#readahead-list (1:1.20060421.1016-5) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Allow to run in the background, see README.Debian (Closes: #481369)
#
package readahead-list readahead
tags 481369 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:49:18PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:53:33 +0100
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:53:33 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> Running it in the background would mean you were seeking the disk all
> over the shop,
On a solid state disk (CompactFlash, USB stick or otherwise), there is no
overhead due to seeking. For rotating disks the kernel uses an elevato
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 18:09 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.05.2008, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Alberto:
> > Since version 1:0.20050517.0220-0ubuntu4, readahead runs in the
> > foreground, not the background, in order to avoid i/o concurrency
> > (which is slow).
>
Not true. I
[Alberto]
> I send attached both graphs as you suggested
> [bootchartioniced.png (image/png, inline)]
> [bootchartnotioniced.png (image/png, inline)]
The graphs look strange. Are you sure the profiling worked as it
should? The readahead run do not seem to have loaded all the files
needed by the
Am Donnerstag, den 15.05.2008, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Alberto:
> package: readahead
> version: 1.20060421.1016-3
> severity: wishlist
>
>
> Since version 1:0.20050517.0220-0ubuntu4, readahead runs in the
> foreground, not the background, in order to avoid i/o concurrency
> (which is slow).
> A bette
package: readahead
version: 1.20060421.1016-3
severity: wishlist
Since version 1:0.20050517.0220-0ubuntu4, readahead runs in the
foreground, not the background, in order to avoid i/o concurrency
(which is slow).
A better approach: run with the ionice wrapper (not available at
time of 1:0.2005051
6 matches
Mail list logo