Bug#943405: marked as done (unsuitable for release: no upstream patch releases)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:35:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068834: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #943405, regarding unsuitable for release: no upstream patch releases to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#965710: marked as done (lua5.1-policy: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:34:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068839: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965710, regarding lua5.1-policy: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#916857: marked as done (el-get: fails to install with xemacs21)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:34:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068837: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #916857, regarding el-get: fails to install with xemacs21 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#912364: marked as done (el-get: not suitable for stable release)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:34:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068837: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #912364, regarding el-get: not suitable for stable release to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#855461: marked as done (esniper: fails to login to eBay)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:33:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068841: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #855461, regarding esniper: fails to login to eBay to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#1068827: marked as done (Changes from the 0.14.1-5.1 NMU were discarded)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:34:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068827: fixed in falcosecurity-libs 0.15.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068827, regarding Changes from the 0.14.1-5.1 NMU were discarded to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1003654: marked as done (ptex-jtex: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068835: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1003654, regarding ptex-jtex: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1052197: marked as done (xrdp: after bullseye-security upgrade, empty turquoise screen after logging in)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:44:42 +0200 with message-id and subject line xrdp: after bullseye-security upgrade, empty turquoise screen after logging in has caused the Debian Bug report #1052197, regarding xrdp: after bullseye-security upgrade, empty turquoise screen after logging in t

Processed: re: openjfx: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Tags 1068159 +patch Bug #1068159 [src:openjfx] openjfx: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" Added tag(s) patch. > Thanks Stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#1068159: openjfx: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

Tags 1068159 +patch Thanks The build failure is caused by the following in modules/javafx.media/src/main/native/gstreamer/gstreamer-lite/projects/build/linux/common/config.h > /* Number of bits in a file offset, on hosts where this is settable. */ > #undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS Looking at the file,

Bug#1066658: sup: FTBFS: scm.c:316:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘setproctitle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Tags: patch Hi, ,On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:57:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: scm.c: In function ‘service’: scm.c:316:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘setproctitle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 316 | setproctitle("Serving %s", remotehost()); | ^

Bug#1065790: marked as done (libosmo-netif: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: tests fail)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:50:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065790: fixed in libosmo-netif 1.2.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065790, regarding libosmo-netif: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: tests fail to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1067066: ruby-fusefs: fusefs_fuse.c:31:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fuse_chan_fd’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: ruby-fusefs Followup-For: Bug #1067066 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * debian/patches/fix-missing-includes.patch: Add missing in

Processed: Re: ruby-fusefs: fusefs_fuse.c:31:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fuse_chan_fd’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1067066 [src:ruby-fusefs] ruby-fusefs: fusefs_fuse.c:31:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fuse_chan_fd’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067066: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067066

Bug#1068194: marked as done (pcsx2: FTBFS: /<>/plugins/cdvdGigaherz/src/CDVD.cpp:143:19: error: ‘system_error’ in namespace ‘std’ does not name a type)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:23:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068194: fixed in pcsx2 1.6.0+dfsg-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068194, regarding pcsx2: FTBFS: /<>/plugins/cdvdGigaherz/src/CDVD.cpp:143:19: error: ‘system_error’ in namespace ‘std’ does not name a

Bug#1068806: marked as done (Update Build-Depends for the time64 library renames)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:22:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068806: fixed in osmo-bts 1.5.0+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068806, regarding Update Build-Depends for the time64 library renames to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1067615: marked as done (FTBFS: error: size of array ‘dummyinfo_does_not_fit’ is negative)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:22:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067615: fixed in osmo-pcu 1.1.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067615, regarding FTBFS: error: size of array ‘dummyinfo_does_not_fit’ is negative to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: prime-phylo: FTBFS: gb.tab.c:1096:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066653 [src:prime-phylo] prime-phylo: FTBFS: gb.tab.c:1096:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066653 Deb

Bug#1066653: prime-phylo: FTBFS: gb.tab.c:1096:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: prime-phylo Followup-For: Bug #1066653 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-with-gcc13.patch: Fix missing he

Processed: pcsx2: diff for NMU version 1.6.0+dfsg-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 1068194 + patch Bug #1068194 [src:pcsx2] pcsx2: FTBFS: /<>/plugins/cdvdGigaherz/src/CDVD.cpp:143:19: error: ‘system_error’ in namespace ‘std’ does not name a type Added tag(s) patch. -- 1068194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068194 Debia

