reassign 728743 libgl1-nvidia-glx
retitle corrupts the signal block mask (SigBlk) breaking unrelated
applications
severity critical
thanks
Small update, it really seems to be the OpenGL library from Nvidia
modyifing the sigprocmask (SigBlk in /proc/self/status) from this reports:
https://bugzilla.
Package: mono-gac
Version: 2.10.8.1-8
Followup-For: Bug #728743
Hi,
same problem here, the installation currently hangs while reporting this
bug.
Regards
alex
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Mirco Bauer wrote:
I know 2 persons on IRC which suffer from the same issue as you
(non-0 SigBlk) and it seems like there is a connection to the proprietary
nvidia graphics drivers.
I have found a report here [0] that says the issue shows up starting with
nvidia 331.20. Can
I know 2 persons on IRC which suffer from the same issue as you
(non-0 SigBlk) and it seems like there is a connection to the proprietary
nvidia graphics drivers.
I have found a report here [0] that says the issue shows up starting with
nvidia 331.20. Can you tell me what your nvidia version is?
W
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Peter Denison
wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> On 11/13/2013 04:44 PM, Mirco Bauer wrote:
>>
>>> Please run and paste the output of this command:
>>>
>>> grep SigBlk /proc/self/status
>>>
>>
>> Who are you asking to run this, Mirco? Yo
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 04:44 PM, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> > Please run and paste the output of this command:
> >
> > grep SigBlk /proc/self/status
>
> Who are you asking to run this, Mirco? You had me in the To: field, so
> i'm assuming you're aski
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 11/13/2013 04:44 PM, Mirco Bauer wrote:
Please run and paste the output of this command:
grep SigBlk /proc/self/status
Who are you asking to run this, Mirco? You had me in the To: field, so
i'm assuming you're asking me, but i've been unabl
On 11/13/2013 04:44 PM, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> Please run and paste the output of this command:
>
> grep SigBlk /proc/self/status
Who are you asking to run this, Mirco? You had me in the To: field, so
i'm assuming you're asking me, but i've been unable to replicate the
issue. fwiw, here's what i
Please run and paste the output of this command:
grep SigBlk /proc/self/status
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> Control: 728743 reassign mono-gac
> Control: 728743 affects libgmime2.6-cil
>
> On 11/11/2013 02:56 PM, Peter Denison wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Dan
Control: 728743 reassign mono-gac
Control: 728743 affects libgmime2.6-cil
On 11/11/2013 02:56 PM, Peter Denison wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> It's possible that you'll want to reassign this bug to either
>> mono-runtime (for /usr/bin/mono) or mono-4.0-gac (for
>> /us
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Control: tags 728743 + moreinfo unreproducible
On 11/04/2013 04:45 PM, Peter Denison wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrade of libgmime2.6-cil to 2.6.19-1
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (o
Control: tags 728743 + moreinfo unreproducible
On 11/04/2013 04:45 PM, Peter Denison wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>* What led up to the situation?
> Upgrade of libgmime2.6-cil to 2.6.19-1
>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
> apt-get -u upgrade
Package: libgmime2.6-cil
Version: 2.6.19-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrade of libgmime2.6-cil to 2.6.19-1
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
apt-get -u upgrade
* What was the outcome of this action?
apt
13 matches
Mail list logo