymore as in 2.4 MPMs are regular modules and do
not need a special treatment anymore.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(such as apache2-mpm-itk), which corresponds
> to what apache2-bin now provides?
>
At least that seems not to cause problems, so I may add it for the next
upload unless I find another unwanted side-effect.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
testing. Could you let me know if this fixes the issue for you?
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-apache/apache2.git;a=commit;h=7bbd9734dcb2403505805301c94a6300d225f386
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Des
dpkg-query -f '${Conffiles}\n' -W apache2
is?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is not conforming to backport policies.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07.08.2013 21:39, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 02:39:41PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
>>> * The only way to ship a package named apache2.2-common is to add a
>>>Breaks header listing every single reverse dependency with correct
>>>version in
On 05.08.2013 16:26, Arno Töll wrote:
> It's your responsibility if you use this option or apt's equivalent.
> This is the same problem as #717476. Refer there too, why an
> apache2.2-common package is problematic.
err. #711925 I mean. #717476 is a duplicate of the same issue,
finally
(but possibly open a new can'o'worms).
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
age is "do not remove it". If you
still do, it's your business to deal with the situation. Same for these
modules - however, I agree that we need to communicate this more
prominently (again, see #709461).
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID:
at the state, because
apache2.2-common is going to be removed by upgrading to 2.4.
I am not sure if an empty 2.2-common package in addition to that would
solve that problem, as it would ship none of the conffiles either, so
consequently they would still be purged.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
at. It is, however, not going to
solve this bug in particular as the conffiles would have to move
regardless from apache2.2-common to apache2 which is the root cause with
--purge-unsued.
It may solve other problems you have though, e.g. your pre-depdency in
PHP and so on.
--
with kind regards,
Arno
ys enabled. However,
some people might still prefer to disable them by free choice and that's
something we have to respect in compliance with the policy and in hope
these people know what they are doing.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9
ut when the problem occurs, looking at the apache2-doc config
> gives the answer).
Yes. See #709461.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n upgrade or not (though this might be a debatable choice in
view of policy correctness) or get apt[itude] maintainers to display a
warning when using --purge-unused during a dist-upgrade.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 24.07.2013 16:13, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> So your problem should be gone now.
>
> So you could get a few new bug reports tomorrow :-)
"Yay"
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
paultag to have a look at it, and he confirmed it was removed
by him yesterday: https://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.822.
So your problem should be gone now.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
filter deflate \
status ; do
a2enmod -m -q $module
done
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ore (enabled by maintainer script)
php5 (enabled by unknown)
access_compat (enabled by maintainer script)
cgi (enabled by unknown)
deflate (enabled by unknown)
authz_groupfile (enabled by unknown)
status (enabled by unknown)
filter (enabled by maintainer script)
unique_id (enabled by unknown)
root@build:
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
are definitely not going back that road.
That being said please note, that NameVirtualHost itself is deprecated
and not used anymore in Apache2 2.4. There is no chance to fix this in
Debian Stable anyway due to our freezing policy, and the next Debian
release will have Apache2 2.4 only, not using N
nconditionally in a
apache2 2.4 installation.
Packags must not use such directives without protecting them with
. Please see our packaging guidelines at [1].
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-apache/apache2.git;a=blob;f=debian/PACKAGING;hb=master#l194
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemo
ond their 10 day waiting period.
[1]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=apache24transition;users=debian-apache@lists.debian.org;archive=both
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
eir 10 day waiting period.
[1]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=apache24transition;users=debian-apache@lists.debian.org;archive=both
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
version information.
That would be 100+ Breaks. I do not think that is feasible but that may
need a wider discussion.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
orted).
we cannot do this as long as the transition is ongoing. Sadly lots of
packages reverse-depends on on apache2.2-common. Satisfying this
dependency would create (even more) havoc on such systems as apt would
not force a removal of packages depending ob not provided ABIs.
--
with kind regards,
A
rking*
team, and I see no problem to use debian-apache@l.d.o for that purpose.
I might even join that team. ;-)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
of
blocking bugs is not what you think it is meant for.
The list of blocking bug is only for coordination with the Release Team
and is not related to criteria qualifying for the transition to happen
or not (it started already anyway).
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenod
On 11.06.2013 10:41, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> On Di, 11 Jun 2013, Arno Töll wrote:
>> Thus, either mod_alias was disabled by you, or not enabled on your
>> system for some other reason (which then might be the "real" bug). Could
>> you help us on
allow people (and so ourselvses) to
use directives from this core set unconditionally.
Thus, either mod_alias was disabled by you, or not enabled on your
system for some other reason (which then might be the "real" bug). Could
you help us on that and tell us more?
--
with kind regar
not sure what we could do in cases
where another daemon, within or outside the chroot, binds to the same
listening interface already?
In that case it is expected that the init script fails, because apache2
itself fails to start.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
Gnu
or the next upload to Sid, but I don't think we are going to change it
for Wheezy, but I let this up to sf to decide.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
probably a policy violation.)
looks like you hit a bull's eye here. See #710519, #683654 and #710571.
For now I'll make the script (a bit) more verbose by default and let
people come up with whatever they decide on a project-wide basis and
implement that later.
--
with kind regards,
Arn
o. You purge Apache
related packages, but you leave back reverse dependencies (e.g. you
still had mod-dnssd and php5 installed). These are left in config-file
state, and thus let back the conffiles they install into "our" directories.
Logs, however, are deliberately not purged.
--
wit
valid point. However, I'm pretty sure we did this on
purpose back then. Sadly I don't remember details anymore as this
transition was originally meant to happen for Wheezy. I think this was
somehow related to the MPM packages disappearing.
I am going to test this again and let you
per(1) or dh_installdeb(1) if you are using debhelper.
