Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Many "gnustep" apps OTOH, use absurdly generic names, and I can only
>> conclude that the developers do not think about mixed systems at all.
>
> I disagree in the first case, and you are incorrect in the second.
What can I say? You claim this, but th
Hi,
Today, cupsys failed to start after its installation because a RPC
service (rpc.statd) was already listening on TCP port 631.
I wondered how portmap assigned such a port, and looked it up in glibc.
portmap uses svctcp_create to create such a socket. svctcp_create
calls bindresvport
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:41:03AM -0400, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> Miles Bader wrote:
> > Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am
> > > not connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of
> > > libraries
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:31:49PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > - recording talks on video is a problem and a big job; "Martin the
> > Argentinian living in New Zealand" was interested in the issue (mooch)
> >
>
> Did I hear someone call my name? ;)
>
> I am keen on organizing the vide
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, I rather thought that several people, myself included, had offered
> to take on the work of doing what we thought was valuable, and you have
> been trying to push it off on the security team over strenuous
> objections that it is not their job.
No,
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, the problem is that the procedure that we have is called
> backports.org, or private repositories. I agree that we also have a
> lack of an agreed upon maintenance strategy, but I respectfully disagree
> that we have either a team or an archive at
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I really think spamassassin 3 should make it into Sarge, if at all
> possible, and not be held up by depending packages which aren't up
> to speed.
I'm currently inclined to leave 2.64 in sarge (as has been my
intention ever since
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * martin f krafft
>
> | What do you think?
>
> API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
>
> Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
> system. Per child.
Umm... I'd like to s
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:22:02PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The major change that I'm aware of is the nonsensical change of 'hits'
> to 'score'[1] in the output. Just provide both 'hits' and 'score' and
> this particular problem will go away. [This was the major issue facing
> spamass-milter,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:37:04PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:01:12PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> > ??? Since when does exim4 use SA by default? AFAIK, you have to
> > specifically configure it to use it. Right? If so, there should be no
> > reason to remove it
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:51:46PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> But the problem is that spamassassin 2 works in usual people MX systems
> (which usually is your older desktop) while SA3 has a big problem in
> that machines, making it unusable.
>
> And, BTW, since version 2.64 we have:
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 23:12, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Oded Shimon [u] wrote on 06/10/2004 20:33:
> > I have already completed a package myself for kmenc15.
> > I am now looking for a Debian sponsor for my program.
> > The package can be found at
> > http://ares.penguinhosting.net/~ods15/kmenc15
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What I (and it seems, others) would like to see is:
> > 3) some other method to upgrade software that has to change rapidly to
> >meet new classes of threats, even though these threats may n
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, while this may well be analogous, it is far from being
> > the same thing, and I don't think the security team should be saddled
> > with yet another task.
>
> I am happy to agr
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 23:25]:
> Unfortunately, most of what I have seen has been an attempt to have a
> new place that involves no actual backporting and publicity work,
> rather than volunteering to take that load on.
Actually, I'm considering very much to pick the tas
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, while this may well be analogous, it is far from being
> the same thing, and I don't think the security team should be saddled
> with yet another task.
I am happy to agree that the brunt of meeting the new work is upon the
proposers of
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 23:05]:
> On Oct 06, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, if I dist-upgrade my mail server so a new spamassassin comes in, my
> > mail setup breaks. Now, that is clearly broken, and an RC bug on some
> > package.
> We are talking a
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I (and it seems, others) would like to see is:
> 3) some other method to upgrade software that has to change rapidly to
>meet new classes of threats, even though these threats may not affect
>the machine running the software itself. This cat
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the problem is not so much whether s.d.o is the right place,
> but rather whether anti-virus stuff can go in there. Security fixes
> are backported to ensure no new features trickle in and to minimise
> changes. With AV software and the like, t
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.2256 +0200]:
> Under your scheme, Sarge would be bereft of all the packages
> that build on SA that have not changed, at the cost of something that
> has shown all evidence of being flakey and not ready for prime time
> yet.
My
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:33:37 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1616
> +0200]:
>> This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
>> order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from sarge
>> if
Steinar H. Gunderson [u] wrote on 06/10/2004 22:37:
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 09:10:39PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
>>
>
??? Since when does exim4 use SA by default? AFAIK, you have to
specifically configure it to use it. Right? If so, there should be no
reason to remove it or for it t
On Oct 06, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if I dist-upgrade my mail server so a new spamassassin comes in, my
> mail setup breaks. Now, that is clearly broken, and an RC bug on some
> package.
