worried about a GC failure on
> its own.
Thank you for this analysis. It would seem that disabling the test is
an acceptable workaround.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Fri 26 Aug 2022 at 01:33AM +01, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 16:26:21 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> On Thu 25 Aug 2022 at 08:50PM +01, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> > clutter-1.0 is unmaintained upstream (#996690), but has too many
>> >
Hello,
On Wed 24 Aug 2022 at 10:57PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1017725: dgit-maint-native(7) examples should use
> push-source (rather than push)"):
>> On Fri 19 Aug 2022 at 05:12PM +02, Philip Hands wrote:
>> > It strikes me
ed Rust code, then there is source code missing.
I have not looked into the package to see whether this is actually the
case.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
viewing the package in NEW, it sounds
like this package is okay.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sun 21 Aug 2022 at 02:55PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org, barlow@gmail.com
> Control: affects -1 src:pikepdf
>
> I request an adoptor for the pikepdf package. It would be better i
either replace
me in Uploaders:, or alternatively take the package out of the team's
hands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, but
using the x11-xfixes extension. It has fewer bugs when used with
modern applications and window managers.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-maintained package, so the adoptor should either replace
me in Uploaders:, or alternatively take the package out of the team's
hands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it.
This is a team-maintained package, so the adoptor should either replace
me in Uploaders:, or alternatively take the package out of the team's
hands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it restricts itself to formatting only
some parts of the Haskell code piped to it, such as import
statements.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
o file a Launchpad bug gathering the various links
together.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ation than existing Python PDF tools
* IPython notebook and Jupyter integration
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
and continuous
integration.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
er all, these packages are
> coded for their consumption, and we should do what makes their work
> easier.
I don't believe any of our scripts for removals care about usertags,
just bug subjects, so it seems fine to trust the existing tags the BTS
knows about, as demonstrated by Paul's rsync commands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
` and
> gently transition to defaulting to doing source-only uploads unless
> one specified that option via config or options.
This is an intriguing suggestion, thank you.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
: Python
Description : Sphinx extension for designing view size-responsive web
components
The latest upstream version of pikepdf, primarily maintained by me,
requires this library for its docs build. I'd therefore be very
grateful if someone on the Python team would package it.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Wed 10 Aug 2022 at 01:00PM +02, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 20:42:15 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> On Wed 10 Aug 2022 at 01:53AM +02, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>
>> > Package: ftp.debian.org
>> > Severity: wishlist
>&g
out the oldlibs for the
transitional packages if you're planning to remove them the very next
release cycle -- normally we don't bother changing overrides for that.
--
Sean Whitton
that you
can work with our git repo directly.)
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
t; mime-support directly. Your help is welcome.
I don't think we normally bother changing the overrides for transitional
packages since they are eligible for removal the very next release
cycle. Is there something different for this case?
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> priority violate Policy’s requirement of not depending on packages with
> a lower priority.
I thought we systematically altered everything extra->optional in dak.
Anyway, have run 'dak override' for this now.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e history of this -- what happened to mean that it stopped
being installed by default when it used to be?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gh I note that it was in 'misc' not 'lisp' before.
> A section change would be very much appreciated :-) Also, please let
> me know if the use of reportbug's "override" submenu for
> ftp.debian.org bugs was appropriate when filing this bug.
Yup.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t; No objections from the d-i side, sorry if that blocked the issue. :/
That wasn't it, we would have asked.
These bugs have a higher status in my MUA than they used to so hopefully
this won't happen again.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a 32-bit address space can
accommodate?
Also asked about here: <https://github.com/sharplispers/ironclad/issues/53>.
Would be grateful for any input. Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Tue 09 Aug 2022 at 07:46AM +02, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On 09-08-2022 05:08, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> It looks like Lisp just ran out of memory.
>
> Yes, but it does so systematically.
>
>> Indeed, I can't see this
>> failure on debci.deb
* = true
> fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 1357:
> Heap exhausted, game over.
It looks like Lisp just ran out of memory. Indeed, I can't see this
failure on debci.debian.org at present, which makes sense if it's a
random OOM problem on weaker architectures like armhf -- so, not the
fa
ty sure will work -- thank you.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
helpful if you were to follow our
naming conventions.[1] The source package name of "howm" is correct,
but the binary package should be "elpa-howm".
