On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 13:03 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Another datapoint: Got a similar report upstream, the attached patch
> made no difference, apart from a slight one in the backtrace.
> Investigating further with the tester.
Thanks a lot for the hint Anthony. The attached patch fixes all the
s
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364440: fixed in f-spot 0.1.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 365102 + patch upstream fixed-upstream pending
Bug#365102: segfault on amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, upstream, fixed-upstream, pending
> forwarded 365102
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1499921&group_
tags 365102 + patch upstream fixed-upstream pending
forwarded 365102
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1499921&group_id=144022&atid=757416
thanks to Sciboy for the debugging help
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 14:02 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'll commit it upstream and in debian sv
Package: revelation
Version: 0.4.5-2
Followup-For: Bug #367578
This is a bit odd. I did an 'apt-get build-dep revelation'. This has resolved
the segfault issue. Revelation starts and seems to function properly, however
the following warning is issued:
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0
Hey,
Another datapoint: Got a similar report upstream, the attached patch
made no difference, apart from a slight one in the backtrace.
Investigating further with the tester. Also, if you want to help
upstream more, join us in #synfig on freenode.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
In
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 367316 important
Bug#367316: nvidia-glx: Does not accelerate
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.96-3
Followup-For: Bug #339085
I want to add emphasis and additional justification to Josh Triplett's
request that the old (POSIX-1992) command line syntax continue to work.
On this issue, I speak primarily as a (semi-retired) GCC maintainer.
Every other month or so
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:38:05PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Hi Seo,
>
> AFAIK, this bug was fixed since libgnome-cil isn't using the old
> gtkhtml3.6 anymore, it's now depending on gtkhtml3.8. Could you
> confirm ?
I can confirm that this bug is fixed. (Sid up-to-date.) Thanks!
Seo Sanghye
Package: amule-utils
Version: 2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: conflicting files
amule-utils fails to upgrade due to a conflicting file:
Preparing to replace amule-utils 2.1.1-3 (using
.../amule-utils_2.1.2-1.1_i386.deb) ...
Leaving `diversion of /usr/bin/ed2k to /usr/bin/ed2k.xmule by
severity 367058 important
thanks
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 01:08:59AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Either way, there is still a bug in gnupg-agent here; at most, the
> > x11-common workaround affects the severity of the gnupg-agent bug, but it's
> > still a gnupg-agent bug. And it's still a bug
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346710: fixed in gnokii 0.6.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367058 important
Bug#367058: existing wrong ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf prevents window manager from
starting, X still runs
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286836: fixed in gnokii 0.6.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364869: fixed in epylog 1.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 358311 + fixed
Bug#358311: dlm: mislinked on mips/mipsel: needs -lpthreads
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 367838 + fixed
Bug#367838: wnn6-sdk: FTBFS: imake config files have moved
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
* Mohammed Sameer [Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:56:29 +0300]:
Hi,
> Package: libzipios++-dev
> Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07-3.3
> Followup-For: Bug #363173
> We can't simply remove the file because if we do, enigma will FTBFS (#232097)
> I guess we have 2 options:
> 1) Remove the file and prevent its
tag 367838 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my wnn6-sdk 1.0.0-14.1 NMU.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Nightmares on Wa
Thanks for the reply, Matthias, but I don't think this is the issue:
# ls /usr/lib | grep GL
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 2006-05-28 13:43 libGLcore.so.1 ->
libGLcore.so.1.0.8762
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.2M 2006-05-23 23:39 libGLcore.so.1.0.8762
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2006-06-02 19:25 libG
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 367838 + patch
Bug#367838: wnn6-sdk: FTBFS: imake config files have moved
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:31:53PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> g++ -o src/socketserverthread.os -c
>> -DNO_CONFIG_H-DVERSION=\"1.4.4\"-DPACKAGE=\"skim\"-DSCIM_VERSION=\"1.4.4\"
>> -I/usr/include/scim-1.0 -DSCIM_BINARY_VERSION=\"1.4.0\"
>> -DSCIM_LIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" -I/usr/include/kde -I/us
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 366005 + fixed
Bug#366005: maintainer address for textopo is wrong
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:56:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libswingwt0
> Severity: serious
> The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>=
> 4:4.1).
> libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.
> [Not checked if a binary NMU would be su
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 08:20:29AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Greetings, Steffen Moeller.