We are talking about unstable.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [8393 idbw1qdMcWarw]
sig
On 06 Oct 2004 12:33:42 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I thought that 'issues related to the development of debian' was on
>> topic for this list. It is not at all clear to me that this is a
>> security issue, because outdated A
also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.2244 +0200]:
> That can be done of course - as well as we have exim4 in addition
> to exim, or inn2 in addition to inn. But in this case, reverting
> the latest upload of spamassassin might be a good idea.
I can't wait for Duncan to join in
El miÃ, 06-10-2004 a las 08:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
escribiÃ:
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> > b. provide a new version that can interface with spamassassin 3.
>
> Just for the record, current amavisd-new can talk to spamassassin 3, even if
> not perfectly (chroots
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 22:40]:
> also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.2234 +0200]:
> > I guess spamassassin3 won't be added to sarge. Can you remember
> > the upload of the latest kde to unstable, and the explicit NO from
> > the release masters? Can you
also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.2234 +0200]:
> I guess spamassassin3 won't be added to sarge. Can you remember
> the upload of the latest kde to unstable, and the explicit NO from
> the release masters? Can you remember that already before that it
> was said "no new upstre
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:01:12PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> ??? Since when does exim4 use SA by default? AFAIK, you have to
> specifically configure it to use it. Right? If so, there should be no
> reason to remove it or for it to conflict with SA3.
Well, if I dist-upgrade my mail server so a
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 16:35]:
> also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1616 +0200]:
> > This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
> > order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from
> > sarge if necessary.
> That preve
also sprach Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06. +0200]:
> The major change that I'm aware of is the nonsensical change of
> 'hits' to 'score'[1] in the output. Just provide both 'hits' and
> 'score' and this particular problem will go away. [This was the
> major issue facing spamass-
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I thought that 'issues related to the development of debian' was on topic
> > for this list. It is not at all clear to me that this is a security
> > issue, because outdated A/V software usuall
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: php4-pear-html
Version : 1.10.1
Upstream Author : Pierre-Alain Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Template_IT/
* License : GPL
Description : Simple template API. Template syst
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1616 +0200]:
> > This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
> > order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from
> > sarge if necessary.
>
> That prevents SA f
Steinar H. Gunderson [u] wrote on 06/10/2004 18:29:
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:33:37PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>>
>
I say: remove all the others from Sarge unless or until they comply
with SA 3.
>
>>
>> OK, so you want to remove exim4 from sarge, thus breaking installation
>> altog
also sprach Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.2133 +0200]:
> I think (1) is true, and I think both (A) and (B) are true. I am
> not sure about (2), but I do understand why people are arguing for
> it. If they are correct, then it seems to me that the security
> archive is alread
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought that 'issues related to the development of debian' was on topic
> for this list. It is not at all clear to me that this is a security
> issue, because outdated A/V software usually does not place the server
> it runs on at risk for compromise.
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.2023
+0200]:
> How much network latency do you have? If -m10 is helping you, you
> must be waiting on TCP/IP requests like crazy.
I am not sure. A normal run via spamd takes about 3 seconds per
message. At peak times, the se
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #274003
I have already completed a package myself for kmenc15.
I am now looking for a Debian sponsor for my program.
The package can be found at
http://ares.penguinhosting.net/~ods15/kmenc15/kmenc15-0.01e.tar.gz
http://ares.penguinhosting.net/~ods15/kmenc15/kmenc15_
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
> possibly others involved)!
Well, I'm not at all convinced this is so good. Didn't the RMs say
something about 'no major new upstream releases', in order
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:19:35PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:02:00PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
> > tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
> > problem.
martin f krafft wrote:
>also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1934 +0200]:
>
>
>>After running for a little while,
>>
>>
>[...]
>
>
>>I wouldn't say it uses half a gig of ram. Something else is going
>>on..
>>
>>
>
>I had -m10 passed to spamd for 2.64. When I upgraded,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: haskell-devscripts
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : N/A (will be maintained in Debian only)
* License : GPL
Description : Tools to help Debian developers build Haske
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
> system. Per child.
This is a ridiculous big RSS. What are you telling SA to do? Load 20MB of
AWL and 20MB of Bayes data into memory?
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1934 +0200]:
> > After running for a little while,
> [...]