Thanks.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianEmacsenTeam#Addons_packaging_policy
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
be great if howm could be updated before then.
Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
valid. So it looks like the fix for #902943 has
broken this sort of use case. It would be great to have some way to
cause the PARTUUID to be passed through unchanged.
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
g the problem, if you like.
The dpkg-source command creates emacs_28.1+1-1.dsc when I run it myself
from .git/dgit/unpack, so it's not obvious why it's not there when dgit
tries to move it. But I have not yet dug very deep.
--
Sean Whitton
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: org-make-toc
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Adam Porter
* URL : https://github.com/alphapapa/org-make-toc
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: taxy-magit-section-el
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Adam Porter
* URL : https://github.com/alphapapa/taxy.el branch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: emacs-svg-lib
Version : 0.2.5
Upstream Author : Nicolas P. Rougier
* URL : https://github.com/rougier/svg-lib
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: taxy-el
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Adam Porter
* URL : https://github.com/alphapapa/taxy.el
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: plz-el
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Adam Porter
* URL : https://github.com/alphapapa/plz.el
* License : GPL-3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ement-el
Version : 0~git...
Upstream Author : Adam Porter
* URL : https://github.com/alphapapa/ement.el
* License
better not to have elisp-slime-nav in bookworm. Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Sat 18 Jun 2022 at 10:37AM +02, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 14.06.22 um 21:59 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 14.06.22 um 21:50 schrieb Sean Whitton:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Tue 14 Jun 2022 at 09:39PM +02, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>
>>>
format MBF.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Mon 20 Jun 2022 at 05:31PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> BEGIN BALLOT
>
> Using its powers under constitution 6.1.5, the Technical Committee
> issues the following advice:
>
> 1. It is not a bug of any severity for a package with a non-native
> version number t
and 5
Option X -- issue only items 1, 2, 3 and 5
Option N -- none of the above.
END BALLOT
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I don't understand -- why would it be irrelevant?
--
Sean Whitton
eed their git repos on salsa. Not all of
them, but very many.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
end the ballot as sent by Sean on
> June 7th.
>
> Thanks for bearing with me and bringing those arguments forward.
Cool, thanks for reviewing and confirming that.
--
Sean Whitton
ing the remaining packages when there's no reason to stay with
> 1.0, using the NMU procedure if needed.
I agree that this would be a good outcome, as expressed by your option 4c.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Tue 14 Jun 2022 at 09:39PM +02, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Sean
>
> Am 13.06.22 um 03:14 schrieb Sean Whitton:
>> Thanks for the patch. I take it you got the sbcl.conf from the
>> binfmt-conf package? So systemd-binfmt means that these config files
>> ge
nstalled.
Thanks for the patch. I take it you got the sbcl.conf from the
binfmt-conf package? So systemd-binfmt means that these config files
get stored in packages rather than all stored in binfmt-conf?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
utting back on features and workflows. But I
certainly agree that it would be better to have a better solution, like
Ian's sketch.
I think Ian has already suggested adding text to our resolution
recommending the development of such a source format. To be honest I
don't think it's really necessary as everyone agrees it would be better
to have it, but if you think it should be said explicitly then let's do
that.
--
Sean Whitton
s not inherent to all of the workflows we are discussing here,
just one of them. Indeed, this is one of the primary motivations for
one of the others.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Tue 10 May 2022 at 05:29pm -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> At today's ctte meeting we considered whether we can start a vote on
> this, but two committee members were missing, and someone else at the
> meeting reported that they hadn't yet been able to spend enough time
> thin
be a good ballot option to include, thank you.
--
Sean Whitton
solution text for a bug that's probably
been open too long already.
--
Sean Whitton
jects.
Right, hence why we want 'dgit clone' to be as useful as possible.
--
Sean Whitton
d in itself, it would be good to have more concrete reasons for
wanting uniformity in this case documented in this bug (not necessarily
in the resolution text) before we add it to the ballot.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello Jameson,
On Mon 16 May 2022 at 12:33PM -07, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Here's a new version of the patch addressing Sean's comments.
I need it signed off; please see CONTRIBUTING.rst.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon 16 May 2022 at 09:13am -07, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, May 11 2022, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Hello Jameson,
>>
>> On Tue 12 Apr 2022 at 03:17PM -07, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
>>
>>> Package: mailscripts
>>> Version:
ge is also
> included.
Cool, I'd like to add this. Just two questions
- what license are you releasing it under? please add the usual
copyright and license headers and update d/copyright
- how about renaming --id to --notmuch-id or --notmuch-message-id ?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
est practice. I think that they are a practice that is worth exploring
> and experimenting on, but not yet widely adopted nor understood. But I
> would be happy to be proven wrong (especially of based on facts).
I would say that we don't have a consensus on either.
--
Sean Whitton
sig
,
including, but not limited to, git-first packaging workflows.
5. We decline to comment on the recent source package format MBF.
Option A -- issue items 1--5
Option B -- issue items 1, 2, 3 and 5, but not 4
Option N -- none of the above.
END DRAFT
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Hello,
On Tue 03 May 2022 at 12:13PM -04, Joey Hess wrote:
> Fixed with attached patch.
Cool, thanks. Seems like there might be a release soon so I'll hold off
patching Debian's version?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> that way as follows:
>
> git-annex enableremote foo shellescape=no
Thanks for looking into it. Do you see this as a workaround or what
people using newer rsync should use going forward?
--
Sean Whitton
tuck since I need to finally learn dgit and apparently
> git-debrebase. I'll start with the manpages.
dgit-maint-debrebase(7) should be in a "How do I ..." format; let me
know if there are parts that are unclear.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
in a binary package
> built from src:util-linux. If this package Conflicts with the rename
> package, then it must not contain any other binaries.
> ===End Resolution B
>
> ===Begin Resolution N
> None of the above
> ===End Resolution N
I vote
A > B > N
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Fri 15 Apr 2022 at 01:14PM -07, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> In this case I believe you need to formally withdraw options A and
>> then propose another ballot.
>
> Minor procedural point: the person proposing the options can also freely
>
und on
> https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
It's a regression in Ghostscript.
OCRmyPDF has made a release including a workaround but the test suite
for that fails, so I can't upload it yet. But in any case this bug is
not one in OCRmyPDF.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
my first TC resolution, please be gentle if I have the procedure wrong!
Thank you for coming up with this text. Actually, the new procedure is
new to all of us; this is our first use of it.
In this case I believe you need to formally withdraw options A and
then propose another ballot.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
vatives. I can't speak for everyone, but I
suspect that we would not consider this NMU to be in line with our
existing decisions.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Sat 09 Apr 2022 at 11:50am +02, Ansgar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared a patch for the current issue. See the attached proposed
> NMU diff. I've limited it to minimal changes.
I don't understand. The warning is already no longer emitted on Debian?
--
Sean Whitton
known.
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2022/04/msg7.html
Thanks for the link.
--
Sean Whitton
t at some point it will be
appropriate for the ctte to propose, but not one with the same text as
one of our merged-/usr decisions already issued -- that doesn't make
much constitutional sense, I think.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Tue 29 Mar 2022 at 09:06PM +02, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/03/22 at 16:21 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it's the preferred method. I believe most of the project
>> sees git histories are the preferred tool for achieving the goal you
>>
r/bin/rename-from-perl at the same time.
Indeed, and doesn't it violate Policy 10.1, which says "Two different
packages must not install programs with different functionality but with
the same filenames" ? Perhaps it's an edge case.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
the previous release cycle, I have split the mime-support into the
> media-types and the mailcap packages.
>
> The patch below updates the Policy to reflect that.
This is technically a normative change but since the change has already
been made in the archive, I've just gone ahead and a
dgit.
Repositories for packages contain both upstream history and Debian
packaging history, and we have powerful git subcommands for extracting
information. In many cases there is a good argument to be made that the
git history is part of the preferred form of modification.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e it as well. Putting aside the postinst warning, the I
can't see anything the TC could do beyond what we've already done, until
there's a patch on the table. Thanks for the summary.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ntents supports. That
is indeed subjective just as you explain. There exists disagreement
about whether the Ubuntu approach to implementing merged-/usr is adequate.
The difficulty is that Guillem's warning kind of refers to both.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Wed 16 Mar 2022 at 04:36PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hmm... I don't see how it could have worked before. Does this fix it:
>
>> diff --git a/notmuch-slurp-debbug b/notmuch-slurp-debbug
>> index ad0db47..1568d9c 100755
>> --- a/notmuch-slurp-debbug
>&
Hello,
On Thu 17 Mar 2022 at 06:18PM -04, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Sean, thanks for the prompt response.
>
> On Thu 2022-03-17 11:34:32 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> On Thu 17 Mar 2022 at 01:51PM -04, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> For backward compatibility, if a
control: retitle -1 O: emacs-helm-ag
Hello,
On Wed 22 Jul 2020 at 07:34AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I request an adoptor for the emacs-helm-ag package. I haven't been
> using it myself for a while.
>
> This is a team-maintained package, so the adoptor should either replace
>
control: retitle -1 O: clojure-mode
Hello,
On Sat 29 Feb 2020 at 08:30AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request an adoptor for the clojure-mode package.
>
> This is a team-maintained package, so the adoptor should either replace
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-hask...@lists.debian.org
Please drop hothasktags from sid. It has been unbuildable for more than
a year and no-one seems sufficiently interested in the package.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: retitle -1 O: projectile
Hello,
On Sun 02 Jan 2022 at 04:12PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I request an adoptor for the projectile package. I haven't used it for
> some time, as I'm now using the built-in package.el for everything for
> which I used to use projectile.
>
>
wrong with it; no need for an RM or anything.
This is a team-maintained package, so the adoptor should either replace
me in Uploaders:, or alternatively take the package out of the team's
hands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
common UI widgets such as popup tooltips and popup menus.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: retitle -1 O: debpaste-el
Hello,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 01:46PM +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I request an adoptor for the debpaste-el package.
>
> This package is no longer in my ~/.emacs.d/init.el and it would be
> better if someone who actually uses the packa
control: retitle -1 O: cycle-quotes
Hello,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 01:42PM +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I request an adoptor for the cycle-quotes package.
>
> This package is no longer in my ~/.emacs.d/init.el and it would be
> better if someone who actually uses the packa
control: retitle -1 O: deft
Hello,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 01:43PM +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request an adoptor for the deft package.
>
> This package is no longer in my ~/.emacs.d/init.el and it would be
> better if someone who actu
control: retitle -1 O: xml-rpc-el
Hello,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 01:45PM +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request an adoptor for the xml-rpc-el package.
>
> This is a reverse-dependency for another package for which I am
> requesting an
control: retitle -1 O: pointback
Hello,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 01:30PM +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request an adoptor for the pointback package.
>
> This package is no longer in my ~/.emacs.d/init.el and it would be
> better if some
with it; no need for an RM or anything.
This is a team-maintained package, so the adoptor should either replace
me in Uploaders:, or alternatively take the package out of the team's
hands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lt
colors are intentionally subtle; they are unobtrusive enough to make
the mode worth looking at even if you usually don't like rainbow
parentheses modes. A number of major color themes such as Zenburn and
Solarized have added their own faces for the mode.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Descri
wrong with it; no need for an RM or anything.
This is a team-maintained package, so the adoptor should either replace
me in Uploaders:, or alternatively take the package out of the team's
hands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
wrong with it; no need for an RM or anything.
This is a team-maintained package, so the adoptor should either replace
me in Uploaders:, or alternatively take the package out of the team's
hands.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: retitle -1 O: emacs-world-time-mode
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 01:41PM +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I request an adoptor for the emacs-world-time-mode package.
>
> This package is no longer in my ~/.emacs.d/init.el and it would be
> better if someone who actually uses the packa
Hello,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 01:47PM +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request an adopter for the paredit-everywhere package.
>
> This package is no longer in my ~/.emacs.d/init.el and it would be
> better if someone who actually uses
control: retitle -1 O: perspective-el
Hello,
On Tue 12 Jun 2018 at 10:13AM +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I request an adoptor for the perspective-el package.
>
> This package is no longer in my ~/.emacs.d/init.el and it would be
> better if someone who actually uses the packa
301 - 400 of 2912 matches
Mail list logo