On 20.05.2018 02:20, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> El ds 19 de 05 de 2018 a les 23:39 +0200, Jens Reyer va escriure:
>> I definitely want the well-established system command
>> "update-alternatives" to be used.
>
> What are the requirements?
> "update-alternatives --config wine" must work if wine o
El ds 19 de 05 de 2018 a les 23:39 +0200, Jens Reyer va escriure:
> I definitely want the well-established system command
> "update-alternatives" to be used.
What are the requirements?
"update-alternatives --config wine" must work if wine or wine-
development are installed. Only this one?
smime.p
Hi,
sorry I thought I had answered to this.
On 17.01.2018 17:56, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> X-Debbugs-CC: k...@codeweavers.com
>
> El dc 17 de 01 de 2018 a les 15:48 +0100, Jens Reyer va escriure:
>> The second line is about the master, we always need it. And I want the
>> master to be "wine"
X-Debbugs-CC: k...@codeweavers.com
El dc 17 de 01 de 2018 a les 15:48 +0100, Jens Reyer va escriure:
> The second line is about the master, we always need it. And I want the
> master to be "wine", not "libwine.so.0" (e.g. master's name is used in
> the user interfacing command "update-alternative
On 01/10/2018 09:07 PM, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> El dc 10 de 01 de 2018 a les 19:51 +0100, Jens Reyer va escriure:
>> I'm not sure if you suggest to make libwine (instead of wine) the
>> alternatives-master for all Wine packages - I think that wouldn't work,
>> because each arch has its own lib
> There are no reverse dependencies of libwine, so it is not clear to me
> how this would actually be helpful.
Sorry, I missed your message. lmms-vst-server depends on wine, but I
cannot help with lmms-related packaging right now.
El dc 10 de 01 de 2018 a les 19:51 +0100, Jens Reyer va escriure:
Hi Javier and Mike,
On 06/17/2017 11:16 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
>> Please add a libwine.so.1 alternative to libwine packages, and
>> libwine.so to libwine-dev ones.
>
> There are no reverse dependencies of libwine, so it is not clear to me
> how this would actual
control: tag -1 moreinfo
> Please add a libwine.so.1 alternative to libwine packages, and
> libwine.so to libwine-dev ones.
There are no reverse dependencies of libwine, so it is not clear to me
how this would actually be helpful. Do you have a specific problem
where it would be, if so what is i
Source: wine
Version: 1.8.6-3
Severity: wishlist
Please add a libwine.so.1 alternative to libwine packages, and
libwine.so to libwine-dev ones. These alternatives should be placed
under /usr/lib/MULTIARCH so that applications depending on libwine avoid
the use of RUNPATH and the binary-or-shlib-de
9 matches
Mail list logo