On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Erich Schubert wrote:
> I REALLY REALLY would like to see translated apt in woody.
> And i cannot understand why apt-i18n is not installed so we could
> test it. Adding apt-i18n to unstable will not break anything, but
> interested developers can test this before adding it to
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Looking at the build logs for antlr, the jikes bug in question (on
> alpha, right? #123041) has already been fixed. Somebody should
> reschedule that build.
My personal impression is that jikes in sid is very broken.
Some packages that use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I don't know if my locale is causing it or what. The problem is that as
> soon as I try to gpg -e to edit a key I get the following junk.
[23:24:22] wesley:~ $ gpg --help|grep -e -e
-e, --encryptencrypt data
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dale> There are an ever growing number of packages that make use of
Dale> the GNU Free Documentation License. Isn't it about time to put
Dale> a copy of this license into the common reference area?
Depends. Would you say that at leas
>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> I checked had a stagnating number of subscribers than a few
Josip> months before, the traffic on the web pages continues to
Josip> slowly grow or stagnate in the new year, and the major
Josip> mirrors' traffic is also growing bit by b
Evening folks,
Got something weird for you. This has been happening over the last 5 or
6 revisions of gpg and I have absolutely *no* clue what is causing it.
I don't know if my locale is causing it or what. The problem is that as
soon as I try to gpg -e to edit a key I get the following junk.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:42:38PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 1:24 pm, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > velocity werken.xpathantlr
>
> These are all pretty much bug free (antlr has a couple of wishlist
> bugs) but a jikes bug is keeping them out of testing. Does any
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:51:23AM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 07:30:21PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 18:59, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > > The keyword here is "prominent".
> >
> > Yes, it is.
> >
> > > The
> > > Debian servers don't run non-free soft
Martin Schulze wrote:
> If I get this right, then registration for the Debian Conference,
> to a conference run by Free Software bigots, goes through heavily
> non-free and proprietary software that we are not even allowed to
> place in our non-free section outside of our distribution.
Received:
On Apr 07, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> It subverts my principles (and probably also others). The fact that
> the company itself is probably also going to distribute non-free
> software also subverts my principles.
>
> The thing I want say is: Debian is about free software, IMHO we should
> not have su
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 05:57:43PM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> There are an ever growing number of packages that make use of the GNU Free
> Documentation License. Isn't it about time to put a copy of this license
> into the common reference area?
>
> Who should I talk to about this?
Why put a bl
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> (picked up from http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?sid=633)
>
> The scalability problems of the Packages file is a recognised problem that
> has been discused many times on this list, i think the following idea
> could go a long way to solving it.
>
Adam Majer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > 1) Large packages files
> > [... 3 level idea ...]
>
> I would suggest a solution that is much easier to manage. That is, packages
> should be sorted according to the date that the package was modified.
> This co
On 06 Apr 2002 19:45:29 -0500
"Colin Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 06:37, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> > An idea that i havent heard mentioned here is to create a
> > client/server application for specifically handling our metadata, the
> > server can be queried by clien
[ Please don't CC me, I read this list ]
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 20:03, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> We should not advertise directly or indirectly non-free software. I
> don't say we should refuse their sponsership totally, but if they
> provide hosting on non-free software I think that is a valid reas
I REALLY REALLY would like to see translated apt in woody.
And i cannot understand why apt-i18n is not installed so we could
test it. Adding apt-i18n to unstable will not break anything, but
interested developers can test this before adding it to real apt.
I've been thinking about calling to sign
> > galeon logtrend-httpagent rie
>
> Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
> are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
Galeon was unfortunately removed to a RC bug that did apply to a version
in sid, not in woody, t
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 03:03:14AM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> We should not advertise directly or indirectly non-free software.
Er, we _host_ non-free software on our servers, and distribute it via
our mirror network. If you want to go on a crusade, then there are
targets closer to home.