> > I wouldn't say it uses half a gig of ram. Something else is going
> > on..
>
> I had -m10 passed to spamd for 2.64. When I upgraded, I
Stay at any fairfield resort for as low as 85 dollars a night. I have
an ownership with one million points. I cant use them all Let me know
where you want to stay. 727-571-4298
ERIC
Please Paste following link to Un-subscribe :
http://usvad.net/newsletter2/maillist/[EMAIL
also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1934 +0200]:
> After running for a little while,
[...]
> I wouldn't say it uses half a gig of ram. Something else is going
> on..
I had -m10 passed to spamd for 2.64. When I upgraded, I left that in
place. I almost hosed a server that went up
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>* martin f krafft
>
>| What do you think?
>
>API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
>
>Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
>system. Per child.
>
>
>
After running for a little while,
PID USER PR NI VI
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > FWIW, I think that every upload to the security archive should be
> > accompanied by a security advisory. I wouldn't be at all surprised if
> > the security team felt that uploads that don't merit
On 06-Oct-04, 11:06 (CDT), Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I only use dpkg-architecture and dpkg-deb -b. Everything under
> DEBIAN/ is generated by hand.
Why? The tools are there, and have been for a long time. I've been
with Debian since 0.9x, and I don't think I ever wrote the fin
Scripsit Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 2004-10-06 16:09 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Do not try to compute Installed-Size by hand - dpkg-gencontrol will do
> > it for you correctly.
> For my enlightenment, what does dpkg-gencontrol do that is more
> correct than summing st_blocks ?
* martin f krafft
| What do you think?
API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
system. Per child.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendl
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:08:42PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I am under the impression that 'normal procedures' does not involve
> > > updating the application to catch new threats. If I'm wrong,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:33:37PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I say: remove all the others from Sarge unless or until they comply
> with SA 3.
OK, so you want to remove exim4 from sarge, thus breaking installation
altogether?
> I fail to see yours and Adrian's rationale for why spamassassin
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:02:00PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
> tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
> problem. Basically, we do
>
> tempfile=`mktemp`
> echo something > $tempfile
>
> an
On 2004-10-06 16:09 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Is the Installed-Size field supposed to be computed for a specific
> > block size, or can I just go with a usual block size like 4k ?
>
> Do not try to compute Installed-Size by hand - dpkg-gencon
On Monday 04 October 2004 20:23, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you do me the favor of producing readable mails, i.e. with
> empty lines between text and quotes, and sensible line lengths?
>
> Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Frank,
> >
> >> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), lib
Scripsit Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in order
> that we don't forget to remove said other packages from sarge if
> necessary.
Won't work, at least not by itself. Since we expect the other packages
to sooner or later be updated
Scripsit Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is the Installed-Size field supposed to be computed for a specific
> block size, or can I just go with a usual block size like 4k ?
Do not try to compute Installed-Size by hand - dpkg-gencontrol will do
it for you correctly.
That is, unless you have a
On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And developers writing with GNUstep recognize the same thing. The difference
> is that we *have* to give enough information about an app using only two
> pieces of information -- the name of the app and its icon.
"*Have*" to?
Hi,
in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
problem. Basically, we do
tempfile=`mktemp`
echo something > $tempfile
and this will fail if the noclobber option is set in the executing
shell, because af
Is the Installed-Size field supposed to be computed for a specific
block size, or can I just go with a usual block size like 4k ?
--
André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
Do not use this account for regular correspondance.
See the URL above for contact information.
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1616 +0200]:
> This is backwards. The conflicts must be added in spamassassin in
> order that we don't forget to remove said other packages from
> sarge if necessary.
That prevents SA from entering Sarge.
I say: remove all the others from S
* Steinar H. Gunderson:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:12:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> The most common performance issue with ext3 file systems is caused by
>> software that accesses files in the order returned by readdir. Has
>> this been ruled out?
>
> What other, sane alternatives are th
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> If you'd be so kind as to refer to #274993, I think we have
> a problem. A number of packages (see the bug report) depend on
> spamassassin, but some are not going to work with version 3, which
> changed the API considerably. The ex
Scripsit Joachim Reichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Uups, I missed that I might have to change the name of the library
> itself. Or is it possible to have a package named "libcore++1"
> containing libraries "libcore.so.1"? (If yes, there is still the
> problem that a quite generic (file)name is used.)
