Bug#1056765: gcc-9: Remove references to obsolete dpkg m32r and tilegx arches

patch that removes references to these obsolete arches. Thanks, Guillem From 4374a74a6f4f48d2bdf59561a8dfbf751bc0d629 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 23:44:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove references to obsolete m32r and tilegx arches Support for these arches got

Bug#1056763: gdb: Remove references to obsolete dpkg m32r arch

removes references to this obsolete arch. Thanks, Guillem From 579b5525be1fd188730b1bac888018629d0f2de7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 23:36:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove references to obsolete m32r arch Support for this arch got removed from in dpkg

Bug#1056761: python3.12: Remove references to obsolete dpkg avr32 arch

that removes references to this obsolete arch. Thanks, Guillem From 9285d636afb9de383345fb5457c4ff17bbfe8ea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 23:08:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove references to obsolete avr32 arch Support for this arch got removed from in dpkg

Bug#1056760: python3.11: Remove references to obsolete dpkg avr32 arch

that removes references to this obsolete arch. Thanks, Guillem From 3f971478072c67ae6a0009edf5b7cad90c4cd4d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 23:08:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove references to obsolete avr32 arch Support for this arch got removed from in dpkg

Bug#1056759: python3.10: Remove references to obsolete dpkg avr32 arch

that removes references to this obsolete arch. Thanks, Guillem From 319681ede4f39f2ca520ccc878853809b5aa94a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 23:08:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove references to obsolete avr32 arch Support for this arch got removed from in dpkg

Bug#1056750: u-boot: Remove reference to obsolete avr32 arch

these references. Thanks, Guillem From 9292d37f89e2c56e1fc205947c72dc3518b97ead Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 21:34:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove avr32 arch support removed in dpkg 1.22.0 The avr32 arch support was removed in dpkg 1.22.0, and once the host

Bug#1056748: mariadb: References obsolete tilegx architecture

software might be unhappy about the unknown architecture. Attached patch remove the reference. Thanks, Guillem From 44cda54868242e842000162e3ab21a621f97b94f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 21:23:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove tilegx support removed from dpkg

Bug#1056745: smartmontools: Hurd portability and dpkg arch fixes

upgraded to that dpkg version. Attached a pair of patches fixing these. Test built on hurd-i386. Thanks, Guillem From 16b6f07ebf31662309bdcbf83d9b4681c1a99928 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 02:06:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Do not use libsystemd on non-Linux

Bug#1056373: musescore-general-soundfont: Uses dpkg --no-uniform-compression

On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 01:57:50 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Guillem Jover dixit: > >the above (waiting for EOL, or the dpkg update, or compressing > >everything with gzip) are not good options, I guess I could wait a > >bit more until say dpkg 1.23.x? It's not urgent

Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec

Hi! On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 10:52:40 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > I guess I could do it the other way, and given this is apparently > causing issues as reported by Adrian, and as seen recently from > the referenced bug report which might require patching a specific > package to disab

Bug#1055605: fstack-clash-protection hardening change breaks building packages with clang on arm64

Control: severity -1 wishlist Hi! On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 19:00:59 +0100, Hugo Melder wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.22.0 > Severity: important > The recent change (https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=11efff1bf) > breaks building Debian packages with clang on arm64. So in pr

Bug#1056373: musescore-general-soundfont: Uses dpkg --no-uniform-compression

Hi! On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 23:58:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >This package uses this option, so I was wondering whether it can be > >removed now? > > I would very much like to keep this option. It allows users of > older (in some cases very old) distributions to install the > binary package

Bug#1056377: sysbench: Update Architecture field

list needs to be kept up to date with additions and removals from dpkg. Attached the proposed patch. Thanks, Guillem From ad9ae368d5d146546ba7b234cabf6349138b07df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 01:22:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] debian: Switch Architecture back t

Bug#1056375: fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont: Uses dpkg --no-uniform-compression

Source: fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont Source-Version: 2.315-7 Severity: wishlist Hi! I've been pondering obsoleting the dpkg-deb --no-uniform-compression option to simplify the format going forward (even though dpkg-deb will keep accepting such packages for unpack. This package uses this option, so I

Bug#1056373: musescore-general-soundfont: Uses dpkg --no-uniform-compression

Source: musescore-general-soundfont Source-Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: wishlist Hi! I've been pondering obsoleting the dpkg-deb --no-uniform-compression option to simplify the format going forward (even though dpkg-deb will keep accepting such packages for unpack. This package uses this option, s