Bug#1068194: pcsx2: diff for NMU version 1.6.0+dfsg-2.1

Control: tags 1068194 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for pcsx2 (versioned as 1.6.0+dfsg-2.1). The diff is attached to this message. Regards. -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru pcsx2-1.6.0+dfsg/debian/changelog pcsx2-1.6.0+dfsg/debian/changelog --- pcsx2-1.6.0+dfsg/debian/changelo

Bug#1067654: marked as done (tpm2-abrmd: Tests fail on 32-bit t64 arches)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:51:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067654: fixed in tpm2-abrmd 3.0.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067654, regarding tpm2-abrmd: Tests fail on 32-bit t64 arches to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1067830: marked as done (gri: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: gr.cc:426:22: error: cannot convert ‘long int*’ to ‘time_t*’ {aka ‘long long int*’})

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:49:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067830: fixed in gri 2.12.27-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067830, regarding gri: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: gr.cc:426:22: error: cannot convert ‘long int*’ to ‘time_t*’ {aka ‘long long int*’} to be marked

Processed: gri: diff for NMU version 2.12.27-1.2

Processing control commands: > tags 1067830 + patch Bug #1067830 [src:gri] gri: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: gr.cc:426:22: error: cannot convert ‘long int*’ to ‘time_t*’ {aka ‘long long int*’} Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067830: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067830 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1067830: gri: diff for NMU version 2.12.27-1.2

Control: tags 1067830 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gri (versioned as 2.12.27-1.2). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru gri-2.12.27/debian/changelog gri-2.12.27/debian/changelog --- gri-2.12.27/debian/changelog 2022-08-25 18:33:47.000

Bug#1067418: marked as done (Tests fail on 32-bit t64 arches)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:21:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067418: fixed in tpm2-tss 4.0.1-7.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067418, regarding Tests fail on 32-bit t64 arches to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#1067654: tpm2-abrmd: diff for NMU version 3.0.0-1.1

Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for tpm2-abrmd (versioned as 3.0.0-1.1). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru tpm2-abrmd-3.0.0/debian/changelog tpm2-abrmd-3.0.0/debian/changelog --- tpm2-abrmd-3.0.0/debian/changelog 2022-12-12 00:47:34.0 +010

Processed: Re: pike8.0: FTBFS: zlibmod.c:1235:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pop_n_elems’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066378 [src:pike8.0] pike8.0: FTBFS: zlibmod.c:1235:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pop_n_elems’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1066378 to the same tags previously set -- 1066378: http

Bug#1066378: pike8.0: FTBFS: zlibmod.c:1235:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pop_n_elems’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: pike8.0 Followup-For: Bug #1066378 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, This is an update to the previous patch that contains further fixes to the package. In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achi

Processed: tpm2-tss: diff for NMU version 4.0.1-7.2

Processing control commands: > tags 1067418 + patch Bug #1067418 [src:tpm2-tss] Tests fail on 32-bit t64 arches Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067418: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067418 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1067418: tpm2-tss: diff for NMU version 4.0.1-7.2

Control: tags 1067418 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for tpm2-tss (versioned as 4.0.1-7.2). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru tpm2-tss-4.0.1/debian/changelog tpm2-tss-4.0.1/debian/changelog --- tpm2-tss-4.0.1/debian/changelog 2024-02-29

Bug#1066378: pike8.0: FTBFS: zlibmod.c:1235:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pop_n_elems’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Package: pike8.0 Followup-For: Bug #1066378 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * debian/patches/gz_test_fix.patch: Fix zlib detection logic.

Processed: Re: pike8.0: FTBFS: zlibmod.c:1235:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pop_n_elems’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1066378 [src:pike8.0] pike8.0: FTBFS: zlibmod.c:1235:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pop_n_elems’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Added tag(s) patch. -- 1066378: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066378 Debia

Bug#1066313: fixed upstream

These issues are fixed upstream in main, but there is not a release. The fix is in commit 1171bf2fd4e7a0cab02cf5fca59090b65af9cd29. Clément would you pull that fix into the package to resolve this FTBFS?

