Regis Boudin wrote:
> * debconf/frontend: debconf and cdebconf have different names for the
> frontends (Readline, Dialog, Gnome, versus text, newt, gtk), which causes
> all sorts of issues for the transition. Any objection to using
> cdebconf/frontend instead ?
Not really, but the rest of d-i wo
- Forwarded message from Andrew Gavrilin -
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:28:36 +0400 (MSD)
From: Andrew Gavrilin
To: j...@kitenet.net, jo...@debian.org
Subject: os-prober: bsd detection and new linux detection
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0
(Linux)/6.0.10_GA_
Hi Joey,
On Thu, October 6, 2011 16:07, Joey Hess wrote:
> Regis Boudin wrote:
>> * debconf/frontend: debconf and cdebconf have different names for the
>> frontends (Readline, Dialog, Gnome, versus text, newt, gtk), which
>> causes
>> all sorts of issues for the transition. Any objection to using
Dennis Boone wrote:
> Trivial issue: partitioner allows invalid characters in file system
> labels, then mkfs phase throws a red screen error. Easily enough
> figured out and fixed from the log console, just silly of it.
> (I initially set the label for the sole -- root -- partition to "/".)
You
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt :
test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/
rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not
empty
[...]
$ debdiff kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
kernel-i
> You don't say what filesystem you used. zfs? ufs?
UFS.
> Linux file systems don't have any restrictions on label contents and
> probably the partman code for whatever filesystem you used was copied
> from them.
Yup, that was my guess.
> I would need to see a log file to say for sure, but
partman-partitioning_83_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_83.dsc
partman-partitioning_83.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_83_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_83.dsc
to main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_83.dsc
partman-partitioning_83.tar.gz
to main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_83.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_83_amd64.udeb
to main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_83_amd64.udeb
partman-auto_100_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_100.dsc
partman-auto_100.tar.gz
partman-auto_100_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...
Accepted:
partman-auto_100.dsc
to main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_100.dsc
partman-auto_100.tar.gz
to main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_100.tar.gz
partman-auto_100_amd64.udeb
to main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_100_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-auto_100.dsc - sourc
rootskel_1.98_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.98.dsc
rootskel_1.98.tar.gz
rootskel_1.98_amd64.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.98_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2011 17:02:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637970: fixed in partman-auto 100
has caused the Debian Bug report #637970,
regarding Enable LVM in mipsel/loongson-2f recipes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.98_amd64.udeb
to main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.98_amd64.udeb
rootskel_1.98.dsc
to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.98.dsc
rootskel_1.98.tar.gz
to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.98.tar.gz
rootskel_1.98_amd64.udeb
to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.98_amd64.udeb
Just for the records - this problem appears when you call lvremove
within the /target chroot environment by in-target.
If you remove in-target from your late_command and by this invoke
lvremove within d-i's rootfs, it works.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.deb
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
> kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
> verify earlier than that).
>
What's the status of that upload?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:16, Joey Hess wrote:
> Hello. I work at ROSA Lab. It's a partner of Mandriva. We will use os-prober
> for our installer. These are my improvements.
I talked to him and he is working at producing a new patch that
doesn't depends on bash and going to send it again.
Andre
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze3.1_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze3.1.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze3.1.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.74+squeeze3.1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.o
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau :
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
>> kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
>> verify earlier than that).
>>
> What's the status of that upload?
I rea
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt :
> Forgive my ignorance on the precise mechanics, but is it correct that the
> /boot/kernel/kernel.gz symlink creation was also removed?
Yes, this is all curft for backward compatibility with versions of
Debian GNU/kFreeBSD that have never been part of a Debian release.
kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386_0.6.1_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386_0.6.1.dsc
kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386_0.6.1.tar.gz
kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6.1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
nic-modules-8.1-1-486-di_0.6.1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
nic-wir
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
nullfs-modules-8.1-1-486-di_0.6.1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb: package says priority is
standard, override says extra.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive:
> Andrew, can you post it here?
Yes. New version.
- Исходное сообщение -
От: "Otavio Salvador"
Кому: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Копия: "Andrew Gavrilin"
Отправленные: Пятница, 7 Октябрь 2011 г 0:21:19
Тема: Re: os-prober: bsd detection and new linux detection
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1
22 matches
Mail list logo