Bug#1056374: musescore-general-soundfont-small: Uses dpkg --no-uniform-compression

Source: musescore-general-soundfont-small Source-Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: wishlist Hi! I've been pondering obsoleting the dpkg-deb --no-uniform-compression option to simplify the format going forward (even though dpkg-deb will keep accepting such packages for unpack. This package uses this opt

Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

Hi! On Tue, 2023-11-14 at 17:29:01 +1100, Craig Small wrote: > What: > Create a new package procps-base. This uses the existing procps source > package and just enable building of pidof. procps-base will be an Essential > package and only contain pidof. > > Why: > This would bring the pidof varia

Bug#1055580: dlt-daemon: Runs daemon as user nobody with owned files on fsys

Package: dlt-daemon Version: 2.18.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: security Hi! This daemon runs as user nobody, while creating multiple files on the filesystem owned by the same user, which are used as part of its security protection. This is a security issue, given that other daemons on the system m

Bug#1055536: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps refuses to print version number in the absence of ./debian/control

Hi! On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 23:43:29 +0100, Marc Jeanmougin wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.22.1 > Severity: important > Since 1.22 (does happen in 1.22.1, did not happen in 1.21.21), > running "dpkg-shlibdeps --version" prints > > --- > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot read debian/control: N

Bug#1055535: dlt-daemon: Test suite is no parallel safe

Source: dlt-daemon Source-Version: 2.18.10-5 Severity: normal Hi! The problem in #1054999 was about the test suite not being parallel safe, as it uses the same log files under /tmp, which means when executed in parallel causes race conditions. Each test should get its own test file, ideally unde

Bug#1054999: dlt-daemon: FTBFS: 5: /bin/sh: 1: killall: not found

e locally. (I'm filing another report for the /tmp stuff.) Attached a series of patches that "fix" this (and some of other cleanups. The only ones needed to workaround this problem are patch 2 and 3. Although ideally the test suite would be made parallel safe by using different files for

Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec

Hi! On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 13:12:48 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:23:43AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 00:02:46 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > There are some problems with this: > > > > > > 1. PIE sho

Bug#1054583: dpkg-dev: really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel

Hi! On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 12:55:32 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 11:40:53 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > Package: dpkg-dev > > Version: 1.22.0 > > Severity: normal > > -fstack-clash-protection is supposed to be enabled by default on amd64,

Bug#1054552: glibc: stat fails when access time is bogus

Hi! On Thu, 2023-10-26 at 19:27:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > control: reassign -1 dpkg > control: retitle -1 dpkg: stat fails on 32-bit systems when access time is > bogus > On 2023-10-25 23:29, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 20:53:57 +0200, Jarek Czekalski wrote: > > > I

Bug#1053481: libdpkg-perl: dpkg-source fails to generate (complete) Testsuite-Triggers if test deps have :native qualifier

Hi! On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 20:44:26 -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:11:32AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Right, nice catch! Given that these fields are based on what might > > appear on build dependencies, I think it does make sense to consider > > t

Bug#1054583: dpkg-dev: really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel

based arches which might not support this. I've queued the attached patch for my next push. I'll try to get a release out during the weekend. Thanks, Guillem From 59234629857aa5910e27d0fadb3dfe29fbb3996d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 12:48:21 +0200 Subje

Bug#1002056: Fedora plans to transition to Zlib-ng

Hi! On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 14:13:54 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > JFTR, Fedora is planning to transition to Zlib-ng > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ZlibNGTransition Ah, thanks! I had in my mind getting back to this ITP, given that the zlib-ng project has continued to gain tract

Bug#1053705: dpkg-dev: please use a different word than Maintainer from dpkg-parsechangelog

On Mon, 2023-10-09 at 07:59:05 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.22.0 > Severity: minor > The use of Maintainer in the output of dpkg-parsechangelog is > confusing, because it suggests that dpkg-parsechangelog is reporting > the Maintainer field from debian/control. I su

Bug#1053778: dpkg: add loong64 to mask builtin feature list

Hi! [ In the future make sure to send mails to the Debian bug tracker as plain not-flowed text, otherwise that messes up with the pseudo-header formatting. Thanks! ] On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 09:31:01 +0800, yalingfang wrote: > Package: dpkg Version: 1.22.0 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: > de

