Hi Hilmar,
* Hilmar Preuße [2020-03-14 08:26]:
Am 14.03.2020 um 01:29 teilte Sandro Tosi mit:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote:
* bring it under PAPT maintenance
Is there more to do than creating a source package, adding a new package
below the PAPT group and import the sour
Hi Sandro,
I've lost interest in pssh. At that time I was investigating a couple
of parallel SSH solutions, and I eventually chose ansible.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 08:29:04PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote:
> > Source: pssh
> > Version: 2.3.1-1
> >
>
Am 14.03.2020 um 01:29 teilte Sandro Tosi mit:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote:
>> I plan to salvage pssh and fix at least the following bug:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891340
>
> Not sure if Mo is still interested in salvaging this package, other
> w
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote:
> Source: pssh
> Version: 2.3.1-1
>
> I plan to salvage pssh and fix at least the following bug:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891340
Not sure if Mo is still interested in salvaging this package, other
wise this could be a ni
Hi Mo Zhou,
In preparation for my talk (ITS -- one year later) I came across this
bug and as the 21 day delay has been reached I'm wondering if your are
still intending to salvage the package or if this bug somehow slipped
through some gaps and/or should be closed?
Cheers,
tobi
Source: pssh
Version: 2.3.1-1
I plan to salvage pssh and fix at least the following bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891340
6 matches
Mail list logo