2011/7/14 Petr Salinger :
>> I also wonder if we should hunt down the other Linux-specific ELF
>> notes in that file.
>
> I would say we should ignore all Linux-specific ELF notes.
Yes, but that makes the patch more intrusive, increasing the
maintenance cost. Is it worth it?
> Or in our glibc-po
It looks like a collision, namely between
AT_STACKPROT x AT_SECURE
Here's a possible patch to fix this. I haven't tested it yet. Does
this look like the right approach?
I also wonder if we should hunt down the other Linux-specific ELF
notes in that file.
I would say we should ignore all Li
2011/7/14 Petr Salinger :
>
> It looks like a collision, namely between
>
> AT_STACKPROT x AT_SECURE
Good guess Petr, it is indeed AT_SECURE.
Here's a possible patch to fix this. I haven't tested it yet. Does
this look like the right approach?
I also wonder if we should hunt down the other Lin
As for LD_SHOW_AUXV=yes, I tried different combinations and it is
always ignored, no matter what.
Thanks for investigating. It might be related to elf notes supplied by
kernel.
FreeBSD 9 added these defines:
#define AT_CANARY 16 /* Canary for SSP. */
#define AT_C
2011/6/16 Robert Millan :
> $ fakeroot id -u
> ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
> preloaded: ignored.
> 1000
It seems that LD_* variables are selectively ignored by ld.so. The
command above results in:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/libfakeroot
LD_PRELOAD=libfa
Package: libc0.1
Version: 2.13-7
Severity: normal
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
$ fakeroot id -u
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
ignored.
1000
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT pol
6 matches
Mail list logo