Bug#699208: marked as done (s-s-d: on kFreeBSD fails to stop mpd on upgrade)

Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 s-s-d: On kFreeBSD fails to find deleted exec filename On Sat, 2023-10-07 at 14:16:08 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > kFreeBSD has been removed from Debian ports: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2023/07/msg3.html This report is still a v

Bug#1053481: libdpkg-perl: dpkg-source fails to generate (complete) Testsuite-Triggers if test deps have :native qualifier

Hi! On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 20:17:58 -0400, James McCoy wrote: > Package: libdpkg-perl > Version: 1.18.8 > Severity: normal > Control: affects -1 src:zsh src:poppler src:libjodycode src:doxygen > src:jemalloc src:jdupes src:libsdl2 src:iproute2 > Any test stanza in a debian/tests/control file whic

Bug#1053437: opendmarc: Support for sqlite

Package: opendmarc Version: 1.4.2-3 Severity: wishlist Hi! It looks like MySQL/MariaDB is only used by the reports/ scripts, and the schema in db/schema.mysql is indeed MySQL specific. It would be nice if these scrips could use SQLite instead (well in addition that is). Thanks, Guillem

Bug#1053435: opendmarc: No longer used OpenDBX Recommends

Source: opendmarc Source-Version: 1.4.2-3 Severity: normal Hi! While checking this package I noticed that OpenDBX is no longer used, as I see no references to it at all from the code, where the last ones got removed in upstream commit 572cdedad70fb7101ee8a2c2ff58ce5e0b8435f0. So it looks to me l

Bug#910377: System-critical package management

[ CCing #910377 for some context. ] Hi! On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 11:59:47 +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > > The lack of any system of recognition for packages that are critical to > > system operation impedes the reliability of Debian-based systems. For > > example, a reboot during a background pack

Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var

Hi! On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 22:17:44 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: > > Russ Allbery writes: > >> Maybe the right way to do this is just have two examples, one as the > >> default and another if you're using tmpfiles.d functionality added in a > >> specific version of systemd th

Bug#1051902: bullseye-pu: package dpkg/1.20.13

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg Hi! [ Reason ] This update backports the loong64 arch support as requested in #1051763 because some of the D

Bug#1051763: dpkg: Please backport support for loong64 to oldstable and stable

On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 09:20:46 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 22:34 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I guess I could backport it to dpkg 1.20.x for oldstable, but if the > > infra servers are going to be upgraded soon (at least out of oldstable >

Bug#793499: debian-policy: The Installed-Size algorithm is out-of-date

Hi! On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 18:04:41 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.9.7.0 > Severity: wishlist > As discussed in the debian-policy list, the Installed-Size algorithm > as implemented in dpkg-gencontrol changed due to #650077. So the > current

Bug#1051763: dpkg: Please backport support for loong64 to oldstable and stable

Tags: fixed -1 1.21.21 On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 12:05:47 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Source: dpkg > Version: 1.21.22 > Severity: normal > User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: loong64 > X-Debbugs-Cc: zhangjial...@loongson.cn,zhangdan...@loongson.cn > In order to be able to ad

Bug#1041731: groff-base: "-" mapped as HYPHEN

Hi! [ CCed Russ for the pod2man side of this. ] On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 14:18:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I'm marking this important, and am tempted to raise it to serious... > > The problem at stake is that we have already a hard time making > newcomers read manpages. If they can't even tr

Bug#970234: consider dropping "No hard links in source packages"

Hi! On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 19:20:00 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: > > The fact that this has gone unnoticed in a source package in an existing > > release makes a pretty strong argument that nothing in Debian cares and > > we should just remove the constraint. > > Here is a pa

Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads

Hi! On Sun, 2023-09-10 at 16:31:30 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Guillem Jover writes: > > Hmm, the "For this case" comes just after the "no binary packages" which > > to me reads as being somewhat referring to it, perhaps the "no binary > > pack

Bug#963524: debian-policy: Binary and Description fields not mandatory in .changes on source-only uploads

Hi! On Sun, 2023-09-10 at 10:30:41 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > index 4bab7df..904fa52 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > @@ -812,10 +812,11 @@ See :ref:`s-descriptions` for furth

Bug#1051209: dpkg-dev: dpkg-source --commit should use configured default editor instead of forcing nano