Processed: block 1036884 with 1068078

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1036884 with 1068078 Bug #1036884 [release.debian.org] transition: time64_t 1036884 was blocked by: 1065787 1068325 1067288 1065940 1067171 1055352 1067829 1068160 1067494 1067509 1055530 1066328 1067676 1066794 1066134 1067192 1067916 106

Processed: tagging 1066851

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1066851 + ftbfs Bug #1066851 [src:raku-readline] don't hard-code the name of the shared library Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1066851: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Processed: block 1036884 with 1065725

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1036884 with 1065725 Bug #1036884 [release.debian.org] transition: time64_t 1036884 was blocked by: 1067677 1067288 1066134 1067272 1055530 1067509 1065816 1067561 1065787 1068325 1065973 1066328 1067190 1065790 1067494 1062847 1067508 106

Bug#1068811: marked as done (camv-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:49:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068811: fixed in camv-rnd 1.1.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068811, regarding camv-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Processed: Re: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1068812: pcb-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1068812 minor Bug #1068812 [pcb-rnd] pcb-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious' > tags 1068812 +pending Bug #1068812 [pcb-rnd] pcb-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping

Bug#1068840: llvm-toolchain-14: FTBFS on mips64el: /<>/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/clear_cache.c:97:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'syscall' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit

Source: llvm-toolchain-14 Version: 1:14.0.6-19 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-14&arch=mips64el&ver=1%3A14.0.6-19&stamp=1712

Bug#1068810: marked as done (sch-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:17:44 -0600 with message-id <87h6g7emjr@gag.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #1068810, regarding sch-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1068810: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1068810: sch-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency

Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > Hello, I found that librnd4 is correctly evaluated from shlibs:Depends > in the core library and then it can be dropped also on core > reverse-dependencies. The point of the dependency is to require version 4.1.0 or later, since that's the librnd version that adde

Bug#1066421: marked as done (mpb: FTBFS: ././conftest.c:44:(.text.startup+0xb): undefined reference to `foobar')

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:34:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066421: fixed in mpb 1.11.1-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066421, regarding mpb: FTBFS: ././conftest.c:44:(.text.startup+0xb): undefined reference to `foobar' to be marked as done. This means that y

Processed: closing 1060768

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1060768 Bug #1060768 [pdudaemon] pdudaemon: Missing dependency on python3-aiohttp Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1060768: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#1066421: mpb: diff for NMU version 1.11.1-5.1

Control: tags 1066421 + patch Control: tags 1066421 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for mpb (versioned as 1.11.1-5.1) and uploaded it to unstable. Regards. -- WBR, wRAR diff -Nru mpb-1.11.1/debian/changelog mpb-1.11.1/debian/changelog --- mpb-1.11.1/debian/changelog 2022-12-15

Processed: mpb: diff for NMU version 1.11.1-5.1

Processing control commands: > tags 1066421 + patch Bug #1066421 [src:mpb] mpb: FTBFS: ././conftest.c:44:(.text.startup+0xb): undefined reference to `foobar' Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1066421 + pending Bug #1066421 [src:mpb] mpb: FTBFS: ././conftest.c:44:(.text.startup+0xb): undefined reference

Bug#1067337: marked as done (golang-github-dchest-uniuri: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 github.com/dchest/uniuri returned exit code 1)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:04:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1067337: fixed in golang-github-dchest-uniuri 0.0~git20221007.a87ec9d-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067337, regarding golang-github-dchest-uniuri: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu &&

Bug#1068371: marked as done (indi-apogee dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:04:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068371: fixed in indi-apogee 1.9+20221223184417-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068371, regarding indi-apogee dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures. to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#1066340: marked as done (t4kcommon: FTBFS: linebreak.c:163:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘u8_mbtouc_unsafe’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Dear Chris, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:51:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:50:02 + > From: Debian FTP Masters > To: 1066340-cl...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Bug#1066340: fixed in t4kcommon 0.1.1-11.2 > Reply-To: Chris Hofstaedtler thanks for that NMU

Bug#1068145: marked as done (FTBFS: chmod: cannot access 'debian/python-mpltoolkits.basemap-data/usr/share/basemap/data/*': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:49:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068145: fixed in basemap 1.2.2+dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068145, regarding FTBFS: chmod: cannot access 'debian/python-mpltoolkits.basemap-data/usr/share/basemap/data/*': No such file or direc

Bug#1066340: marked as done (t4kcommon: FTBFS: linebreak.c:163:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘u8_mbtouc_unsafe’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:50:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066340: fixed in t4kcommon 0.1.1-11.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066340, regarding t4kcommon: FTBFS: linebreak.c:163:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘u8_mbtouc_unsafe’ [-Werror=implicit-fu

Processed: retitle 1063143 to filament: FTBFS: fatal error: 'localintermediate.h' file not found