Doesn't that work good enough?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
severity 707024 serious
thanks
Apache 2.4 is not supposed to enter Testing yet. That breaks lots of
stuff. Let's rather rush in once much more modules are ported.
Hence, making this bug serious so that Britney does not consider letting
us in.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonk
fbb98903
in a way it applies to kfreebsd, too. This leaves itk broken in the
package, but I guess that's something we can live with for the time being.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hiding problems.
(err, actually resending my response to the bug and not to the list)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hiding problems.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: apache2
Severity: wishlist
For my own remembering: a2dismod should warn when users try to disable
modules we enable by default, as we allow packages to use statements
from it unconditionally.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
LAYED queue
to make timed upload [2].
[1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/#dinstall
[2] http://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ing on on d-devel
related to that.
Could you please clarify?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nce I believe, an upload on that date is
feasible.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 681545 pending
thanks
Hi,
along with the fix for #681546 I also changed the behavior for postinst.
It's called unconditionally now in postinst, as we disable the module in
prerm now, so that we need to cover the rollback case again.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeep
prerm, not postrm.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ink we're going to fix that for Wheezy though, as the problem
is noisy but harmless.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/gitweb/?p=pkg-apache/apache2.git;a=blob;f=debian/PACKAGING;hb=next#l79
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jonathan,
we're approaching Sid so I'm coming back to your bug. Do you have any
suggestion what you'd like to read in the NEWS file?
As I read the remaining discussion of this bug, I think everything else
was clarified already, right?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC:
ikely to
split out the itk package soon, so that the issue can be addresses
properly there.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
whether the module was enabled
> by default.
as promised, I implemented a switch. The next upload will feature a
dh_apache2 which has a -e|--noenable option which does not install
postinst hooks, but lets others untouched.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
Gn
I've prepared a working patch for mod_security. It is ready to be NMUed
unless the maintainer steps in. The patch is in #666848.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
As a follow-up:
- PHP is ready in experimental
- JK is ready in experimental
- mod-dnssd has a patch
- mod-wsgi has a patch
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-share; #666829)
- mod_jk (#666851)
- mod_fcgid (#666863)
- subversion (#666794)
Let's track progress here.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ound is to change /etc/apache2/envvars to
> APACHE_ULIMIT_MAX_FILES='sleep 0.01'
You could just set it to "true" or whatever other no-op. Just make sure
it's defined (i.e. non-zero).
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9
tags 704639 +pending
thanks
Hello Bastian,
thanks for spotting and your patch. I've just committed it to git and
we'll feature it in the upcoming 2.4 upload.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Descriptio
useful debugging information to PHP maintainers.
Please reassign back to Apache2 in the unlikely case the backtrace
reveals a problem in a core module.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ng languages run as www-data, but let them run as
their own user.
If you have several virtual hosts that's required, otherwise a script
vulnerability in one vhost causes security implications to the remaining
hosts, because an attacker can access that data.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
ult umask by configuring /etc/apache2/envvars.
If you prfer, it also works to override the umask in /etc/init.d/apache2
which will be inherited to Apache.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
les? Did we have a good reason which I simply forgot?
Otherwise I may fix it by enabling the module as Thijs suggests.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 702475 experimental
notfound 702475 2.2.22-12
thanks
On 08.03.2013 18:46, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:55:39AM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
>> While testing the 2.4.4 upload I noticed the ITK MPM does not load anymore,
>> because it is underlinked despite
h kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
pache2-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.4.4-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Apache Maintainers
Changed-By: Arno Töll
Description:
...
libapache2-mod-proxy-html - Transitional package for apache2-bin
-
--
wit
Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.2
Severity: serious
While testing the 2.4.4 upload I noticed the ITK MPM does not load anymore,
because it is underlinked despite of -lcap being there and used. I don't know
enough about the ITK MPM to know where the problem exactly is.
Trying to load їt yields:
ap
is not
> enabled or wasn't previously installed, nothing should be done by
> default in postinst. The postrm handling would remain the same.
We do so, don't we? At least we wrote code which should do right that,
but it might have bugs of course :>
--
with kind regards,
tend to be annoyed when the web server is restarted during upgrades.
Hence, I do believe "configure" is correct, but I might try some of the
abort/failure cases you mentioned before deciding what to do eventually
with your bug.
Does my explanation make sense to you?
--
with kind r
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:16:33 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:16:33 +0100
From: Christophe GUILLOUX
To: Arno Töll
Subject: Re: Bug#701117: Apache : Custom ErrorDocument 400 not working
when
tches the bug you mentioned. The
bug you linked is about custom error page handling when clients
violating the HTTP 1.1 protocol are requesting pages.
Do you mind to explain?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description
which is obsolete :-(
>
> 2.2.22: Released January 31, 2012
> 2.4.2 : Released April 17, 2012 (before wheezy freezing)
Sorry, what?
> Other bug : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592937
>
[1] http://packages.debian.org/source/testing/libapache-mod-fastcgi
--
with
2.init;h=130c0f533d18abea263622dbd2673f134989b5ad;hb=refs/heads/next
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
2.2/mod/core.html#virtualhost
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rl was the problem, it would fail out
there.
> The installation was done using multistrap which postpones more postinst
> scripts than debootstrap and debian-installer.
Perhaps multistrap should be fixed then.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID:
/anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-apache/apache2.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/300_disable-ssl-compression.dpatch;h=fd497646c6fe675d47821f729cff8b516319c2d7;hb=refs/heads/squeeze
It is not available in any package (we support) yet.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenod
date to
Stable. But since this is not a critical issue [1] and since uploads to
Stable are extremely sensitive it may well be we wait for another issue
we need to fix in Stable as well.
[1] it is a browser issue in reality, no really.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
