On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 09:53:17 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 11:15:36PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I massaged the wording a bit. Here's what I committed for the next
> > release:
> > + Each binary package built from this source package has a
> > +
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 11:15:36PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I massaged the wording a bit. Here's what I committed for the next
> release:
> + Each binary package built from this source package has a
> + corresponding paragraph, except for any automatically-generated
> +
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> >>The first paragraph of the control file contains information about the
>> >>source package in general. The subsequent sets each describe a binary
>> >>package that the source tree builds. All the binary
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >>[…]
> >>
> >>The first paragraph of the control file contains information about the
> >>source package in general. The subsequent sets each describe a binary
> >>package that the source tree builds. All the binary packages have a
> >>corresponding
Tanguy Ortolo writes:
> The Policy implicitly indicates a source package should only build
> binary packages listed in debian/control. At least, this is how
> ftpmaster interprets §5.2, 5.4 and 5.6.19, when you look at the Reject
> FAQ
Tanguy Ortolo, 2016-04-01 11:23+0200:
My new package gspell has just been rejected
That was an explicit April fool, shame on me for not noticing it!
concluding that they are okay with automatic debug packages may have
been a bit premature. I will check what is going on here and update
this
Tanguy Ortolo, 2016-04-01 10:38+0200:
I have just checked on #debian-ftp, and joerg confirmed that they are
okay with automatic debug packages. That question was in fact already
implicitly answered, since they did the work to accept these packages
in the archive!
My new package gspell has
Bill Allombert, 2016-03-31 18:42+0200:
Are the FTP masters happy with that ?
I have just checked on #debian-ftp, and joerg confirmed that they are
okay with automatic debug packages. That question was in fact already
implicitly answered, since they did the work to accept these packages in
Hello, and thanks for the super fast reply.
Bill Allombert, 2016-03-31 18:42+0200:
The Policy implicitly indicates a source package should only build
binary packages listed in debian/control. At least, this is how
ftpmaster interprets §5.2, 5.4 and 5.6.19, when you look at the Reject
FAQ
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 06:28:25PM +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
>
> The Policy implicitly indicates a source package should only build
> binary packages listed in debian/control. At least, this is how
> ftpmaster interprets §5.2, 5.4 and
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
The Policy implicitly indicates a source package should only build
binary packages listed in debian/control. At least, this is how
ftpmaster interprets §5.2, 5.4 and 5.6.19, when you look at the
11 matches
Mail list logo