Hi! On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 15:43:02 +0200, Axel Kittenberger wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.22.0 > Severity: normal >* What led up to the situation? > > using: dpkg-source --commit > >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > >

Bug#1051189: intel-opencl-icd: Uninstallable since intel-graphics-compiler 1.0.14896.8-1 upload

Package: intel-opencl-icd Version: 22.43.24595.41-1 Severity: serious Hi! This package has become uninstallable since the upload of the source package intel-graphics-compiler 1.0.14896.8-1: ,--- $ apt install intel-opencl-icd Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done

Bug#1051085: dpkg: dpkg-db-backup.timer stopped after upgrades

Hi! On Sat, 2023-09-02 at 16:43:57 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.22.0 > Severity: normal > Upgrading dpkg stops the dpkg-db-backup.timer, which seems rather > undesirable, as it the timer remains inactive until the next reboot or > until it is started manually: […] Ah!

Bug#1021292: Enabling branch protection on amd64 and arm64

Hi! On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 12:51:53 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 16:09:40 +0100, Wookey wrote: > > OK. We're all agreed on that then. Guillem can stick it in the next > > dpkg upload. So this happened, and Johannes reported that this seems to be bre

Bug#918914: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie

Hi! On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 23:25:23 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Following the procedure to modify default dpkg-buildflags I propose to > enable -fstack-clash-protection on amd64. The bug for dpkg tracking this > is #918914. > > | -fstack-clash-protection > | Generate code to prevent stack cl

Bug#1021292: Enabling branch protection on amd64 and arm64

Hi! On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 16:09:40 +0100, Wookey wrote: > On 2023-06-27 16:58 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Am Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:41:36PM +0200 schrieb Emanuele Rocca: > > > On 2022-10-26 08:20, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > I think this should rather be applied early after the Bookw

Bug#1050482: cron: Multiple issues with the cron_now feature

Source: cron Source-Version: 3.0pl1-173 Severity: normal Hi! While reading the changelog [C] during an upgrade I noticed a suspicious entry, and when I went checking to confirm it noticed multiple issues with the cron_now feature: * There's a hardcoded libselinux1 dependency in the binary stan

Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

Hi! On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 08:07:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > FWIW, I have been maintaining vagrant in Debian for several years. BTW, thank you for having done that, it's been much appreciated! > TL;DR: I will not be maintaining vagrant anymore. > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 02:56:28PM +0900,

Bug#1050332: bullseye-pu: package inetutils/2:2.0-1+deb11u2

-2.0/debian/changelog 2023-08-23 12:05:48.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +inetutils (2:2.0-1+deb11u2) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Add patch from upstream to check return values for set*id() functions. +Fixes CVE-2023-40303. (Closes: #1049365) + + -- Guillem Jover Wed, 23 Aug 2023 12

Bug#1050331: bookworm-pu: package inetutils/2:2.4-2+deb12u1

-2.4/debian/changelog 2023-08-23 12:01:39.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +inetutils (2:2.4-2+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Add patch from upstream to check return values for set*id() functions. +Fixes CVE-2023-40303. (Closes: #1049365) + + -- Guillem Jover Wed, 23 Aug 2023 12

Bug#1049365: inetutils: CVE-2023-40303

Hi! On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 20:42:10 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: inetutils > Version: 2:2.4-2 > Severity: important > Tags: security upstream > X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team > > The following vulnerability was published for inetutils. > > CVE-2023-40303[0

Bug#1043118: victoriametrics: FTBFS: test failure

Hi! On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 14:59:45 +0300, Denys Holius wrote: > The latest version of VictoriaMetrics v1.92.0 > should be marked as > LTS but it has some backwards-incompatible changes. Meanwhile v1.87.6 >

Bug#1043298: Package dependenciens mishmash

Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible Hi! On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 18:28:57 +, Mcgiwer wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.22 (amd64) > There seem to be problem with the packages dependencies. If there is a problem with package dependencies, then that should probably be assigned to the sp

Bug#1043043: UDD patches: marks Forwarded as invalid if not 'no', 'not-needed', 'yes' or URL

Hi! On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 23:35:27 -0300, David da Silva Polverari wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: udd > When using https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi, I notice that whenever > the Forwarded field contains anything other tha

Bug#1042931: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -P option does not work

