> > What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code?
> >
> Good question. I do not have personal experience with this, but I am
> told you can write your code once and then recompile it for a wide
> variety of platforms
On the website it says it's a cross compiler, that is to say you can
Le 03-07-2006, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
>> Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient, portable
>> code
>
> What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code?
>
Good question. I do not h
Hello,
i did not understand. Are you saying that the compiler?
Openwatcom: open source multi platform c/c++ and fortran compiler.
Url: http://www.openwatcom.org
There that at one,
watcom c: c/c++ compiler
I hope, You don't mix with this.
Regards,
> Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> su, 2006-07-02 kell
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
* Package name: openwatcom
Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient, portable code
What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code?
Perhaps it is a Java compiler in disguise
su, 2006-07-02 kello 18:17 -0400, Jason Spiro kirjoitti:
> * Package name: openwatcom
> Description : C/C++ compiler and IDE that produce efficient, portable
> code
What does it mean for a compiler to produce portable code?
--
One does not see anything until one sees its beauty. -- O.
ll refit inside debian.
does lilo has to be installed before running gptsync?
> I've temporarily put refit packages on:
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20060702/
nice, I'll try it tonight.
thanx,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
"Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's two seperate issues here. Firstly, using pkg-config to find
> libraries. Autoconf solves this nicely already. Maybe in the future
> autoconf can use pkg-config, but pkg-config is not widespread enough
> to really do that yet. No dependa
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > You know that you can easily turn off this feature by adjusting apt.conf:
> Sure, and I've done so for several of my machines now. Actually, for many
> enough
Greetings Debian-devel!!
We are an international escrow company.
Now we are looking for a new partners.
You can earn some money - do not lose this opportunity!
It is easy and completely free for you.
Please contact us for more details: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best wishes,
Elmer Melton
---
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:36:12AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "use", like, for example, compile a piece of software. You don't
> > need to distribute openwatcom to anyone to fall within this clause.
>
> Ok, but it still needs to be modified. Are y
Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> Ok, but it still needs to be modified. Are you suggesting that the
> freedom to produce a binary that can't be recompiled by anyone else is a
> necessary freedom?
>
>
I haven't read the license, and I suggest asking on -legal if you want a
full analysis, but the gen
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006, Brian May wrote:
> I don't expect such a system to implement virtual hosting without
> system administrator intervention, but a naming convention for the files
We must make this intervention easy, but other than that...
> that supports virtual hosts would be even better IMHO,
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not limited to modified versions
Yes it is. In fact, it seems to be limited to the modifications
themselves, rather than an entire modified source tree.
> it's for a period of time far exceeding that of the distribution.
Like Mozilla.
--
Matthe
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # 1.4 "Deploy" means to use, sublicense or distribute Covered Code
> # other than for Your internal research and development (R&D) and/or
> # Personal Use, and includes without limitation, any and all internal
> # use or distribution of Covered Code withi
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:50:07PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
> [snip]
> > the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece
> > of software (thu
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:10:34AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece of
> > software (thus not "Personal Use"), you need to make the source of
> > openwatcom publicly available for 12 months.
> "Jaldhar" == Jaldhar H Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> In an effort to clean up the SSL certificate mess on Ubuntu
>> servers, we recently converted all our supported Server
>> packages to make use of the ssl-cert package instead of
>> creating a package-specific self-sig
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece of
> software (thus not "Personal Use"), you need to make the source of
> openwatcom publicly available for 12 months.
What?
"You must make Source Code of all Your Deployed Modifications p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
[snip]
> the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece
> of software (thus not "Personal Use"), you need to make the
> source of openwatcom publicly a
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
> * Package name: openwatcom
> * License : Sybase Open Watcom Public License 1.0 (it is
> OSI-approved)
Oops... it looks like OSI smoked something especially bad this time,
I'm afraid. This license looks like someone took h
ut this?
# apt-get install refit (when it enters past the NEW queue)
# gptsync /dev/sda
I've temporarily put refit packages on:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20060702/
It really needs more work.
> but I don't know how to properly run this (usin "bless" I gues
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openwatcom
Version : I plan to do version 1.4 (or 1.6, if it comes out soon)
Upstream Author : an independent team of volunteer contributors
* URL : http://www.openwatcom.org/
* License : Sybase Open Watcom Public
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libapache2-mod-ifier
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.steve.org.uk/Software/mod_ifier/
* License : GPL + Apache and SSL linki
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: uulib
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : Doaitse Swierstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur Baars <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, Daan Leijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 6/30/06, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Marc Haber:
> The machine in Question is a P3 with 1200 MHz. What's making the
> process slow is the turnaround time for the http requests, as observed
> multiple times in this thread alone.
Then your setup is very broken. APT performs HT
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:29:40 +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>* Marc Haber:
>> The machine in Question is a P3 with 1200 MHz. What's making the
>> process slow is the turnaround time for the http requests, as observed
>> multiple times in this thread alone.
>
>Then your setup is ve
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:12:10PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:26:15AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Still, the buildd admin has no way to estimate how much a sub-process
> > > of a package is going to use, the ma
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:26:30AM -0700, Jason Self wrote:
> The listed maintainers for the Webmin package
> (http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/webmin) and the associated
> packages like webmin-core, Usermin, etc. are MIA. They are not fixing
> bugs or responding anymore.
>
> Jamie Cameron
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package names : ctserver and vpb-driver
Upstream Author : Voicetronix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.voicetronix.com.au/
* License : (GPL, LGPL)
Programming Lang: (C, C++, Perl)
Description :
Jason Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The listed maintainers for the Webmin package
> (http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/webmin) and the associated
> packages like webmin-core, Usermin, etc. are MIA. They are not fixing
> bugs or responding anymore.
Which is why they had asked to rrmove th
also sprach Jason Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.02.1026 +0200]:
> into unstable." I was wondering: How does one do that if the current
> maintainers aren't responding?
I would start with NMU'ing, that is, simply uploading new versions
that fix bugs, but without changing the maintainer field.
The listed maintainers for the Webmin package
(http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/webmin) and the associated
packages like webmin-core, Usermin, etc. are MIA. They are not fixing
bugs or responding anymore.
Jamie Cameron is the official author of Webmin
(http://webmin.com/about.html) and has
Hello:
we are networking items resller , we sell lots of cisco networking
items, such as GBIC,SFP, WICs, routers and switches, and so on. so if u
are interested in that , please tell us the quantity and items NO. ,
then we can try to offer the price to u asap ,and if not in the
33 matches
Mail list logo
