* Michael Banck:
> Are you sure gij-4.3 is not just dragged in via Recommends, i.e. the
> buildd chroot is properly setup? AFAICT, you did not mention which
> package failed above (if you can disclose it), so it's hard to
> investigate further I guess.
It's cacao-oj6 and openjdk-6, part of test
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libprobe-perl-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Randy W. Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Probe-Perl/
* License : same as Perl (GPL-1+ or A
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 09:32:41PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen dijo [Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 07:08:05AM +]:
> > > > - Having files *vital* to the system not tracked by dpkg is
> > > > counter-productive. At the very least it thwarts the most basic and
> > > > obvious way of integrit
So, DKMS is being run after the installation of a kernel. Am I right?
Yes.
Btw, is all this documented anywhere?
I guess it isn't.
Kindly,
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tzafrir Cohen dijo [Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 07:08:05AM +]:
> > > - Having files *vital* to the system not tracked by dpkg is
> > > counter-productive. At the very least it thwarts the most basic and
> > > obvious way of integrity protection.
> >
> > Dpkg is not tripwire. If you think you can re
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:25:48PM -0700, Ken Teague wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Software RAID is be automatically detected from the boot sector, hence
> > should be visible from a LiveCD.
>
>
> Debian Live didn't have mdadm. Debian Lenny netinstall found the md's,
> but didn't have fsc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libfile-find-rule-vcs-perl
Version : 1.04
Upstream Author : Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Find-Rule-VCS/
* License : same as Pe
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 02:55:40PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I've noticed that most issues tracked on the release-critical bug
> tracker [1] are actually already fixed in unstable. This is leading
> to the perception there are an enormous number of unfixed
> release-critical issues for lenny
"Michael Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suggest that, by default, the release-critical tracker page list
> only those bugs that do not have a fix uploaded yet (make it optional
> to list all current RC issues).
Try the alternative interface on http://bts.turmzimmer.net, which
provides ev
Hello,
I've noticed that most issues tracked on the release-critical bug
tracker [1] are actually already fixed in unstable. This is leading
to the perception there are an enormous number of unfixed
release-critical issues for lenny (298 currently). And it makes it
harder to figure out which iss
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmodule-math-depends-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.orrg/dist/Module-Math-Depends/
* License : same as
On 09/13/08 00:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 01:21:35AM +, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sdlbasic
Version : 0.0.20070714
Upstream Author : Paulo Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pierre Neyron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libsort-naturally-perl
Version : 1.02
Upstream Author : Sean M. Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sort-Naturally
* License : same as Perl (Artis
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmodule-manifest-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Addam Kennedy
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Manifest/
* License : same as Perl (Artistic or GPL-1+)
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> This is probably a FAQ, and I guess I knew the answer at one point.
> What are the requirements for /proc and buildds? Can packages assume
> that /proc/self/stat exist in a buildd environment?
>
> The following is from mundy.debian
Florian Weimer, le Sat 13 Sep 2008 10:43:40 +0200, a écrit :
> This is probably a FAQ, and I guess I knew the answer at one point.
> What are the requirements for /proc and buildds?
>From a Debian GNU/Hurd point of view, it is well known that /proc is
needed for quite a few packages (and that used
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du samedi 13 septembre 2008, vers
09:08, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> Do not assume everybody maintaining the system know of dkms (or of m-a
> or such). Knowledge of debsums or equivalent should be assumed from
> anybody maintaining a Debian s
This is probably a FAQ, and I guess I knew the answer at one point.
What are the requirements for /proc and buildds? Can packages assume
that /proc/self/stat exist in a buildd environment?
The following is from mundy.debian.org, from a testing-security build:
| Setting up gij-4.3 (4.3.1-9) ...
|
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
apt-get install what ever package you need
It is only installed on a ramdisk (the one that is union-mounted on top
of the compressed file system of the CD), but that doesn't really matter
for a one-time shot. As long as you have internet connection there
Got that far with De
On sam, 2008-09-13 at 06:21 +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Can you do that if you generate modules for both 2.6.26-1-686 and
> 2.6.26-1-vserver-686 ?
Will tell you on monday.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On sam, 2008-09-13 at 00:21 +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> > No. You only need dkms.
> >
> Hmm... How does dkms build the modules for a build kernel, then?
> Surely a compiler and linker must be needed, right?
You build the module on the build host, then put it on a .deb package.
You install
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 01:54:43AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 13 septembre 2008 à 00:44 +0200, José Luis Tallón a écrit :
> > - Having files *vital* to the system not tracked by dpkg is
> > counter-productive. At the very least it thwarts the most basic and
> > obvious way of integ
22 matches
Mail list logo