Hi! On Thu, 2023-08-03 at 03:29:54 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.21.22 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de > > I tried to use build profiles for the first time today, and after > running into trouble with pbuilder I tried to run it manually and > fou

Bug#1041730: dpkg: Systemd dpkg-db-backup.timer unit should be "Persistent=true"

Hi! On Sat, 2023-07-22 at 19:36:46 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.22 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > X-Debbugs-Cc: tliko...@iki.fi > Dpkg installs systemd timer unit dpkg-db-backup.timer which is supposed > to run daily: > > # /lib/systemd/system/dpkg-db-backup

Bug#1041210: dpkg: vendor information should be read from /usr, not from /etc/dpkg/origins/

Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev Control: retitle -1 dpkg-vendor: Support reading vendor info from /usr Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: block -1 by 695781 On Sat, 2023-07-15 at 19:42:25 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.22 > Usertags: conffiles-reduction > current

Bug#951200: base-files: unable to upgrade, conffile error

Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible Hi! On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 11:31:35 +, Luca Koroll wrote: > Package: base-files > Version: 9.9+deb9u11 > Severity: important > after rebooting my system and trying to update my packages an error with > the base-files package occured which brought me in

Bug#606825: mingw triplets/ostable

Hi! Just noticed this change to the GNU config project which I wanted to add a reference here: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/commit/?id=91f6a7f616b161c25ba2001861a40e662e18c4ad Thanks, Guillem

Bug#982456: lintian: systemd SystemCallArchitectures directive incompatible with M-A:foreign

Hi! On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:18:31 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:42:59PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > The systemd unit file directive SystemCallArchitectures is > > incompatible with Multi-Arch:foreign markings in

Bug#1037136: dpkg-buildflags: 64-bit time_t by default

Hi! On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 14:24:02 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 03:56:28AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 21:18:10 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Package: dpkg-dev > > > Version: 1.21.22 > > &g

Bug#986357: Please improve package description

Hi! On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 03:58:34 +, peter green wrote: > As far as the current description goes, I think it's generally not > too bad but I think there are some minor improvements that could be > made. […] > * I feel it lacks a bit in "big picture", I *think* sqv is the main > command lin

Bug#1030149: dpkg: Fix dpkg handling of read-only filesystems/directories when they are --path-exclude'd

the common case. Thanks, Guillem From 0689b5b4a144d9d7c2171a12f6ff84da63a61892 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 23:49:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] dpkg: Handle non-existent .dpkg-tmp files on read-only filesystems On read-only filesystems trying to rename a direct

Bug#1040062: dpkg-dev: Please drop pie-{compile,link}.spec

Hi! On Sun, 2023-07-02 at 00:02:46 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.21.22 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-al...@lists.debian.org, debian-i...@lists.debian.org > Since stretch all release architectures are using PIE by default, > and all future release architect

Bug#1038891: libdpkg-perl: unrecognized hardcoded CC flags in scripts/Dpkg/Vendor/Debian.pm

Hi! On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 01:02:30 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 19:46:11 +0300, VSYakovetsky wrote: > > Package: libdpkg-perl > > Version: 1.21.22ubuntu1 > > Severity: minor > > X-Debbugs-Cc: vsyakovet...@gmail.com > >* What exactl

Bug#1038888: dpkg-buildpackage(1): mention all supported flags for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

Hi! On Thu, 2023-06-29 at 19:32:04 +0200, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > even though it's not 100% of what I expected this LGTM. What would you think > about retaining the link to the Debian Policy? Yeah, as I mentioned that would be backwards, and while I can recognize it might seem inconvenient, I'd

Bug#1038789: Enable capabilities feature

Hi! On Wed, 2023-06-28 at 10:02:55 +0200, Dennis Camera wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 01:57:27 +0200 > Guillem Jover wrote: > > Some time ago I asked on d-d whether anyone would have an issue with > > dpkg.deb in Debian linking against libcap [D]. And where I had worked &g

Bug#1033671: MD5File() goes into an unconditional infinite loop on bullseye

Hi! On Fri, 2023-03-31 at 13:43:03 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Control: fixed -1 0.11.4-1 > Control: severity -1 serious > > On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 20:51:07 +0200, Guillaume Morin wrote: > > Package: libbsd0 > > Version: 0.11.3-1 > > Tags: patch,upstream,fixed-up