Ric
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 07:30:48PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 17:54, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > The thing I want say is: Debian is about free software, IMHO we should
> > not have such a prominent sponser promoting non-free
> > software. Especially as we probably don't ne
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 05:57:43PM -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> There are an ever growing number of packages that make use of the GNU Free
> Documentation License. Isn't it about time to put a copy of this license
> into the common reference area?
No, it would be premature. There's a draft for a
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 07:30:21PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 18:59, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > The keyword here is "prominent".
>
> Yes, it is.
>
> > The
> > Debian servers don't run non-free software provided by HP and/OR
> > Sun. The debconf2 registration page is hosted on
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 06:37, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> An idea that i havent heard mentioned here is to create a client/server
> application for specifically handling our metadata, the server can be
> queried by clients to send only the required metadata.
debian-corba already implements most of the
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 11:22, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> OK. Since the build problems seem to be easily solved (see #141077), I
> hope both mozilla and galeon can be included in woody.
Indeed. aj already knows that I'm on the next plane to Australia if
woody releases without Galeon :)
--
To UNSUB
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 17:54, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> The thing I want say is: Debian is about free software, IMHO we should
> not have such a prominent sponser promoting non-free
> software. Especially as we probably don't need it.
Jeroen, please calm down. I admit that while the registration pa
> It's interesting how strongly these fonts are a recommendation of free
> fonts. Misnamed glyphs need to be moved, those previously mentioned
> blank glyphs need to go away, and many new characters could be created
> with little work (Berylium has the c, h, g, j, s, u, circumflex and
> breve glyph
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 18:59, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> The keyword here is "prominent".
Yes, it is.
> The
> Debian servers don't run non-free software provided by HP and/OR
> Sun. The debconf2 registration page is hosted on a server with
> non-free software and has a link to a website with a non-f
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 12:17:46AM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> >
> > It subverts my principles (and probably also others). The fact that
> > the company itself is probably also going to distribute non-free
> > software also subverts my principles.
> >
>
According to
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=openh323gk&ver=2.0b4-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1017326211&file=log&as=raw
openh323gk-2.0.b4-1 was built for m68k on 28 Mar, however this package
doesn't seem to of been uploaded to the archives which is why this package
hasn't been released to test
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> It subverts my principles (and probably also others). The fact that
> the company itself is probably also going to distribute non-free
> software also subverts my principles.
>
> The thing I want say is: Debian is about free software, IMHO we shoul
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 12:54:32AM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > Why should we refuse? Lindows.com came to us, not the other way around.
>
> Because it's a proprietary software company?
Hey, I heard that some of our machines got donated by
proprietary software/hardware companies! So lets cut o
There are an ever growing number of packages that make use of the GNU Free
Documentation License. Isn't it about time to put a copy of this license
into the common reference area?
Who should I talk to about this?
Waiting is,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "Dwarf's Guide to Debian GNU/Linux" _
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 05:25:10PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 15:09, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > > I don't *like* the registration page being hosted on IIS. But I prefer a
> > > registration page to no registration page at all.
> >
> > Is it that difficult to make a registration
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 15:09, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > I don't *like* the registration page being hosted on IIS. But I prefer a
> > registration page to no registration page at all.
>
> Is it that difficult to make a registration page with free software?
To the best of my knowledge, no. But I did
I've had the following problem while trying to do a dist-upgrade this
morning:
([EMAIL PROTECTED])# dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/gvd_1.2.5-1_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 93580 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace gvd 1.2.5-1 (using .../archives/gvd_1.2.5-1_i386.deb
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 11:19:49PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Reasons enough to release woody+1 not too late.
>
> Speaking of which, woody+1 sounds like it's going to be a release similar to
> link -- no huge changes to cause a prolongued release time.
So, the Debian Installer is already ready
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 05:37:56PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Second i do not want to be shown the confirmation that the font uses
> "iso-8859-1" as default encoding...
Maybe it's a hint that you should be checking these things. (Actually,
deforma-hints should be checking these things for you,
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Actually, as always, it'll release when it's ready: if we find that the
> software doesn't meet our expectations on April 30th, you'll find me on
> the ground writhing in pain with leaves, bark and wood all over the place
> [1].
