Hi Brian,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:10:35AM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Well, the newer version *is* in the archive, as another maintainer took
> over packaging the new version (and I had intended for him to take over
> the old one but apparently that never happened). qwt4 should be removed
Hi
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 14:11:44 Andreas Tille wrote:
> the request for uploading a new upstream version is 2,5 years old and
> did not deserved a single response from the maintainer. While this is a
> wishlist bug it should be fixed anyway because other packages depend
> from newer versi
Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
the request for uploading a new upstream version is 2,5 years old and
did not deserved a single response from the maintainer. While this is a
wishlist bug it should be fixed anyway because other packages depend
from newer versions of this library.
Similar situation wit
Hi,
the request for uploading a new upstream version is 2,5 years old and
did not deserved a single response from the maintainer. While this is a
wishlist bug it should be fixed anyway because other packages depend
from newer versions of this library.
Similar situation with #350489 which is tagg
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the request for uploading a new upstream version is 2,5 years old and
> did not deserved a single response from the maintainer. While this is a
> wishlist bug it should be fixed anyway because other packages depend
> from newer versions of this library.
>
> Similar
5 matches
Mail list logo