On 08/02/2014 02:30, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Well, today I have talked about consolekit alternatives at Gnome IRC and one
> guy quote logind port from canonical to work without systemd. I asked for a
> link but he doesn't have a link. Do you know about that? The only website I
> fo
Package: kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64
Version: 11.0~svn260666-1
Severity: important
With Newcons it becomes practically impossible to use the console. When
using the default VESA driver, both VT switching and text scrolling
become terribly slow. Either of these operations takes almost 1 s!
Newcons
Now that ConsoleKit has been deprecated/abandoned by its upstream I guess
this makes it extremely likely that it will soon turn into garbage/bitrot,
very similar to the HAL experience (it seems we already had a taste of things
to come in #570015...).
I've been trying to figure out what ConsoleKit
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 01:29:43PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64
> Version: 11.0~svn259528-2
> Severity: grave
>
> On 20/12/2013 11:05, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > Unfortunately ip4 networking doesn't work anymore with freebsd 11 but
> > works fine when I use kf
Hi all!
I had downgraded apt in the buildd chroots due to #732937. However
this makes aptitude uninstallable:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> aptitude : Depends: libapt-pkg4.12 (>= 0.9.11) but 0.9.7.9+deb7u1 is to be
> installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have he
On 08/02/2014 15:20, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I had downgraded apt in the buildd chroots due to #732937. However
> this makes aptitude uninstallable:
>
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> aptitude : Depends: libapt-pkg4.12 (>= 0.9.11) but 0.9.7.9+deb7u1 is to be
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:51:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#642468: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #642468,
regarding kfreebsd-8|9 does not provide any method to use non-free firmware
blobs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
kfreebsd-10_10.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-10_10.0-2.dsc
kfreebsd-10_10.0-2.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-10.0_10.0-2_all.deb
kfreebsd-headers-10.0-1_10.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kfreebsd-image-10.0-1-amd64_10.0-2_kfreebsd-amd6
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:14:00 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-10
Binary: kfreebsd-source-10.0 kfreebsd-headers-10.0-1
kfreebsd-image-10.0-1-amd64 kfreebsd-image-10-amd64
kfreebsd-headers-10.0-1-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-10-amd64
kerne
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn261628-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn261628-1.dsc
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn261628.orig.tar.xz
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn261628-1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-11.0_11.0~svn261628-1_all.deb
kfreebsd-headers-1
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:50:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#732693: fixed in kfreebsd-11 11.0~svn261628-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #732693,
regarding unable to setup DHCP in kfreebsd-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:17:30 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-11
Binary: kfreebsd-source-11.0 kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0
kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64 kfreebsd-image-11-amd64
kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-11-amd64
kerne
On 2014-02-08, Robert Millan wrote:
> 3- Is there anything else?
In cooperation with polkit figuring out when to elevate privileges. E.g.
allowing the user sitting at the computer to e.g. mount usb sticks,
handle poweroff and such things.
In your quest for logind feature replacements, you should
On 08/02/2014 18:57, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2014-02-08, Robert Millan wrote:
>> 3- Is there anything else?
>
> In cooperation with polkit figuring out when to elevate privileges. E.g.
> allowing the user sitting at the computer to e.g. mount usb sticks,
Unfortunately device automount broke muc
kfreebsd-defaults_10+1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-defaults_10+1.dsc
kfreebsd-defaults_10+1.tar.gz
kfreebsd-image-amd64_10+1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kfreebsd-headers-amd64_10+1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
Hi Robert!
Robert Millan writes:
> On 08/02/2014 15:20, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I had downgraded apt in the buildd chroots due to #732937. However
>> this makes aptitude uninstallable:
>>
>>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>> aptitude : Depends: libapt-pkg4.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:43:57 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-defaults
Binary: kfreebsd-image-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-amd64 kfreebsd-image-486
kfreebsd-headers-486 kfreebsd-image-686 kfreebsd-headers-686 kfreebsd-image-xen
kfreebsd-h
On 8 February 2014 18:57, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2014-02-08, Robert Millan wrote:
>> 3- Is there anything else?
>
> In cooperation with polkit figuring out when to elevate privileges. E.g.
> allowing the user sitting at the computer to e.g. mount usb sticks,
> handle poweroff and such things.
>
On 2014-02-08, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> For that there is https://launchpad.net/pam-xdg-support that should be
> fairly portable and minimal pam module.
I have the impression that that tool is around as alive and kicking as
HAL and ConsoleKit
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-r
On 08.02.2014 14:29, Robert Millan wrote:
[...]
> This problem appears to be fixed when using freebsd-net-tools 10.0-2 or later
> (but NOT 10.0-1, whose ifconfig is badly broken!).
>
> Please can you confirm this works for you, too? In the meantime I'll update
> the
> dependency in kfreebsd-11, b
Version: 1.27.1-1
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> tar FTBFS since 1.27-1 due to failure of extrac09.at in the testsuite.
>
> The problem occurred only on kFreeBSD and Hurd [...]
The most recent upload (looks like an upstream bugfix-only release)
seems to have fixed this issue and built fine on
Control: severity -1 wishlist
This package never built on kfreebsd in sid before, so this bug does not
need to have RC severity.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
22 matches
Mail list logo