Well
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:49:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > > Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
> > > to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
> >
> > I heard something about a new release of Gnome coming out too. Gcc 3.1's
> > also due soon. W
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 15:03, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Joe Drew wrote:
> > Let me re-iterate this for people who might not have gotten the message:
> >
> > LINDOWS.COM HAS SPENT REAL MONEY ON DEBCONF 2 AND DESERVES SUPPORT, NOT
> > SCORN.
>
> While I don't want to squeze lindows support, I have to
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:30:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:56:55AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
> > to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
>
> I heard something about a new releas
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:39:21PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'm somewhat puzzled:
>
> Server: Microsoft-IIS/4.0
> Form submission goes to:
> Submit to http://net2.com/_vti_bin/shtml.dll/debconf2/index.html
>
> If I get this right, then registration for the Debian Conference,
> to a confere
Joe Drew wrote:
> Let me re-iterate this for people who might not have gotten the message:
>
> LINDOWS.COM HAS SPENT REAL MONEY ON DEBCONF 2 AND DESERVES SUPPORT, NOT
> SCORN.
While I don't want to squeze lindows support, I have to interpret
this statement like "Joey, shut up! Somebody has spent
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:39:21PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Submit to http://net2.com/_vti_bin/shtml.dll/debconf2/index.html
> >
> > If I get this right, then registration for the Debian Conference,
> > to a conference run by Free Software bigots, goes through heavily
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:02:08PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 13:39, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Form submission goes to:
> > Submit to http://net2.com/_vti_bin/shtml.dll/debconf2/index.html
> >
> > If I get this right, then registration for the Debian Conference,
> > to a confer
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:39:21PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Submit to http://net2.com/_vti_bin/shtml.dll/debconf2/index.html
>
> If I get this right, then registration for the Debian Conference,
> to a conference run by Free Software bigots, goes through heavily
> non-free and proprietary so
> (insert standard promotial rant about Super Sparrow here).
google finds supersparrow 0.0.0 from Feb 2001 on supersparrow.org and
sourceforge, and nothing more recent -- is there any life to it? it
certainly sounds interesting...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
>
> It'd be a very, very bad idea for anybody to start doing or saying
> anything non-constructive to Lindows.com. They as a company, and every
> person I've dealt with through Lindows.com, employee or otherwise, have
> been nothing but corteous and helpful, and have helped make Debconf 2 a
> poss
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 13:39, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Joe Drew wrote:
> > The 2nd Annual Debian Conference registration page is now available at
> > http://lindows.com/debconf2 . Thanks go to Lindows.com for hosting the
> > web page and all their gracious help.
>
> [...] queso reports
> a non-free o
Joe Drew wrote:
> The 2nd Annual Debian Conference registration page is now available at
> http://lindows.com/debconf2 . Thanks go to Lindows.com for hosting the
> web page and all their gracious help.
I'm somewhat puzzled:
luonnotar!joey(ttyp2):~> HEAD lindows.com
200 OK
Connection: close
Date:
Quite simple fixes:
- Fixes build on hppa and quite possibly others.
- Bump version number to replace older packages correctly. (RC bug)
- Fix a minor bug in the description.
Packages and diff are here:
http://www.misconception.org.uk/will/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Apr 06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> pfaedit
The "RC" bug appears to be in an out-of-date version of the package.
Furthermore, it's been closed for over a week...
> popularity-contest
Fixed for several days in NMU.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/
-
The release seems to draw near, but we won't see one of our central
packages translated, namely APT.
Why won't we? Well, perhaps because nobody tried to i18n it, perhaps?
No, that's not it. Well, maybe there are no translations ready. No,
that's not it either.