On Oct 06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but the basic problem I'm speaking about has nothing to do with
> volatile - but just that requiring substancially more memory might be a
> bad idea. We still have inn1 and inn2 parallel (and I'm a happy user of
> inn1), for similar reas
Hi,
Will Debian's "native" PowerPC compiler (similar to gcc version ?) run on
"vanilla"rLinux 2.6.8-rc4 on MPC 8275 (PQ2FADS-VR) ?
Also does Debian have a PowerPC perl package ? and would it run on
"vanilla"rLinux 2.6.8-rc4 on MPC 8275 (PQ2FADS-VR) ?
Also did anybody at Debian tried running "Cer
Would anybody at Debian be interested to discuss my lmbench results attached
below (comparing "vanilla" Linux 2.6..8-rc4 kernel with and without "kernel
preemption" option running on PQ2FADS-VR with MPC 8275) ?
Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: Povolotsky, Alexander
> Sent: S
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:12:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The most common performance issue with ext3 file systems is caused by
> software that accesses files in the order returned by readdir. Has
> this been ruled out?
What other, sane alternatives are there? Should the list be sorted by
* Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo:
> Here is some kind of explanation:
> http://www.tribulaciones.org/blog/computers/ext3-performance_27-09-2004.html
The most common performance issue with ext3 file systems is caused by
software that accesses files in the order returned by readdir. Has
this been ruled
* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 15:05]:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin 3 on
> > > > my workstation due to
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >
> > If this is not solved, we really should consider to re-introduce
> > spamassassin 2 as spamassassin, and the version 3 as spamassassin3.
>
> Or we should not con
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> If this is not solved, we really should consider to re-introduce
> spamassassin 2 as spamassassin, and the version 3 as spamassassin3.
Or we should not consider it.
In such case 2.64 will become obsolete even faster than 2.20 did
* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041006 14:20]:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
> > possibly others involved)!
> Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin 3 on
> m
also sprach Francesco P. Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1418 +0200]:
> Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin
> 3 on my workstation due to performace problems. It is really
> a memory and cpu hog.
I have to confirm.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
> possibly others involved)!
>
Just for record, I and a few other people removed spamassassin 3 on
my workstation due to performace problems. It is reall
Miles Bader wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am
> > not connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of
> > libraries that I use to write my apps -- you wouldn't put "GTK+" in
> > the name o
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> b. provide a new version that can interface with spamassassin 3.
Just for the record, current amavisd-new can talk to spamassassin 3, even if
not perfectly (chroots needs some... tweaking).
As for the bugs, go ahead. spamassassin 2 is pretty much us
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:52:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> If you'd be so kind as to refer to #274993, I think we have
> a problem. A number of packages (see the bug report) depend on
> spamassassin, but some are not going to work with version 3, which
> changed the API considerably. The ex
Hi folks,
Spamassassin 3 is finally in unstable. Thanks to Duncan (and
possibly others involved)!
If you'd be so kind as to refer to #274993, I think we have
a problem. A number of packages (see the bug report) depend on
spamassassin, but some are not going to work with version 3, which
changed t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dictem
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Aleksey Cheusov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.mova.org/~cheusov/pub/dictem/
* License : GPL
Description : Dict client for emacs
Dictem implements all func
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I think that every upload to the security archive should be
> accompanied by a security advisory. I wouldn't be at all surprised if
> the security team felt that uploads that don't merit security advisories
> were an inappropriate use of their archiv
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why is this document useful for offline reading and not a few billion
> others? (And where's that package of the Finnish constituition we were
> promised a few years back?!)
Many parts of Debian intend conformance with SUSv3, which makes
it more import
> I am not sure what you mean by startup.
When Linux boots up.
> When the libraries were loaded, they started a few daemons, but, I
> believe KDE and GNOME libraries do the same thing. Again, how is GNUstep
> any different in this regard than the other desktop environments?
At one point in time,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package: libimage-base-bundle-perl
Description: modules for loading, saving and creating xpm and xbm images
A set of perl modules for loading, saving, and creating xpm and xbm
images. Contains the following modules:
.
Image::Base
Image::Xpm
Image::
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Miles Bader wrote:
Marc Dequ«²nes (Duck) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BTW, if i'm not dead for GNOME 2.10, custom Debian menu is gonna die, as
it is a bunch of unbrowseable nightmare stuff.
IMHO this would be a very bad move to remove the menu which looks the same
on all user in
87 matches
Mail list logo