On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:14:03PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Just a quick ping on this bug.
>
> Are vservers now working OK with the current ischroot implementation,
> or is further work needed here?
According to exhaustive testing by upgrading a single random vserver from
squeeze to unstable,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:27:16PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:11:12PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:04:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > CCing Clint and Aurelien: Does this type of check belong in
> > > "ischroot", or would it need adding to
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:11:12PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:04:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > CCing Clint and Aurelien: Does this type of check belong in
> > "ischroot", or would it need adding to a separate (e.g. "isvserver")
> > tool? Is the scope of ischroot li
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:04:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> CCing Clint and Aurelien: Does this type of check belong in
> "ischroot", or would it need adding to a separate (e.g. "isvserver")
> tool? Is the scope of ischroot limited to plain chroot(2) chroots,
Is the objective here to find out
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > What is the return value of isc
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:37:20PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:29:44PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:01:2
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:29:44PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:57:2
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > What is the return value of ischroot in the vserver (when run as
> > > root)?
> >
> > 2 (failure to d
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > What is the return value of ischroot in the vserver (when run as
> > root)?
>
> 2 (failure to detect)
Does /proc (/proc/1/root) exist inside the vserver? Is /proc
ava
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> What is the return value of ischroot in the vserver (when run as
> root)?
2 (failure to detect)
--
1KB // Yo momma uses IPv4!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:43:53PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:22:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > In containers like vserver, even root cannot mount things from the inside,
> > > for obvious securit
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:22:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > In containers like vserver, even root cannot mount things from the inside,
> > for obvious security reasons.
> IIRC we were explicitly supporting vserver in the postins
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:22:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> In containers like vserver, even root cannot mount things from the inside,
> for obvious security reasons.
>
> This makes the new postinst fail:
> dpkg: error processing initscripts (--configure):
> subprocess installed post-install
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-13.11
Severity: important
In containers like vserver, even root cannot mount things from the inside,
for obvious security reasons.
This makes the new postinst fail:
Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-13.11) ...
insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (empty
14 matches
Mail list logo