In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> xipmsg is there for IP Messenger.
Is "IP Messenger" a special protocol? I dont really see "IP"(as in Internet
Protocol?) beeing a very aproperiate label.
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Quoting Charles Plessy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Would it help the release team if people who want to help would file properly
> argumented requests of removal for such packages? This would clear the RC
> radar
> and focus energy on the packages without which Debian can not consider
> releasing.
I
Hello,
Is the NEW queue going to get processed any time soon? There's a load
of packages that are 3 weeks or more old.
Thanks,
-S
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The Linux Expo of Southern California is proud to announce their second
Women in
Open Source Conference. The conference will be held on February 20th,
2009 in
conjunction with the 7th Annual So Cal Linux Expo.
The SCALE 7X Women In Open Source conference continues last year's work in
encouragin
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/12/2008):
> [blablabla for the actual question:]
> Subject: Re: Can we help the release by proposing package removals?
Look at debian-release@, that's already being done.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:43 AM, LI Daobing (李道兵) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> maybe, I did not use Bonjour.
>>
>> and the windows version of IP Messenger (also called "飞鸽传书" in
>> Chinese) is already widely used (a
Hi all,
prompted by weekly news, I had a look at the RC bug page.
I think that one limitation of the RC concept is that it does not distinguish:
- the packages that would not be part of the release if it were to be done
today,
- the pacakges without which Debian will not release.
Let's see fo
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:43 AM, LI Daobing (李道兵) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maybe, I did not use Bonjour.
>
> and the windows version of IP Messenger (also called "飞鸽传书" in
> Chinese) is already widely used (at least in China), so I want to
> introduce the linux client to Debian.
xipmsg is there
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:28:22AM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > But still: How does this relate to IM, or to older protocols like "talk"?
>>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:28:22AM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But still: How does this relate to IM, or to older protocols like "talk"?
> > (The Google Translation of the URL doesn't make much sense.)
> >
> 1. it has
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rpy2
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Gautier
* URL or Web page : http://rpy.sf.net
* License : LPGL
Description : Python interface to the GNU R language, version 2
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
> Except that debtags are right now for binary packages, whereas
> copyright is for source packages.
Err, not quite right:
Policy 4.5:
> Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright and
> distribution license in the file */usr/share/doc/pac
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Would something like apt-listbugs work? I know it doesnt address the
>> offline issue, but seems to fit as a concept for the rest of the
>> problem.
>
> Yep, that should be enough, as long as there is a way (with some
> possible
Miriam Ruiz dijo [Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:51:04PM +0100]:
> > The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
> > *designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
> > , it "just" needs someone with the energy of finalizing the proposal
> > (most likely via a
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-02 23:10]:
> As there is no security support for backports I do not feel comfortable
> adding this (the changes to the website were made by me and the article
> for DPN was submitted by me).
How come you think so?
http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo/li
On mar, 2008-12-02 at 16:33 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
>
> There's also epdfview, described as "in the lines of Evince but
> without
> using the GNOME libraries".
>
> It uses Poppler, but otherwise I have no idea how it compares to
> Evince.
It's really nice and light, but not as feature-rich
2008/12/2 Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Would something like apt-listbugs work? I know it doesnt address the
> offline issue, but seems to fit as a concept for the rest of the
> problem.
Yep, that should be enough, as long as there is a way (with some
possible development in the future) for a
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:36:15 +0100
"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Drake Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Quoth Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
> >> Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
> >> installing the package, can
Holger Levsen wrote:
> This (some hw works during installation but not later) can be easily
> solved: by installing 2.6.26 from backports.org :-)
>
> Can someone please add this info to "Limitations:" section on
> http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/etchnhalf ?!
As there is no security support fo
2008/12/2 Drake Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoth Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
>> Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
>> installing the package, can you?
>
> p.d.o appears to permit viewing copyright files of packages currently
> in
Quoth Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
> Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
> installing the package, can you?
p.d.o appears to permit viewing copyright files of packages currently
in the archive. As an example:
http://packages.deb
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [ M-F-T set to -devel ]
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >> We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
> >> users ca
2008/12/2 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [ M-F-T set to -devel ]
>
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
>> users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
>
> Except t
[ M-F-T set to -devel ]
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
> users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
Except that debtags are right now for binary packages, whereas
copyr
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 17:21, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> used. However, the kernel used for the installed system remains
> unchanged at version 2.6.24. In some cases this can mean that hardware
> which is supported during the installation does not work after the
> reboot into the
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> ..because I do not use GNOME and KDE and it does not suck several
>> 100 MByte of useless GNOME and KDE libs!
> 'evince-gtk' package pulls much less dependencies, I am using it with XFCE.
Since 2.24 (which is in experimental) the evinc
Bjørn Mork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We've discussed this at the Security Team meeting in Essen and we don't
>> have a problem with qmail being included in Lenny.
> You are aware of upstream's attitude towards security holes? There are
> lots
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:43:30AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Now, as of version 3.005, ucf started using a feaure that has
> > long been a part of cdebconf, but was only ported to debconf in version
> > 1.5.19, so now ucf
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gksu-polkit
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://live.gnome.org/gksu
* License : GPLv3/LGPLv3
Programming L
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 17:15 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > ..because I do not use GNOME and KDE and it does not suck several
> > 100 MByte of useless GNOME and KDE libs!
> 'evince-gtk' package pulls much less dependencies, I am using it with XFCE.
There's al
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> ..because I do not use GNOME and KDE and it does not suck several
> 100 MByte of useless GNOME and KDE libs!
'evince-gtk' package pulls much less dependencies, I am using it with XFCE.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
Ukrainia
Am 2008-11-30 20:59:31, schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
> Does anybody
> know why on Earth is Acroread popular? Why isn't a PDF regularly
> handled in a saner way with Evince (or kde-based lookalike) in some
> distributions?
..because I do not use GNOME and KDE and it does not suck several
100 MByte o
On Tue, 02 Dec 08 12:49, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > Anyway, I'm probably hugely off topic now. If anyone has experience with
> > Free software and PDF annotations I'd love to hear about it, otherwise
> > I'll try to
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Now, as of version 3.005, ucf started using a feaure that has
> long been a part of cdebconf, but was only ported to debconf in version
> 1.5.19, so now ucf started depending on:
>debconf (>= 1.5.19) | cdebconf
> and this is where trou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> Anyway, I'm probably hugely off topic now. If anyone has experience with
> Free software and PDF annotations I'd love to hear about it, otherwise
> I'll try to find some time to build up the SoC work and see what
> happens.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtest-needsdisplay-perl
Version : 1.05
Upstream Author : Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-NeedsDisplay/
* License : same as Perl
Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I'm quite surprised how the inclusion of qmail and related packages
> into sid is handled, or rather not handled, by the ftpmasters.
I downloaded the netqmail source from http://dbn.smarden.org/sid/ and
looked briefly at it, to see if most of the well
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've discussed this at the Security Team meeting in Essen and we don't
> have a problem with qmail being included in Lenny.
You are aware of upstream's attitude towards security holes? There are
lots of assumptions like "nobody will ever do ...".
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:14:02AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:19:42PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > That wasn't the point I was trying to make; I was asking a genuine
> > question about the status of evince (and would have been delighted
> > to have been pointed
* Bernd Eckenfels:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> Personally, I'm more concerned about manual constant propagation in
>> some parts of the code base (like using the integer literal 4 for the
>> size of an IPv4 address), and similar coding style issues. But this
>> is certainly not
40 matches
Mail list logo