Bug#1039863: DDPO: Add markers for toolchain and key packages

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi! During the freeze it's important to know which packages are part of the toolchain and key package sets, and as those definitions are under the purview of the release-team, so it might not always be immediately obvious to the package maintainers whethe

Bug#1039864: tracker.debian.org: Add markers for toolchain and key packages

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi! During the freeze it's important to know which packages are part of the toolchain and key package sets, and as those definitions are under the purview of the release-team, so it might not always be immediately obvious to the package maintainers w

Bug#1038789: Enable capabilities feature

Hi! On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:20:35 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > Many thanks for this suggestion. I appreciate the advantages of > capabilities support. > Openrc also has optional capabilities support in supervise-daemon which might > be > an advantage to users, but isn't used by default in Debia

Bug#1038891: libdpkg-perl: unrecognized hardcoded CC flags in scripts/Dpkg/Vendor/Debian.pm

Hi! On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 19:46:11 +0300, VSYakovetsky wrote: > Package: libdpkg-perl > Version: 1.21.22ubuntu1 > Severity: minor > X-Debbugs-Cc: vsyakovet...@gmail.com >* What led up to the situation? > - building deb package with dpkg-buildpackage and clang > - hardcoded -ffat-lto

Bug#1038888: dpkg-buildpackage(1): mention all supported flags for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

he dpkg behavior and not the other way around. So perhaps something along the lines like the attachment instead, while probably not what you were looking for, is something that feels acceptable for inclusion. Thanks, Guillem From dbbb968d8e92f816de9538653ee70d19b08a3681 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gui

Bug#1039621: libngs-jni: Installs shared object in wrong directory

Package: libngs-jni Version: 3.0.3+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Hi This package installs the shared object in the following _literal_ pathname: /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/jni/libncbi-ngs.so Where the variable has not been expanded and appears as is. So the shared object will not be found. Th

Bug#918914: add -fstack-clash-protection to default buildflags

Hi! On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:57:41 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Am Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:48:05AM +0200 schrieb Guillem Jover: > > I don't think the issues presented by Florian were ever resolved, so > > my concerns in https://bugs.debian.org/918914#15 would still ap

Bug#826608: hfsprogs: Please switch to use libmd instead of OpenSSL's libcrypto

Hi! On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 21:59:45 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Apologies for the late reply! No problem at all! > On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 23:15 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > [ Sorry had not seen the reply until now when I was doing a pass > > over submitted bug

Bug#1038761: startx.1: a few remarks and editing fixes for the manual

Control: reassign -1 xinit Hi! [ It seems this got misfiled, leaving the bulk of the mail for context. ] On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 00:30:04 +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.22 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > here are a few notes and fixes

Bug#1038121: tracker.debian.org: debian/patches check vs. single-debian-patch in debian/source/local-options

s with something parseable appended «, » or similar. In any case I think I'll add this to my list of things to revisit in the patch tagging guidelines for when I start that discussion. For now I've queued the attached patch. Thanks, Guillem From a4f63404cd0e6deb8e771bd5ebf9bc52b398e8d5 Mon S

Bug#1037946: mmdebstrap: Create /var/lib/dpkg/available for Debian releases <=buster

Hi! On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 19:09:35 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Michael Prokop (2023-06-14 17:19:37) > > since version 1.20.0, dpkg no longer creates /var/lib/dpkg/available (see > > #647911). > > I see that the bug talks about 1.20.0 but I've had code creating > /var/

Bug#1032911: More info

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 11:31:54 +0800, beks...@westnet.com.au wrote: > I've found some info on the previous bug about this problem. > > The previous bug in Debian 11 was 993154, submitted about 28 August > 2021. Yes, last time the conclusion was that a faulty USB drive w

Bug#1033187: dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage bissect will be helpful for regression testing

Control: severity -1 wishlist On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 08:14:08 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.21.21 > Severity: minor > Do not know if it is the right place but a dpkg-buildpackage bissection tool > that will allow to bissect the debian/patches queue will be helpfu

Bug#1034710: dpkg-gensymbols: Add higher check level for unnecessary entries in symbols file

Hi! On Sat, 2023-04-22 at 12:07:07 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.21.21 > Severity: wishlist > > When building libvirt, dpkg-gensymbols currently produces the > following output: > > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libvirt0/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match > comp

Bug#1035486: dpkg: consider making FS_IOC_FIEMAP an option that cna be turned off

