Hi Felix,
Il Mercoledì 14 Ottobre 2015 20:21, Felix Zielcke ha
scritto:
>Thanks very much to both of you.
>I created now a github fork for it:
>
>https://github.com/fezie/duperemove
>
>Though I didn't do much yet.
https://github.com/fezie/duperemove/commit/958c4f520a6f9c2552f2b98a3bd1504e
Am Mittwoch, den 14.10.2015, 18:41 +0100 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
> thanks for the fix,
Thanks very much to both of you.
I created now a github fork for it:
https://github.com/fezie/duperemove
Though I didn't do much yet.
>
> (please finish your NM process! we need you :p )
Thanks ag
true story :)
bad copy/paste, sorry!
thanks for the fix,
(please finish your NM process! we need you :p )
G.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
From:"Mattia Rizzolo"
Date:Wed, 14 Oct, 2015 at 19:21
Subject:Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:14:16PM +, G
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:14:16PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> 1) the first patch should be upstreamed
> 2) the second one should be:
> -PREFIX = /usr/local
> +PREFIX ?= /usr
>
> this way you can upstream it too.
> (please forward and add link inside the patches)
well, to upstream that
Another issue:
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/duperemove/0.10-1/blhc
cheers,
G.
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Felix,
let's review.
1) the first patch should be upstreamed
2) the second one should be:
-PREFIX = /usr/local
+PREFIX ?= /usr
this way you can upstream it too.
(please forward and add link inside the patches)
3) copyright is outdated.
xxhash
Hi,
is there now anything missing for getting duperemove into Debian?
7 matches
Mail list logo