Patches are ready, 13 translations a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fuse
Version : 0.95
Upstream Author : Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> among others
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/avf
* License : GPL
Description : Filesystem in USErspace
I have roughly split f
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libsigc++-1.1
Version : 1.1.6
Upstream Author : Karl Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libsigc.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Description : Development branch of S
Blars Blarson wrote:
> The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings
> in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc
> should be considered "serious". See bug #141125 and spamassassin
> bug #188.
If you really must exactly offset amazon's whitelisted score, yo
On 6 Apr 2002, Rob Bradford wrote:
> * Split/Renamed packages *since* Potato - Have any of you packages been
> renamed or split. Note this includes merges as the net result is a
> rename.
The python-imaging documentation has been split, as not all of the
documentation is in the upstream archive.
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:04, Stephen Quinney wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-05
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: sextractor
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:59:32AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> What does a sex tractor have to do with astronomy?
>
> What is
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 06:41:27PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "we can tell that a Debian release is about to happen". Or
> > something.
> "I sense a disturbance in the force" ?
"As though millions of voices cried out, and ran apt-get."
Cheers,
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "we can tell that a Debian release is about to happen". Or
> something.
"I sense a disturbance in the force" ?
--
David N. Welton
Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 141479 apmd
Bug#141479: general: Problem when try to install apmd
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `apmd'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:56:55AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
> to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
I heard something about a new release of Gnome coming out too. Gcc 3.1's
also due soon. We're also a touch be
reassign 141479 apmd
thanks
I noticed this bug at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no\&bug=141479
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Colin!
You wrote:
> galeon 1.2.0-2 depends on mozilla-browser (>= 2:0.9.9), which isn't in
> testing because:
[mozilla doesn't build on hppa and is not yet built on m68k, sparc]
> In other words, it's currently mostly mozilla that's broken, not galeon.
> I guess that if mozilla is fixed then
I just realized this might be ambigous -- what I meant was not that
"we shouldn't be about to release woody", but rather that
"we can tell that a Debian release is about to happen". Or something.
Maybe I should keep my mouth shut when running on too little sleep :)
Daniel
--
/---
Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\
| "Progress just means bad things happen faster." |
|
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002 14:22:25 +0200
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> On related note, I've been looking at the various Debian statistics
> ...
> So it seems that even though we are in a period of stagnation when it
> comes to attracting new users, journalists and hype, the community
> a
On 06-Apr-2002 Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
>> Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide
>> policies, but this will be overridden every time spamassassin is
>> upgraded.
>
> Why not use dpkg-divert?
>
that is o
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 03:13, Otto Wyss wrote:
> Please show use any figures first before you assert this.
>
> I know rsync imposes some load for the computing of the md5sum but
> sendind only the difference outweighs it repeatedly.
It's my understanding that rsync imposes a large computational b
(I have CCd to debian-devel in case you are on holiday or otherwise
indisposed to close these)
ilisp is being removed from woody because of a bug that is fixed but not
closed. According to your changelog the following bugs are fixed, but are not
closed:
125744
140049
138669
137011
98132
12885
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 3:42 pm, Will Newton wrote:
> > ilisp
>
ilisp is in fact fixed, it's just the bug has not been closed yet due to a
typo in the changelog. I'll email the maintainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Package: general
Version: 20020406
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux maquina.jise.com 2.4.19-pre6 #2 SMP sáb abr 6 02:55:59
CEST 2002 i686 unknown
When I try to install apmd, and hdparm already installed, I get error
"Broken Pipe"
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 1:24 pm, Anthony Towns wrote:
> velocity werken.xpathantlr
These are all pretty much bug free (antlr has a couple of wishlist bugs) but
a jikes bug is keeping them out of testing. Does anyone who knows jikes have
any idea if this can be fixed soon, or is it a bi
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:17:02PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Yes, of course. It only says a newer version is in sid, and that it will
> be considered tomorrow.
It also says:
Depends: galeon mozilla
galeon 1.2.0-2 depends on mozilla-browser (>= 2:0.9.9), which isn't in
testing because:
m
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ijs-dev
Version : 0.33
Upstream Author : Raph Levien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxprinting.org/ijs
* License : MIT
Description : IJS raster image transport pr
As those of you who read slashdot know, Apache 2.0 was released last night.
Debian packages are available for testing at pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache
deb http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./
Please can people test these packages (after we've finished killing bugs for
woody, naturally).
I demand that Anthony Towns may or may not have written...
[snip]
> I'm becoming increasingly confident in woody's release readiness. So, to go
> out on a limb:
> Debian 3.0 (codenamed woody) will release on May 1st, 2002.
Oh good. What will it be releasing? :-)
--
| Darren Salt |
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> lclint
I'm working on an NMU just now.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydr
Hi Petter!
You wrote:
> [Bas Zoetekouw]
> > Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
> > are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
>
> Did you check
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#galeon>?
Yes, of course. It
Dear Sir/MadamI obtained
your e-mail address from an auto-responder. You are not on a mailing
list.I recently joined an investment program. I can now safely say that
I have found an investment program that pays, pays well and pays on
time.I am now receiving 40% per month on my investment and I
[Bas Zoetekouw]
> Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
> are no outstanding RC bugs, I assume there are dependency problems.
Did you check
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz#galeon>?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi Anthony!
You wrote:
> Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> galeon logtrend-httpagent rie
Is there anything I can do to get galeon included in woody? Since there
are no outstanding
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Paolo Redaelli wrote:
> > Looking at the testing and stable problems pages on master, I now notice
> > that for each and every architecture in potato, there are less
> > uninstallable packages in woody that in potato.
> >
> > All in all, nearly doubling th
Il sab, 2002-04-06 alle 13:10, Anthony DeRobertis ha scritto:
> Looking at the testing and stable problems pages on master, I now notice
> that for each and every architecture in potato, there are less
> uninstallable packages in woody that in potato.
>
> All in all, nearly doubling the architectu
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide
> policies, but this will be overridden every time spamassassin is
> upgraded.
Why not use dpkg-divert?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Looking at the testing and stable problems pages on master, I now notice
that for each and every architecture in potato, there are less
uninstallable packages in woody that in potato.
All in all, nearly doubling the architecture count results in less than
100 more uninstallables in woody.
Congrat
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings
> in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc
> should be considered "serious". See bug #141125 and spamassassin
> bug #188.
>
> Currently, I edit
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings
> in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc
> should be considered "serious". See bug #141125 and spamassassin
> bug #188.
It's not a configurati
Il sab, 2002-04-06 alle 09:39, Martin Schulze ha scritto:
> Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> > the grass debian package is currently sitting in incoming (or being
> > transferred there, 30Mb being quite a lot for my 128Kbit cdn). there are
> > still 20-25 lintian warnings and 5-6 errors, mainly relate
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jackit
Version : 0.24.2
Upstream Author : Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jackit.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL/LGPL
Description : JACK low-latency sound ser
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
>What does a sex tractor have to do with astronomy?
>
>What is a sex tractor anyway? A google search turned up some amusing
>results, especially the first one, but didn't seem to describe what you are
>packaging.
I've never been able to tell whether th
> > Some questions that need to be asked:
> > Howmany of our mirrors are rsyncable?
> How much load can the servers handle?
> How much more load does rsync do than a fast http server like tux?
>
Please show use any figures first before you assert this.
I know rsync imposes some load for the compu
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 11:03:53PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > I've now choosen "7dsc" since packages aren't commands.
>
> How about something more descriptive than "dsc"? Say, "package",
> "pkg", or "deb" (in my order of preference)?
>
I'm also not very happy with "dsc" but I neither are wit
The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings
in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc
should be considered "serious". See bug #141125 and spamassassin
bug #188.
Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide
policies, but this will be
Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> the grass debian package is currently sitting in incoming (or being
> transferred there, 30Mb being quite a lot for my 128Kbit cdn). there are
> still 20-25 lintian warnings and 5-6 errors, mainly related to the use
> of csh as a scripting shell. it works for me and i
94 matches
Mail list logo