Hi! [ Leaving most mail context for Colin (in CC). ] On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 01:47:27 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 06:16:52 +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > Package: dpkg > > Version: 1.20.12 > > Severity: wishlist > > > on many of my systems

Bug#1037136: dpkg-buildflags: 64-bit time_t by default

Hi! On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 21:18:10 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.21.22 > Tags: patch > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu mantic patch > The discussion on debian-devel around 64-bit time_t has died down, so I > figure it's time to propose

Bug#1036865: dpkg-dev: Overreaching Rules-Requires-Root namespace check

Hi! On Sun, 2023-05-28 at 10:26:46 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.22 > Severity: minor > X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net > I was playing around with doing a custom name space for Rules-Requires-Root, > and then dpkg said it owned the namespace: > > ``` > $ grep Rules

Bug#389591: ITP: freeswitch -- Modular Media Switching Software Library and Soft-Switch Application

Hi! I did a superficial license review for the upstream code and noticed multiple issues, for which I've filed a bug report upstream. As it is this does not look like it could be distributed in Debian. https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/issues/2092 Thanks, Guillem

Bug#994120: dpkg: please provide multiarch tuple to maintainer scripts

Hi! On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 10:27:15 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.20.9 > Severity: wishlist > Packages that have a plugin architecture, like glib2.0 and gdk-pixbuf, > often want to know the multiarch tuple in their maintainer scripts so > that they can enumerate plugins

Bug#1035486: dpkg: consider making FS_IOC_FIEMAP an option that cna be turned off

ould need to be benchmarked on a bunch of different filesystems and types of disks to see whether there would be significant performance degradation/regression. Thanks, Guillem From b93783b16b75eea334d82221cf5a71af5ba1ff99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 01:26:15

Bug#1035911: [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.22

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi! On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 04:24:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo Oops, missed the «-», but then that seems fine :), as earlier today I noticed that a triggered autopkgtest for another package had failed, so retriggered it as it looked lik

Bug#1035911: [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.22

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi! On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 23:44:29 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed > > On 2023-05-11 04:45:47 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.deb

Bug#1035911: [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.22

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg Hi! Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.22 upload. [ Reason ] I got a report for a segfault privately (as the reporter w

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

Hi! On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 10:12:01 +0800, Bo YU wrote: > If you talk about the baseline ABI according to hardware, yeah, this > is still open. > Thanks for more background here. I thought this might lead to a wider > discussion before solid ABI as pabs' suggestion. Given the ongoing discussion,

Bug#1035733: debian -policy: packages must not use dpkg-divert to override default systemd configuraton files

On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 08:48:49 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > […] I suspect Policy should say something stronger and more general, > namely that no package in Debian should divert a file from another package > unless this is arranged cooperatively between the packages to solve some > specific (unusua

Bug#1035709: unblock: pci.ids/0.0~2023.04.11-1

ncy=medium + + * New upstream release. +- Remove patch, fixed upstream. + + -- Guillem Jover Sun, 07 May 2023 02:10:00 +0200 + pci.ids (0.0~2023.03.17-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. diff -Nru pci.ids-0.0~2023.03.17/debian/patches/0001-Fix-encoding-issues.patch p

Bug#1035683: bullseye-pu: package libbsd/0.11.3-1+deb11u1

libbsd-0.11.3/debian/changelog 2023-05-07 19:13:23.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libbsd (0.11.3-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Fix infinite loop when using MD5File() symbol due to missing symbol +redirection. Thanks to Guillaume Morin . +Closes: #1033671 + + -- Guillem Jov

Bug#1034756: dpkg: please add support for riscv32

ase, to make adding such port possible in the near future.) Thanks, Guillem From d71a98c23c43a06650e90480e864c0e3da344437 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bo YU Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:50:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] arch: Add support for riscv32 CPU [guil...@debian.org: - Adapt the test suite. - Add ABI checking support. ] Close

Bug#1034439: attr: attr -R forces uses "trusted" and "xfsroot" prefixes instead of actual root

Hi! On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 13:43:01 +0200, наб wrote: > Package: attr > Version: 1:2.5.1-4 > Severity: normal > I would like to inspect the value of the system.posix_acl_access xattr. > However, no matter which parameter I pass, I always get a forced prefix: > -- >8 -- > # strace attr -g system.po

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >