Hi all,
On 14-07-2024 9:47 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the
workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
The host has been running fine so far, I have installed the current
unstable kernel on all arm64 hosts now.
Paul
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 09:47:52AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09-07-2024 12:23 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I'll see what I can do.
>
> For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the workers
> (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
Thanks a
Hi,
On 09-07-2024 12:23 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I'll see what I can do.
For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the
workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
Paul
[1]
https://ci.debian.net/munin/ci-worker-arm64-11/ci-worker-arm64-11/index.html
O
Hi,
On 08-07-2024 10:07 p.m., Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
If you think it worth enough knowing if either is the case, I can
install the backports kernel again on the arm64 hosts, but obviously
that will be annoying for us. Please let me know if I should pursue this
(I would be expecting a bit qu
Hi Paul,
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:58:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 08:09 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi Ben (and all the rest),
> >
> > On 15-05-2024 9:56 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Apologies for leaving this bug for so long.
> >
> > NP, part of live I guess.
On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 08:09 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Ben (and all the rest),
>
> On 15-05-2024 9:56 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Apologies for leaving this bug for so long.
>
> NP, part of live I guess.
>
> > Is this bug still occurring?
>
> I don't know. The problem was severe enough f
Hi Ben (and all the rest),
On 15-05-2024 9:56 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
Apologies for leaving this bug for so long.
NP, part of live I guess.
Is this bug still occurring?
I don't know. The problem was severe enough for us to abandon the idea
of running the backport kernels on our arm64 h
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 21:36:53 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hi Ben and the rest,
>
> On 04-12-2023 15:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> CPU: 6 PID: 15039 Comm: lxc-start Tainted: G D W L
> >> 6.5.0-0.deb12.1-arm64 #1 Debian 6.5.3-1~b
Hi,
On 2023-12-04 03:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The D and W flags mean there were prior BUG and WARN errors logged.
> Please send those as well.
Here is the very first warning:
Nov 30 17:16:45 ci-worker-armhf-03 kernel: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 1592 at
fs/dcache.c:365 dentry_free+0x98/0xd0
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Ben and the rest,
On 04-12-2023 15:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
CPU: 6 PID: 15039 Comm: lxc-start Tainted: G D WL
6.5.0-0.deb12.1-arm64 #1 Debian 6.5.3-1~bpo12+1
The D and W flags mean there were prior BUG and WARN errors logged.
Please send those as
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 6.5.3-1~bpo12+1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 2023-12-02 at 18:11 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Package: linux-image-6.5.0-0.deb12.1-arm64
> Version: 6.5.3-1~bpo12+1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: system stops responding
>
> Dear kernel maintainers,
>
> Thur
11 matches
Mail list logo
