debian.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 1:53 PM
To: Di-Shi Sun
Cc: 825...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:30:34AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> The upstream source is repackaged and uploaded to mentors.debian.net.
>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:30:34AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> The upstream source is repackaged and uploaded to mentors.debian.net. Would
> you please review it?
I can see how you just removed that copyright header.
But now I want to know why that copyright header was there in the first
place.
--
rg
Subject: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 08:53:02PM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Would you please send us the diff for debian/changelog again? We do
> not find it.
whoops, I apparently forgot to attach it, here it is, sorry.
> For the lice
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 08:53:02PM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Would you please send us the diff for debian/changelog again? We do not find
> it.
whoops, I apparently forgot to attach it, here it is, sorry.
> For the license issue, it is an issue in the upstream project. We will fix
> it in Debian
-
From: 'Mattia Rizzolo' [mailto:mat...@debian.org]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 1:38 PM
To: Di-Shi Sun
Cc: 825...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 09:07:31AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 09:07:31AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> We went through the list and met one issue,
>
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package osptoolkit-dbgsym listed in files list but
> not in control info
> dpkg-genchanges: warning: package libosptk4-dbgsym listed in files list
un
Cc: 825...@bugs.debian.org; 'Support of Transnexus'
Subject: Re: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 05:26:12PM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. We just fixed the upload issues on
> mentors.debian.net. You can find it at
> https
We will work on the items you list.
Thanks,
Di-Shi Sun.
-Original Message-
From: 'Mattia Rizzolo' [mailto:mat...@debian.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 6:47 PM
To: Di-Shi Sun
Cc: 825...@bugs.debian.org; 'Support of Transnexus'
Subject: Re: Bug#825701: should o
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 05:26:12PM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. We just fixed the upload issues on mentors.debian.net.
> You can find it at https://mentors.debian.net/package/osptoolkit
>
> There are several thing about the warning messages on mentors.debian.net
> 1. no-upstrea
June 20, 2016 5:43 PM
To: Di-Shi Sun
Cc: 825...@bugs.debian.org; 'Support of Transnexus'
Subject: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 09:10:41AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> The updated packages are ready.
cool!
> We cannot contact to the
Subject: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 09:10:41AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> The updated packages are ready.
cool!
> We cannot contact to the original sponsor, Julien BLACHE, by email. We
> believe he left Debian.
I can't find such
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 09:10:41AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> The updated packages are ready.
cool!
> We cannot contact to the original sponsor, Julien BLACHE, by email. We
> believe he left Debian.
I can't find such a person in the Debian LDAP, so I wouldn't know (ftr:
the LDAP also contain ret
-Shi Sun.
-Original Message-
From: Di-Shi Sun [mailto:di-...@transnexus.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 8:30 AM
To: 'Mattia Rizzolo'; 825...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Support of Transnexus
Subject: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
Hi Mattia,
The package itself
e 12, 2016 11:46 PM
To: di-...@transnexus.com; 825...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: isupp...@transnexus.com
Subject: Re: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
Hi Di-Shi,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:35:34PM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Sorry for the delay of reply due to the holiday. We are
Hi Di-Shi,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:35:34PM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Sorry for the delay of reply due to the holiday. We are working on it now.
And did anything happen in the last 12 days?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD
debian.org
Subject: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 08:27:16AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Thank you for the notice. But we replied all the emails from Debian in
time.
> The latest one is attached. I do not know why they were not accepted.
you shoul
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 08:27:16AM +0800, Di-Shi Sun wrote:
> Thank you for the notice. But we replied all the emails from Debian in time.
> The latest one is attached. I do not know why they were not accepted.
you should probably teach your MUA (which is outlook, and that doesn't
sound good at al
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#825701: should osptoolkit be removed from Debian?
Source: osptoolkit
Version: 3.4.2-1.2
Severity: serious
This package:
* has very few users https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=osptoolkit
* one unanswered RC bug #804623
* no answer to the other bugs
Source: osptoolkit
Version: 3.4.2-1.2
Severity: serious
This package:
* has very few users https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=osptoolkit
* one unanswered RC bug #804623
* no answer to the other bugs #555877 #786975
* actually you never bothered replying even to the closed bugs #713639
#761
19 matches
Mail list logo