On Thursday 09 November 2017 02:33:40 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/
> > http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/
>
> These aren't Debian mirrors, so you are going to have to ask the
> Raspbian and LinuxCNC folks about t
On 09/11/17 06:22, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 09 November 2017 00:54:52 Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I did an update on an armhf/jessie install last night, and noticed
that all the files for translations were missing, which resulted in
quite a bit o
On 2017-11-07, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative
> is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations
> for a nonexisting problem.
Have we gotten full c++11 support on armel yet ?
(future, atomic, ...)
/Sune
std::future was fixed a while ago by upstream. It now works on any target even
when there are no lock-free atomics in hardware.
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Btw, prior that, you would actually need at least ARMv7.
Adrian
> On Nov 9, 2017, at 6:40 PM, Sune Vuorela wr
On Thursday 09 November 2017 10:29:06 peter green wrote:
> On 09/11/17 06:22, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 November 2017 00:54:52 Paul Wise wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>> I did an update on an armhf/jessie install last night, and noticed
> >>> that
On Thursday 09 November 2017 12:40:59 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2017-11-07, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative
> > is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations
> > for a nonexisting problem.
>
> Have we gotten full c++11 support on arme
6 matches
Mail list logo