Your message dated Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:03:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#699884: fixed in syslinux 3:4.05+dfsg-6+deb7u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #699884,
regarding debian-cd: 2013-02-04 i386 weekly builds are unable to boot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:03:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#699890: fixed in syslinux 3:4.05+dfsg-6+deb7u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #699890,
regarding syslinux breakage causes i386/amd64 boot failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Hi,
We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates,
all of which appear to currently work for me:
February 23rd
March 2nd
March 9th
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:25:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
> it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
> pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates,
>
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:25:38PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
>it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
>pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates,
>all of which a
5 matches
Mail list logo