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1063143 filament: FTBFS: fatal error: 'localintermediate.h' file not > found Bug #1063143 [src:filament] filament: FTBFS on armel: fatal error: 'localintermediate.h' file not found Changed Bug title to 'filament: FTBFS: fatal error: 'loc

Bug#1067337: marked as pending in golang-github-dchest-uniuri

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1067337 in golang-github-dchest-uniuri reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-dches

Processed: Bug#1067337 marked as pending in golang-github-dchest-uniuri

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1067337 [src:golang-github-dchest-uniuri] golang-github-dchest-uniuri: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 github.com/dchest/uniuri returned exit code 1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1067337: https://bugs

Processed: tagging 1067190

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1067190 + ftbfs Bug #1067190 [timekpr-next] timekpr-next: hard-coded dependency on libgtk-3-0 will become uninstallable on armel/armhf Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1067

Bug#952735: gnupg-pkcs11-scd: when used as scdaemon, `gnupg --card-status` reports wrong informations

Control: severity -1 normal Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/alonbl/gnupg-pkcs11-scd/issues/61 I can reproduce this bug with my card reader and I forwarded the bug upstream -> https://github.com/alonbl/gnupg-pkcs11-scd/issues/61 As this is just a cosmectic bug, I reduce severity again

Processed: Re: gnupg-pkcs11-scd: when used as scdaemon, `gnupg --card-status` reports wrong informations

Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #952735 [gnupg-pkcs11-scd] gnupg-pkcs11-scd: when used as scdaemon, `gnupg --card-status` reports wrong informations Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > forwarded -1 https://github.com/alonbl/gnupg-pkcs11-scd/issues/61 Bug #952735 [gnupg

Processed: Re: Bug#1066860: libprelude ftbfs on time_t64 archs

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1066860 {Done: Benjamin Drung } [src:libprelude] libprelude ftbfs on time_t64 archs 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer ma

Bug#1066860: libprelude ftbfs on time_t64 archs

Control: reopen -1 On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 04:14:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > libprelude ftbfs on time_t64 archs with symbols file mismatches. This still happens, it wasn't addressed in the upload that closed this: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libprelude&arch=armel&ver=

Bug#1068827: Changes from the 0.14.1-5.1 NMU were discarded

Source: falcosecurity-libs Version: 0.15.1-1 Severity: serious 0.15.1-1 doesn't seem to contain changes from 0.14.1-5.1, both the changelog entry and the actual changes. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 't

Processed: found 1067619 in falcosecurity-libs/0.15.1-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1067619 falcosecurity-libs/0.15.1-1 Bug #1067619 [src:falcosecurity-libs] FTBFS: tests segfault Marked as found in versions falcosecurity-libs/0.15.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 106761

Processed: Bug#1068145 marked as pending in basemap

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1068145 [src:basemap] FTBFS: chmod: cannot access 'debian/python-mpltoolkits.basemap-data/usr/share/basemap/data/*': No such file or directory Added tag(s) pending. -- 1068145: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068145 Debian B

Bug#1068145: marked as pending in basemap

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1068145 in basemap reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/basemap/-/commit/ef8a33ac9a105b0f9cd

Processed: tagging 1068818

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1068818 + upstream Bug #1068818 [src:sngrep] sngrep: CVE-2024-3119 CVE-2024-3120 Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1068818: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#1068808: marked as done (openmpi-bin has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/pterm)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:51:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068808: fixed in openmpi 5.0.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068808, regarding openmpi-bin has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/pterm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#1056054: marked as done (openmpi-doc: /usr/share/man/man1/pterm.1.gz is already shipped by pterm)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:51:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056054: fixed in openmpi 5.0.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056054, regarding openmpi-doc: /usr/share/man/man1/pterm.1.gz is already shipped by pterm to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Processed: re: ppp: FTBFS due -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1036884 by 1066134 Bug #1036884 [release.debian.org] transition: time64_t 1036884 was blocked by: 1055352 1067676 1067288 1067916 1068327 1068586 1067829 1067494 1065787 1065790 1068160 1066049 1067190 1055530 1066794 1067677 1068325 10671

Bug#1066134: ppp: FTBFS due -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

block 1036884 by 1066134 tags 1066134 +patch thanks Hi. The build failure of ppp in unstable is a blocker for the time_t transition, since ppp needs to be rebuilt against the new versions of libpcap and openssl. The version in experimental seems to build fine. Can you fix this, either by adding