>
> In Debian bug #366005
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366005) it is claimed
> that the address Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> does not
> work, and indeed there is no DNS recor
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:56:55PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libgtk-jni
> Severity: serious
> The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>=
> 4:4.1).
> libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.
> [Not checked if a binary NMU would be suf
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:56:56PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libgnome-jni
> Severity: serious
> The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>=
> 4:4.1).
> libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.
> [Not checked if a binary NMU would be s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 346347 by 347397
Bug#346347: gpsim: FTBFS: build-depends on xlibs-dev
Was blocked by: 248931 347397
Blocking bugs removed: 347397
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 346347 by 346347
Bug#346347: gpsim: FTBFS: build-depends on xlibs-dev
Was blocked by: 248931
Blocking bugs removed: 346347
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:34:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354725: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:50:07PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:38:05PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >> AFAIK, this bug was fixed since libgnome-cil isn't using the old
> >> gtkhtml3.6 anymore, it's now depending on gtkhtml3.8. Could you
> >
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:34:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354725: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:37:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#36: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:32:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369508: fixed in fextremes 221.10065-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:38:05PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, this bug was fixed since libgnome-cil isn't using the old
>> gtkhtml3.6 anymore, it's now depending on gtkhtml3.8. Could you
>> confirm ?
>
> That wouldn't cause this to cease to be a bug in gtkhtm
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:34:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354725: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:38:05PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> AFAIK, this bug was fixed since libgnome-cil isn't using the old
> gtkhtml3.6 anymore, it's now depending on gtkhtml3.8. Could you
> confirm ?
That wouldn't cause this to cease to be a bug in gtkhtml3.6, it would just
mean that the
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:37:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359745: fixed in webalizer 2.01.10-29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:34:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354725: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
I demand that Adeodato Simó may or may not have written...
> * Reinhard Tartler [Fri, 02 Jun 2006 21:41:02 +0200]:
>> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:14:05PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
>>> I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
How about uploading it to experimental first, a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 367502 + fixed
Bug#367502: cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: undeclared functions
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 359841 363077
Bug#359841: hlatex-fonts: FTBFS: Cannot find dh_installtexfonts
Bug#363077: diff for 1.0-3.1 NMU of hlatex-fonts
Merged 359841 363077.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:32:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368846: fixed in emacs-snapshot 1:20060602-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:25:52PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
>> native.c:189: error: 'Java_java_lang_reflect_Constructor_getModifiers'
>> undeclared here (not in a function)
>> native.c:192: error: 'Java_java_lang_reflect_Field_getModifiers' undeclared
>> here (not in a function)
>> native.c
Hi Seo,
AFAIK, this bug was fixed since libgnome-cil isn't using the old
gtkhtml3.6 anymore, it's now depending on gtkhtml3.8. Could you
confirm ?
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
Sorry my delay. But I was trying to sent a webalizer with dpatch support.
But I didnt finished yet.
Well , I sent now to my sponsor , webalizer-2.10-29 with this patch
and will send this new webalizer soon , with patch too :)
If one of you have time and can upload, you can take files here
* Reinhard Tartler [Fri, 02 Jun 2006 21:41:02 +0200]:
Hey,
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:14:05PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
> > > How about uploading it to experimental first, and give more ppl the chance
> > > of actually testing i
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 01:57:58PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Pierre HABOUZIT wrote on 02/06/2006 10:33:
> > severity 367267 serious
> > thanks
> > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:49:31PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> >>http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dresden-ocl/dresden-ocl_1.1.orig.tar.gz
* Julien Delange [Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:50:25 +0200]:
> Yes, I understand, but you know, I not enough time to make a good
> package, so I made dirty ones, and obviously, it's not a good way.
Indeed, uploading dirty packages to the archive is bad for everybody. :(
> > And to both of you, apologies
I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:14:05PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
[snip]
>> On mips, the problem in the buildd log is too-early use of inline
>> functions; you should find that my VDR-patched version is buildable there,
>> or at least fail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 370031 sid
Bug#370031: syslog-summary: depends on unavailable python2.2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 369984 + pending
Bug#369984: package depends on old libgcj6 library
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346736 patch
Bug#346736: gpsim-lcd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:06:56PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > In file included from support.c:16:
> > /usr/include/xfce4/libxfce4util/i18n.h:24:2: error: #error "Only
> > can be included directly, this file may
> > disappear or change contents"
Yeah sorry this package is to be removed.
