Mathias Gibbens wrote on 06/02/2022 at 03:38:03+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 29EEE2D6ECF442F9 created at
> 2022-02-06T03:38:03+0100 using RSA]]
> For those following this ITP, the end is in sight! I have whittled
> down the huge list of missing dependencies to just nine package
For those following this ITP, the end is in sight! I have whittled
down the huge list of missing dependencies to just nine packages, all
of which are ready for upload. They're just waiting on sponsorship
and/or other dependencies to make it through into unstable.
The packaging work for LXD is
Hi,
On 08/01/2021 05:07, peylight wrote:
> Hi Dear Debian Developers,
> Can you check the 331th message of LXD packaging please:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768073#311
>
Thanks for your interest in LXD packaging - and sorry for the late reply.
The issue with said packa
Hi Dear Debian Developers,
Can you check the 331th message of LXD packaging please:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768073#311
--
Best Regards,
peylight
Hello,
For the last few weeks I have been working on a Debian package for LXD
after switching to Debian from Fedora where the package was available. I
was targeting the stable release (buster). I added several workarounds
to create deb packages from upstream released Golang source code. The
e
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:59:17 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Hermann?=
wrote:
>
> That was indeed on the radar after discussions with upstream at FOSDEM
> and we were in the loop. Thanks for keeping the subscribers of this bug
> informed! (and sorry I didn't do it myself).
>
> And now, dqlite is actu
Hi,
On 27/09/2020 20:23, Kurt Kremitzki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With the release of LXD 4.6 [1], it should now be a lot easier for it to be
> brought to Debian:
>
> "Dqlite changes
>
> Shortly after LXD 4.5 was released, a major change was made to upstream
> dqlite.
>
> Rather than relying on ou
Hello,
With the release of LXD 4.6 [1], it should now be a lot easier for it to be
brought to Debian:
"Dqlite changes
Shortly after LXD 4.5 was released, a major change was made to upstream
dqlite.
Rather than relying on our fork of sqlite3 which was adding some hooks used to
intercept files
Its sad that Debian missed the train.
Regards
Harri
Hi,
First, sorry for the late reply. A mail filter caught this message
before I had the chance to read it.
On 14/12/2018 12:15, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> how good are chances to get LXD into Buster?
As much as it pains me to say so, not very good at the moment, with the
soft freeze c
Hi folks,
how good are chances to get LXD into Buster?
Regards
Harri
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 04:01:28PM +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
Nope, they said that _feature_ releases will be available as snap
packages, but LTS (3.0 for now, and may be other in the future) will
be supported as deb packages.
It's moot, anyway: Debian will be packaging the source and bui
Nope, they said that _feature_ releases will be available as snap
packages, but LTS (3.0 for now, and may be other in the future) will
be supported as deb packages.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Gerasiov
Contacts:
e-mail: g...@cs.msu.su WWW: http://gerasiov.net TG/Skype: gerasiov
PGP fingerpr
Seems like the LXD snap is the way to go.
From now on, non-security related updates to LXD on Ubuntu will no
longer be distributed through debs.
"""
LXD 3.1 will only be made available as a snap package. We will not be
uploading it as a deb to Ubuntu 18.10 or through backports to previous
releases
Hi folks,
I hope this is still alive. for a long time no response.
Greetings
Holger...
Hi folks,
is this ITP still alive?
Regards
Harri
On 24 September 2016 at 05:25, Anthony Fok wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> (with added Cc to the Debian Go Team as well as
>
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:52:15 +0100 Jonathan Dowland
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think that an ITP that has been inactive this long could be taken over
> by
> > another interested
Ohai,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:25:15AM -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> > I think that an ITP that has been inactive this long could be taken over by
> > another interested party without it being a hijack, all things considered.
> > (I think some QA script might move it to RFP soon anyway).
> >
> > A
Hello all!
(with added Cc to the Debian Go Team as well as
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:52:15 +0100 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that an ITP that has been inactive this long could be taken over by
> another interested party without it being a hijack, all things considered.
> (I think some
Hi Adnan,
It's been more than a month already since you've said that we should
"stay tuned". Well, I can't hold my breath anymore... :)
Is there any update on the release of this package? Is there a temporary
Git repository which we could use for this packaging?
FYI, I have packaged and I have j
Hi Jonathan,
When Daniel orphaned this package I got ownership of this ITP. As during
DebConf I've expressed a wish to work on it.
Due to a lot of things happening in my life, I was too busy and didn't have
time to work on it yet.
But starting today, I'm starting on my work to get LXD into Debia
Hi,
This ITP is now over a year old. Is this package still being worked on?
Is there a public WIP repository or packages that people can see yet
please?
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Dowland
Package: wnpp
* Package name : lxd
* URL : http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud/tools/lxd
* License : Apache 2
* Description :
(quoting from the website, not necessarily going to be the package
description..)
The Linux Container Daemon
The new hypervisor isn’t a hypervisor, and it’s much, much faster
LX
23 matches
Mail list logo