Processed (with 1 error): tagging 1068815, tagging 1068816, tagging 1068817, tagging 168818, tagging 1068820, tagging 1068819 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1068815 + upstream Bug #1068815 [src:undertow] undertow: CVE-2023-1973 Added tag(s) upstream. > tags 1068816 + upstream Bug #1068816 [src:undertow] undertow: CVE-2024-1459 Added tag(s) upstream. > tags 1068817 + upstream Bug #1068817 [src:und

Bug#1066688: marked as done (ng: FTBFS: dir.c:127:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rchdir’; did you mean ‘vchdir’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:50:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066688: fixed in ng 1.5~beta1-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066688, regarding ng: FTBFS: dir.c:127:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rchdir’; did you mean ‘vchdir’? [-Werror=implicit-functi

Bug#1063874: marked as done (m2crypto: Testsuite fails with OpenSSL 3.2)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:50:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063874: fixed in m2crypto 0.40.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063874, regarding m2crypto: Testsuite fails with OpenSSL 3.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processed: tagging 1067916

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1067916 + help Bug #1067916 [src:capnproto] FTBFS: tests failed Added tag(s) help. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1067916: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067916 Debian Bug

Bug#1068818: sngrep: CVE-2024-3119 CVE-2024-3120

Source: sngrep X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for sngrep. CVE-2024-3119[0]: | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in all versions of sngrep | since v0.4.2, due to improper handling of 'Call-ID' and 'X-Call

Bug#1066512: marked as done (latencytop: FTBFS: fsync.c:330:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gettimeofday’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:35:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066512: fixed in latencytop 0.5.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066512, regarding latencytop: FTBFS: fsync.c:330:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gettimeofday’ [-Werror=implicit-function-de

Bug#1068816: undertow: CVE-2024-1459

Source: undertow X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerability was published for undertow. CVE-2024-1459[0]: | A path traversal vulnerability was found in Undertow. This issue may | allow a remote attacker to append a specially-crafted sequ

Processed (with 1 error): nmu for 1065457 will fix this bug too

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1066321 + pending Bug #1066321 [src:openzwave] openzwave: FTBFS: cc1plus: error: ‘-Werror=’ argument ‘-Werror=implicit-function-declaration’ is not valid for C++ [-Werror] Added tag(s) pending. > done Unknown command or malformed arguments t

Bug#1068484: marked as done (juce-modules-source: Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev but it is no longer built)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:05:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068484: fixed in juce 7.0.5+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068484, regarding juce-modules-source: Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev but it is no longer built to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#1066386: marked as done (examl: FTBFS: quartets.c:393:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘basename’; did you mean ‘rename’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066386: fixed in examl 3.0.22-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066386, regarding examl: FTBFS: quartets.c:393:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘basename’; did you mean ‘rename’? [-Werror=impli

Bug#1066475: marked as done (libpsortb: FTBFS: debug_funcs.c:320:38: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_mtx_index’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:36:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066475: fixed in libpsortb 1.0+dfsg-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066475, regarding libpsortb: FTBFS: debug_funcs.c:320:38: error: implicit declaration of function ‘get_mtx_index’ [-Werror=implicit-fun

Bug#1068484: marked as done (juce-modules-source: Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev but it is no longer built)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:36:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1068484: fixed in juce 7.0.11+ds-1~exp2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068484, regarding juce-modules-source: Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev but it is no longer built to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Bug#1068484 marked as pending in juce

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1068484 [src:juce] juce-modules-source: Depends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-dev but it is no longer built Added tag(s) pending. -- 1068484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068484 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Bug#1068484: marked as pending in juce

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1068484 in juce reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/juce/-/commit/8589e4cb7ab11c92780c062347ca41

Bug#1068812: pcb-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency

Package: pcb-rnd Version: 3.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hello, I found that librnd4 is correctly evaluated from shlibs:Depends in the core library and then it can be dropped also on core reverse-dependencies. Please drop it. Thanks for considering the patch. diff -Nru pcb-rnd-3.1.4

Processed: Re: sch-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1068810 [sch-rnd] sch-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 1068810: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068810 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1068811: camv-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency

Package: camv-rnd Version: 1.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hello, I found that librnd4 is correctly evaluated from shlibs:Depends in the core library and then it can be dropped also on core reverse-dependencies. Please drop it. Thanks for considering the patch. diff -Nru camv-rnd-1.1

Bug#1065457: openzwave: diff for NMU version 1.6.1914+ds-1.2

Control: tags 1065457 + patch Control: tags 1065457 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for openzwave (versioned as 1.6.1914+ds-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru openzwave-1.6.1914+ds/debian/changelog openz