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:06:52PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > /usr/include/xfce4/libxfce4util/i18n.h:24:2: error: #error "Only
> > can be included directly, this file may
> > disappear or change contents"
Again this is probably going to be removed in favour of thunar but we're
going to
Hi
I have prepared a NMU for gpsim-led to fix both RC bugs.
It fixes this bug by removing xlibs-dev from build-depends and the other one
by applying the patch to prevent segfaulting
(see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=233275)
You can find the NMU under
http://developer.skoleli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 369966 minor
Bug#369966: kernel-image-2.6: Unusable initrd.img is generated when /dev/null
is a regular file
Severity set to `minor' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:14:05PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
>
> >> I'm going to prepare an NMU (sponsored by Adeodato Simó) which may or may
> >> not fix this bug (but will fix various others, particularly the build
> >> failure on s
Hi
I have prepared a NMU for gpsim-led to fix both RC bugs.
It fixes this bug by removing xlibs-dev from build-depends and the other one
by applying the patch to prevent segfaulting
(see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=233275)
You can find the NMU under
http://developer.skoleli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 346742 by 346347
Bug#346742: gpsim-led: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Was blocked by: 346347
Blocking bugs removed: 346347
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Hi Kevin,
On 2 June 2006 at 11:41, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| On 5/31/06, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > deb-science'rs,
| >
| > Anybody here who could help me with a Fortran problem?
| >
| > I cannot compil one (old) routine in the source package fmultivar with
I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:17:48PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
>> I'm going to prepare an NMU (sponsored by Adeodato Simó) which may or may
>> not fix this bug (but will fix various others, particularly the build
>> failure on sparc, wh
Package: gipsc
Version: 0.4.3-2
Severity: serious
The gipsc package installs to /usr/X11R6/bin, which is an FHS violation;
only packages using xmkmf/imake are allowed to use this heirarchy, which is
now deprecated with X11R7. This makes the gipsc package uninstallable now,
because /usr/X11R6/bin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346736 patch
Bug#346736: gpsim-lcd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Package: zope-zshell
Severity: serious
Hello,
zope-zshell use removed from unstable python2.2.
--- zope-zshell-1.60.orig/debian/control
+++ zope-zshell-1.60/debian/control
[...]
+
+Package: zope-zshell
+Architecture: all
+Depends: zope2.8, jaxml, python2.2
+Description: command line interface t
Package: syslog-summary
Severity: serious
Hello,
syslog-summary use removed from unstable python2.2.
syslog-summary-1.12/debian/control
[...]
+Package: syslog-summary
+Architecture: all
+Depends: python2.2
+Description: Summarize the contents of a syslog log file
[...]
--
Cheers
Wiesiek
--
T
Hi
Now the blocking bug is removed and I have prepared a NMU for gpsim-lcd.
I simply removed the xlibs-dev build-dependency.
You can find the finish NMU under
http://developer.skolelinux.org/~white/debs/nmu/gpsim-lcd/
I also attached the whole patch.
Greetings
Steffen
diff -u gpsim-lcd-0.1.1/con
Le Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:52:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó :
> On second thoughts, I won't fix this myself, since I prefer to make sure
> that Julien understands what was wrong, why the builds failed, and how
> does one fix it, and me rushing in an upload just to save a bit of buildd
> time won't help
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:51:51PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release;
> please build your package using gcj (>= 4:4.1) or gcj-4.1. The
> libgcjX-dev dependency is not needed anymore.
2.8a was released a couple of days ago, I'll a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346745 patch
Bug#346745: gpsim-logic: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11
Tags: patch
If you have a situation where some packages A, B, C
A -depends-> B' <-provides B
B -depends-> C' <-provides C
C -depends-> A' <-provides A
then dpkg doesn't break the cycle correctly. This breaks for any
length of cycle, not just 3 packages.
Package: vim
Version: 1:7.0-017+5
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace vim-common 1:6.4-007+1 (using
.../vim-common_1%3a7.0-017+5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement vim-common ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-common_1%3a7.0-017+5_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 346736 by 346347
Bug#346736: gpsim-lcd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Was blocked by: 346347
Blocking bugs removed: 346347
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 365234 pending
Bug#365234: libtasn1-2: Please patch to fix CVE-2006-0645 security issue
Tags were: security patch
Bug#352182: Crash in the ASN.1 DER decoder
Tags added: pending
> # I have uploaded libtasn1-3 to experimental, it is sitting in NEW
>
Hi,
what you're suggesting is present in version 0.8.X, which is not yet ready
to go into FreeMind for reasons explained in another bug.
