-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
package netatalk
tags 533141 pending
thanks
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 03:52:02PM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
>2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard
>> >> You've asked those patches before, and I told you not (as
>> >> upstream) to worry about those pathces to
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard
> >> You've asked those patches before, and I told you not (as upstream)
> >> to worry about those pathces to autogenerated files): I agree that
> >> they are not of concern for upstream.
> >
> >But you are *not* patching _generated_ files here. You are patching
> >confi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 01:58:37PM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
>2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
>> >2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard
>> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrot
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
> >2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard
> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
> >> >2009/6/16 Itai Seggev
> >> >> Any other suggestions?
> >> >
> >> >Although you're only reporting this prob
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
> >2009/6/16 Itai Seggev
> >> Any other suggestions?
> >
> >Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is
> >alread available, whatever causes your error may still be present.
> >Ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
>2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
>> >2009/6/16 Itai Seggev
>> >> Any other suggestions?
>> >
>> >Although you're only reporting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:31:44PM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:53:46AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Hi Itai,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:10:20AM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote:
>> >Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
>2009/6/16 Itai Seggev
>> Any other suggestions?
>
>Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is
>alread available, whatever causes your error may still be pre
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev
> Any other suggestions?
Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is
alread available, whatever causes your error may still be present.
Therefore I'm digging into this and will be talkin to the libtool
folks. Stay tuned.
-Frank, Netatalk Developer
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:53:46AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Itai,
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:10:20AM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote:
> >Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my
> >system, but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild
> >th
2009/6/15 Itai Seggev :
> Package: netatalk
> Version: 2.0.4~rc2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my
> system,
> but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild the package
> from
> source to enable openSSL.
Please re-r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Itai,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:10:20AM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote:
>Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my
>system, but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild
>the package from source to e
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my system,
but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild the package from
source to enable openSSL.
Going through the following
apt-get source netatal
13 matches
Mail list logo