Processed: openzwave: diff for NMU version 1.6.1914+ds-1.2

Processing control commands: > tags 1065457 + patch Bug #1065457 [src:openzwave] openzwave: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1065457 + pending Bug #1065457 [src:openzwave] openzwave: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting Added tag(s) pendin

Processed: openmpi-bin has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/pterm

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + pterm Bug #1068808 [openmpi-bin] openmpi-bin has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/pterm Added indication that 1068808 affects pterm -- 1068808: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068808 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@b

Bug#1068808: openmpi-bin has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/pterm

Package: openmpi-bin Version: 5.0.3-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fileconflict Control: affects -1 + pterm openmpi-bin has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error from dpkg. The file /usr/bin/pterm is contained in the packages * openmpi-bi

Processed: affects 1067311

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1067311 + src:matplotlib Bug #1067311 [src:ipywidgets] ipywidgets: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: jupyter-nbextension-jupyter-js-widgets (= 8.1.1-3) but 8.1.1-2 is to be installed Bug #1067315 [src:ipywidgets] matplotlib: FTBFS:

Bug#1066285: marked as done (nvi: FTBFS: ../dist/../common/options_f.c:324:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'conv_enc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:19:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066285: fixed in nvi 1.81.6-21 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066285, regarding nvi: FTBFS: ../dist/../common/options_f.c:324:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'conv_enc' [-Werror=implicit-funct

Processed: reassign 1067315 to src:ipywidgets, affects 1067315, forcibly merging 1067311 1067315

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1067315 src:ipywidgets Bug #1067315 [src:matplotlib] matplotlib: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: jupyter-nbextension-jupyter-js-widgets (= 8.1.1-3) but 8.1.1-2 is to be installed Bug reassigned from package 'src:matplotlib' to 's

Processed (with 1 error): forcibly merging 1067311 1067315

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1067311 1067315 Bug #1067311 [src:ipywidgets] ipywidgets: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: jupyter-nbextension-jupyter-js-widgets (= 8.1.1-3) but 8.1.1-2 is to be installed Unable to merge bugs because: package of #1067315 is 's

Processed: Re: Bug#1067367: mathgl: FTBFS: debian/tests/run-tests: 37: python3.12: not found

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1067367 [src:mathgl] mathgl: FTBFS: debian/tests/run-tests: 37: python3.12: not found Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067367: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Bug#1067367: mathgl: FTBFS: debian/tests/run-tests: 37: python3.12: not found

Control: tags -1 + patch Hi, On 2024-03-20 09:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > debian/tests/run-tests: 37: python3.12: not found This is because debian/tests/run-tests iterates over all supported python versions (py3versions -s), but only python3.11 is installed. Please consider build-depending on

Processed: block 1036884 with 1065790

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1036884 with 1065790 Bug #1036884 [release.debian.org] transition: time64_t 1036884 was blocked by: 1065816 1065787 1068068 1067494 1067190 1067829 1068327 1067561 1067677 1066049 1067189 1067171 1055352 1067676 1067192 1067193 1067069 106

Bug#1068806: Update Build-Depends for the time64 library renames

Source: osmo-bts Version: 1.5.0dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs The package explicitly Build-Depends: libosmocoding0, this needs to be changed to libosmocoding0t64 if this dep is needed at all. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500

Bug#1068805: python3-pywt: distutils not available in Python 3.12

Package: python3-pywt Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: serious Dear maintainer, pywt directly depends on distutils, which is no longer available on Python 3.12. in pywt/__init__.py: ---8<-- from __future__ import division, print_function, absolute_import from distutils.v

Bug#1067371: marked as done (nncp: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/libfontmanager.so: libharfbuzz.so.0: cannot open shared obje

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 06:56:40 -0500 with message-id <87cyqw5cx1@complete.org> and subject line Fixed by a newer plantuml has caused the Debian Bug report #1067371, regarding nncp: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd

Bug#1066300: marked as done (ampliconnoise: FTBFS: FCluster.c:230:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘UpdateMinCacheForRow’; did you mean ‘UpdateMinCacheForMarkedRows’? [-Werror=implicit-func

Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:19:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1066300: fixed in ampliconnoise 1.29-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1066300, regarding ampliconnoise: FTBFS: FCluster.c:230:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘UpdateMinCacheForRow’; did you mea

  1   2   >