Eric
> Package: freemind
> Version: 0.7.1-6
> Followup-For: Bug #369752
>
> Thank you very much indeed. It works now :).
>
>
> Perhaps there should be neverthe
Hi
Now the blocking bug is removed and I have prepared a NMU for gpsim-logic.
I simply removed the xlibs-dev build-dependency.
You can find the finish NMU under
http://developer.skolelinux.org/~white/debs/nmu/gpsim-logic/
I also attached the whole patch.
Greetings
Steffen
diff -u gpsim-logic-0.0
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:52:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> And to both of you, apologies if I'm a bit pushy at times, it's only
> that I like things well done. Also, I'll be happy if you want to sponsor
> the next upload if Julien Danjou is short of time, and go with soda
> through fixing th
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:23:58 +0200]:
> Since I just NMUed, and failed to spot this bug (since my upload included
> binary-all, and did not trigger the bug), I'll make a second upload
> right away.
> Apologies for not spotting this,
On second thoughts, I won't fix this myself, since
Package: libcamomile-ocaml-dev
Version: 0.6.3-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
libcamomile-ocaml-dev's debian/control entry specifies a strict
dependency on libcamomile-ocaml-data (= ${Source-Version}). Because
the latter is architecture-independent, bi
Package: libsdl1.2debian-all
Version: 1.2.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.6
libsdl1.2debian-all.shlibs is unduly strict, specifying an as yet
unsatisfiable dependency on libsdl1.2debian (>> 1.2.10-1), where >=
would be more appropriate; I suspect the other libsdl1.2debian-*
packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 346745 by 346347
Bug#346745: gpsim-logic: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Was blocked by: 346347
Blocking bugs removed: 346347
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 369013 critical
Bug#369013: evms: install script says 'ln: creating symbolic link... No such
file or directory'
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'
>
End of message, s
tag 369959 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my amule 2.1.2-1.1 NMU.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in h
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 16:44 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:14:48PM -0300, Jose Carlos Medeiros wrote:
> Hello Jose,
>
> > You are right.
> > I will upload webalizer patched today.
>
> Any news ?
I'm also waiting a bit... :) Thanks in advance for your work.
Thijs
sig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 369959 + fixed
Bug#369959: amule-utils: missing Replaces: amule-common (<< 2.1.2-1)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
This bug could/should be closed to get f-spot into testing eventually.
tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 369959 + patch
Bug#369959: amule-utils: missing Replaces: amule-common (<< 2.1.2-1)
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
tags 368967 + wontfix
reassign 368967 ftp.debian.org
severity 368967 serious
retitle 368967 RM: gcj-4.0 -- old gcj packages, replaced by gcj-4.1
block 368967 by 369983 369990 369986 369979 369982 369984 369985 369980 369988
369981 369989 369987
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 369966 linux-2.6
Bug#369966: kernel-image-2.6: Unusable initrd.img is generated when /dev/null
is a regular file
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processi
Package: libgnomevfs2-0
Version: 2.14.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Attempting to open a previous ssh/sftp folder causes several terminal windows to
open/close very quickly and then nothing.
Creating a new ssh/sftp connection, a terminal window flashes briefly and
t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 368967 + wontfix
Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> reassign 368967 ftp.debian.org
Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no
files list file: No such file or
directory
**
Build finished at 20060602-0733
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
See http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=amule.
Since I just NMUed, and failed to spot this
Package: libopenvrml5
Severity: serious
The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.
[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: libgnome-jni
Severity: serious
The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.
[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file
> mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user
> does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file,
> then I indeed
Package: libgtk-jni
Severity: serious
The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.
[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 364550 normal
Bug#364550: adept: crash on startup
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Package: libgnujaxp-java
Severity: serious
gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release;
please build your package using gcj (>= 4:4.1) or gcj-4.1. The
libgcjX-dev dependency is not needed anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Package: libgnucrypto-java
Severity: serious
gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release;
please build your package using gcj (>= 4:4.1) or gcj-4.1. The
libgcjX-dev dependency is not needed anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Package: bigloo
Severity: serious
gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release;
please build your package using gcj (>= 4:4.1) or gcj-4.1. The
libgcjX-dev dependency is not needed anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
