[2009-09-07 13:44] Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> > > Which is also correct, invoke-rc.d is to be used in maintainer scripts,
> > > its
> > > result codes in default mode of operation are optimized for that usage.
> >
> > Yeah, I know that. And that is okay. However if it does not start a
> > s
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:44:03PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Yeah, I know that. And that is okay. However if it does not start a
> > service (for whatever reason) it should say WHY. It does so for
>
> Well, I am not oposed to that at all, it would be useful to add a "verbose"
>
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> sorry.. what?! Why is invoke-rc.d not starting services in the default
> runlevel? Or did you want to bring this in relation to the above stated
> LSB header?
The script is listed as default-stop for runlevel 2. That means it is not
to be started i
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:41:18PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > > [Patrick Schoenfeld]
> > > > recently I stumbled across some behaviour in invoke-rc.d whi
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Patrick Schoenfeld]
> > > recently I stumbled across some behaviour in invoke-rc.d which I
> > > consider somehow broken. When trying to start a service with
> > > invoke-rc.d
5 matches
Mail list logo